As the number of adults seeking to learn the piano increases, so too does the need for piano teachers to understand how to better facilitate their learning. Self-direction is an oft-cited requirement of adult learning, but one that is often absent from piano studios. This practitioner-based research investigates the role of the teacher in fostering and supporting self-direction, empowering adult piano students to take ownership of their learning. It offers pedagogical insights into the author’s experiences within her own piano studio and details the practical application of theories and strategies offered within the fields of piano pedagogy and adult learning.
This study finds that fostering self-direction is more complex than offering the balance between guidance and freedom that some experts suggest. It also requires strong student–teacher rapport, supporting and building students’ self-efficacy and being willing to set aside expectations. This was made possible by implementing transformative pedagogical strategies, such as effective questioning, collaborative discussions and adapting the structure of lessons. While the author’s journey is uniquely her own, the approaches used to engage adult students with their learning, and the use of reflective practice as professional development, may be of interest to other studio instrumental teachers.
AkellaD. (2010). Learning together: Kolb’s experiential theory and its application. Journal of Management and Organization, 16(1), 100–112. doi:10.5172/jmo.16.1.100
2.
BathgateM.Sims-KnightJ.SchunnC. (2012). Thoughts on thinking: Engaging novice music students in metacognition. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(3), 403–409. doi:10.1002/acp.1842
3.
BelzerA. (2004). “It’s not like normal school”: The role of prior learning contexts in adult learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 55(1), 41–59. doi:10.1177/0741713604268893
4.
BiggsJ. B.TangC. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). New York, NY: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, McGraw Hill.
5.
BowlesC. L. (2010). Special topics—Teachers of adult music learners: An assessment of characteristics and instructional practices, preparation, and needs. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 28(2), 50–59. doi:10.1177/8755123310361762
6.
BurwellK. (2005). A degree of independence: Teachers’ approaches to instrumental tuition in a university college. British Journal of Music Education, 22(3), 199–215. doi:10.1017/S0265051705006601
7.
CareyG. M.BridgstockR.TaylorP.McWilliamE.GrantC. (2013). Characterising one-to-one conservatoire teaching: Some implications of a quantitative analysis. Music Education Research, 15(3), 357–368. doi:10.1080/14613808.2013.824954
8.
ChenH. (1996). An investigation of self-directed learning among non-music major adult piano learners in one-to-one piano instruction (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (UMI No. 9635962)
9.
CleaverD.BallantyneJ. (2014). Teachers’ views of constructivist theory: A qualitative study illuminating relationships between epistemological understanding and music teaching practice. International Journal of Music Education, 32(2), 228–241. doi:10.1177/0255761413508066
10.
CooperT. L. (2001). Adults’ perceptions of piano study: Achievements and experiences. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49(2), 156–168. doi:10.2307/3345867
DerryS. J. (Ed.). (2007). Guidelines for video research in education: Recommendations from an expert panel. Chicago, IL: NORC at the University of Chicago.
13.
DweckC. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
14.
DweckC. S.MasterA. (2012). Self-theories motivate self-regulated learning. In ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. H. (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 31–52). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15.
ElderL.PaulR. (2010). The art of asking essential questions (5th ed.). Tomales, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
16.
EllisC.BochnerA. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp.733–768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
FeredayJ.Muir-CochraneE. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. doi:10.1177/160940690600500107
18.
FlyvbjergB. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
19.
GelderT. V. (2005). Teaching critical thinking: Some lessons from cognitive science. College Teaching, 53(1), 41–46. doi:10.2307/27559216
20.
HollingsworthH. (2005). Learning about teaching and teaching about learning: Using video data for research and professional development. Paper presented atUsing Data to Support Learning: 10th Conference of the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER), Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1015&context=research_conference_2005
21.
JarvisP. (2010). Adult education and lifelong learning: Theory and practice (4th ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
22.
JørgensenH. (2004). Strategies for individual practice. In WilliamsonA. (Ed.), Musical excellence: Strategies and techniques to enhance performance (pp.85–104). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23.
KnowlesM. S.HoltonE. F.IIISwansonR. A. (2011). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (7th ed.). London, UK: Elsevier.
24.
KolbD. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25.
KreberC. (2001). Leaning experientially through case studies? A conceptual analysis. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 217–228. doi:10.1080/13562510120045203
26.
LehmannA. C.SlobodaJ. A.WoodyR. H. (2007). Psychology for musicians: Understanding and acquiring the skills. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
LeyK.YoungD. B. (2001). Instructional principles for self-regulation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 93–103. doi:10.1007/bf02504930
28.
LoughranJ.BerryA. (2005). Modelling by teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 193–203. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.12.005
29.
MaehrM. L.PintrichP. R.LinnenbrinkE. A. (2002). Motivation and achievement. In ColwellR.RichardsonC. P. (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 348–372). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
30.
MarisB. E. (2000). Making music at the piano: Learning strategies for adult students. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31.
MayerR. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14
McPhersonG. E.ZimmermanB. J. (2002). Self-regulation of musical learning. In ColwellR.RichardsonC. (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning: A project of the Music Educators National Conference (pp. 327–347). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35.
MerriamS. B.CaffarellaR. S.BaumgartnerL. M. (2012). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
36.
MezirowJ. (2000). Learning to think like an adult. In MezirowJ. (Ed.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp.3–33). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
37.
MezirowJ. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(1), 58–63. doi:10.1177/1541344603252172
38.
Mizok-TaylorR. J. (2008). Promoting self-directed learning in adult piano instruction (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (UMI No. 3376459)
39.
NelsonR. (2013). Conceptual frameworks for PaR and related pedagogy: From “hard facts” to “liquid knowing.” In Practice as research in the arts: Principles, protocols, pedagogies, resistances (pp. 48–70). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
40.
RichardsonL. (2003). Writing: A method of inquiry. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 959–978).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
RichardsonV. (1994). Conducting research on practice. Educational Researcher, 23(5), 5–10. doi:10.3102/0013189X023005005
42.
SiebenalerD. J. (1997). Analysis of teacher–student interactions in the piano lessons of adults and children. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45(1), 6–20. doi:10.2307/3345462
SpeerD. R. (1994). An analysis of sequential patterns of instruction in piano lessons. Journal of Research in Music Education, 42(1), 14–26. doi:10.2307/3345333
45.
SwensonT. S. (2006). Profiles of career-aged keyboard students: Attitudes, preferences, and demographics (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest database. (UMI No. 3211367)
46.
TaylorA. (2011). Older amateur keyboard players learning for self-fulfilment. Psychology of Music, 39(3), 345–363. doi:10.1177/0305735610376262
47.
TaylorA.HallamS. (2008). Understanding what it means for older students to learn basic musical skills on a keyboard instrument. Music Education Research, 10(2), 285–306. doi:10.1080/14613800802079148
48.
TaylorE. W. (2008). Transformative learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 119, 5–15. doi:10.1002/ace.301
49.
TrippT.RichP. (2012). Using video to analyze one’s own teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 678–704. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01234.x
50.
UszlerM.UpitisR. (2000). The adult student. In UszlerM.GordonS.SmithS. M. (Eds.), The well-tempered keyboard teacher (pp. 55–78). Belmont, CA: Schirmer.
51.
WilsonA. L.HayesE. R. (2002). From the editors: The problem of (learning in–from–to) experience. Adult Education Quarterly, 52(3), 173–175. doi:10.1177/0741713602052003001
52.
WristenB. (2006). Demographics and motivation of adult group piano students. Music Education Research, 8(3), 387–406. doi:10.1080/14613800600957503
53.
ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. H. (2012). Motivation: An essential dimension of self-regulated learning. In ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. H. (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 1–30). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
