Integrating popular music and informal music learning practices: A multiple case study of secondary school music teachers enacting change in music education
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2019
Integrating popular music and informal music learning practices: A multiple case study of secondary school music teachers enacting change in music education
The purpose of this multiple case study was to examine the practices and perspectives of four music teachers who integrated popular music and informal music learning practices into their secondary school music programs in the United States. A primary goal was to understand music teachers’ process of enacting change. Data included 16 semi-structured interviews, eight school site visits and observations, documents, and a researcher journal. Findings revealed that teachers enacted change within micro-contexts—their classrooms. Teachers had an internal locus for change; they developed rationales for change and initiated curricular changes in response to a lack of student engagement, which seemed to stem from students feeling insecure in their musical abilities and disconnected from the content and pedagogy used in music classes. For the teachers in this study, the solution was integrating popular music and informal music learning practices. Thematic analysis revealed eight characteristics of effective teacher-initiated change in secondary music education: (1) holistic and gradual change processes, (2) teacher reflection and inquiry, (3) teacher autonomy, (4) enabling institutional factors, (5) use of a variety of supportive networks, (6) student-centered pedagogy, (7) teacher-selected professional development, and (8) a balance of structure and chaos and formal and informal learning.
AbramoJ. M. (2011). Gender differences of popular music production in secondary schools. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59, 21–43. doi:10.1177/0022429410396095
2.
AbramoJ. M.AustinS. C. (2014). The trumpet metaphor: A narrative of a teacher’s mid-career pedagogical change from formal to informal learning practices. Research Studies in Music Education, 36(1), 57–73. doi:10.1177/1321103X14528454
3.
AbrilC. R. (2009). Responding to culture in the instrumental music programme: A teacher’s journey. Music Education Research, 11(1), 77–91. doi:10.1080/14613800802699176
4.
AllsupR. E.WesterlundH.ShiehE. (2012). Youth culture and secondary education. In McPhersonG.WelchG. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music education (Vol. 1, pp. 460–475). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199730810.013.0028
5.
BarrettJ. R. (2014). Case study design in music education. In ConwayC. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research in American music education (pp. 113–132). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199844272.001.0001
6.
BoespflugG. (1999). Popular music and the instrumental ensemble: Music educators can make use of student-composed music in popular styles to teach musicianship and skill in the use of recording technology. Music Educators Journal, 85(6), 33–37. doi:10.2307/3399519
7.
BreslerL. (1998). The genre of school music and its shaping by meso, micro, and macro contexts. Research Studies in Music Education, 11(1), 2–18. doi:10.1177/1321103X9801100102
8.
ButlerD. (2009). Do we teach about or how-to? Another approach to teaching popular music at high school level. The Mountain Lake Reader, 5, 112–113.
9.
BuzzaT. (2009). The Junkyard Symphony and popular music song writing. The Mountain Lake Reader, 5, 114–115.
10.
CampbellM.ThompsonL.BarrettJ. (2010). Constructing a personal orientation to music teaching. New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
DavisK. S. (2003). “Change is hard”: What science teachers are telling us about reform and teacher learning of innovative practices. Science Education, 87(1), 3–30. doi:10.1002/sce.10037
13.
DavisS. G. (2005). “That thing you do!”: Compositional processes of a rock band. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 6(16), 1–19. Retrieved from http://www.ijea.org/v6n16/
14.
FeldmanA. (2000). Decision making in the practical domain: A model of practical conceptual change. Science Education, 84, 606–623. doi:10.1002/1098-237X(200009)84:5<606:: AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-R
15.
GardnerR. (2008). Rock ‘n’ roll high school: A genre comes of age in the curriculum. In ClementsA. (Ed.), Alternative approaches in music education: Case studies (pp. 83–94). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
16.
GreenL. (2008). Music, informal learning and the school: A new classroom pedagogy. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Group.
17.
HargreavesA. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the Postmodern Age. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
18.
HargreavesA. (Ed.). (2005). Extending educational change: International handbook of educational change. Boston, MA: Springer.
19.
HargreavesD. J.MarshallN. A. (2003). Developing identities in music education. Music Education Research, 5(3), 263–273. doi:10.1080/1461380032000126355
20.
HargreavesD. J.NorthA. C. (Eds.). (1997). The social psychology of music. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
21.
HessJ. (2013). Radical musicking: Challenging dominant paradigms in elementary music education (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3665994).
22.
JaffursS. E. (2004). The impact of informal learning practices in the classroom, or how I learned how to teach from a garage band. International Journal of Music Education, 22(3), 189–200. doi:10.1177/0255761404047401
23.
KastnerJ. (2012). Exploring informal music pedagogy in a professional development community of elementary music teachers (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3548741).
24.
McPhailG. (2013). The canon or the kids: Teachers and the recontextualisation of classical and popular music in the secondary school curriculum. Research Studies in Music Education, 35(1), 7–20. doi:10.1177/1321103X13483083
25.
MillerL. (2005). Redefining teachers, reculturing schools: Connections, commitments and challenges. In HargreavesA. (Ed.), Extending educational change: International handbook of educational change (pp. 249–263). Boston, MA: Springer.
26.
NorthA. C.HargreavesD. J.O’NeillS. A. (2000). The importance of music to adolescents. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(2), 255–272. doi:10.1348/000709900158083
27.
PhillipsK. H. (2008). Exploring research in music education and music therapy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
RandlesC. (2013). A theory of change in music education. Music Education Research, 15(4), 471–485. doi:10.1080/14613808.2013.813926
30.
RegelskiT. A. (2014). Resisting elephants lurking in the music education classroom. Music Educators Journal, 100(4), 77–86. doi:10.1177/0027432114531798
31.
ReimerB. (2012). Another perspective: Struggling toward wholeness in music education. Music Educators Journal, 99(2), 25–29. doi:10.1177/0027432112463856
32.
RentzE. (1994). Music opinions and preferences of high school students in select and nonselect choruses. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 121, 16–28.
33.
RoeK. (1985). Swedish youth and music: Listening patterns and motivations. Communication Research, 12(3), 353–362. doi:10.1177/009365085012003007
34.
RuthmannS. A. (2006). Negotiating learning and teaching in a music technology lab: Curricular, pedagogical, and ecological issues (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3401372).
35.
SpruceG.OdenaO. (2012). Commentary: Music learning and teaching during adolescence: Ages 12–18. In McPhersonG.WelchG. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music education (Vol. 1, pp. 437–440). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
36.
StakeR. E. (2000). Case studies. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 134–164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
ThibeaultM. D. (2013). Quite a lot on some problems with—and just a little on the hopes for—secondary general music with regards to culturally responsive and respectful music education. General Music Today, 26(3), 35–38. doi:10.1177/1048371313476296
38.
TobiasE. (2010). Crossfading and plugging in: Secondary students’ engagement and learning in a songwriting and technology class (Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3402496).
39.
WilliamsD. A. (2007). What are music educators doing and how well are we doing it?Music Educators Journal, 94(1), 18–23. doi:10.1177/002743210709400105
40.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
ZemelmanS.DanielsH.HydeA. (2005). Best practice: Today’s standards for teaching and learning in America’s schools (3rd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
