This pilot study analyzed the learning activities of adult musicians during the composition of a new musical work through online collaboration. The participants interacted in a virtual environment using synchronous and asynchronous tools to develop the composition project. The study utilized a mixed method descriptive design through video observation of the participants’ interactions during the online activities. In addition, individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with the participants after the learning sessions to analyze the method of work and the processes adopted. The findings showed that (1) the participants successfully completed the composing task in the virtual environment; (2) the following five learning activities were observed during the video recording analysis: experimenting, listening/evaluating, constructing, playing and technical issues; (3) the following two themes emerged from the semi-structured interview analysis: activities and processes. The results are discussed considering the educational implications of the processes activated during the activities.
AllsupR. E. (2003). Mutual learning and democratic action in instrumental music education. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51(1), 24–37.
2.
BiasuttiM. (2012). Group music composing strategies: A case study within a rock band. British Journal of Music Education, 29(3), 343–357.
3.
BiasuttiM. (2013a). Improvisation in dance education: Teacher views. Research in Dance Education, 14 (2), 120–140.
4.
BiasuttiM. (2013b). Orchestra rehearsal strategies: Conductor and performer views. Musicae Scientiae, 17 (1), 57–71.
5.
BiasuttiM. (2015). Creativity in virtual spaces: Communication modes employed during collaborative online music composition, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 17, 117–129.
6.
BiasuttiM. (2017). A comparative analysis of forums and wikis as tools for online collaborative learning, Computers & Education, 111, 158–171.
7.
BowmanJ. (2014). Online learning in music: Foundations, frameworks, and practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press, USA.
8.
BrownA. R.DillonS. C. (2012). Collaborative digital media performance with generative music systems. In McPhersonG.WelchG. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Music Education (Vol. 2, pp. 549–566). New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
BurnardP.YounkerB. A. (2008). Investigating children’s musical interactions within the activities systems of group composing and arranging: An application of Engeström’s Activity Theory. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 60–74.
10.
CayariC. (2011). The YouTube effect: How YouTube has provided new ways to consume, create, and share music. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 12(6), 1–30.
11.
DillonT. (2003). Collaborating and creating using music technologies. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(8), 893–897.
12.
FautleyM. (2004). Teacher intervention strategies in the composing processes of lower secondary school students. International Journal of Music Education, 22, 201–218.
13.
GreenL. (2009). Music, informal learning and the school: A new classroom pedagogy. Aldershot: Ashgate.
14.
HewittA. (2002). A comparative analysis of process and product with specialist and generalist pre-service teachers involved in a group composition activity. Music Education Research, 4, 25–36.
15.
HopkinsM. T. (2015). Collaborative composing in high school string chamber music ensembles. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62(4), 405–424.
16.
JaffursS. E. (2004). The impact of informal music learning practices in the classroom, or how I learned how to teach from a garage band. International Journal of Music Education, 22(3), 189–200.
17.
KennyA. (2014). “Collaborative creativity” within a jazz ensemble as a musical and social practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 1–8.
18.
KruseN. B.HarlosS. C.CallahanR. M.HerringM. L. (2013). Skype music lessons in the academy: Intersections of music education, applied music and technology. Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 6(1), 43–60.
19.
KumpB.MoskaliukJ.DennerleinS.LeyT. (2013). Tracing knowledge co-evolution in a realistic course setting: A wiki-based field experiment. Computers & Education, 69, 60–70.
20.
MichielseM.ParttiH. (2015). Producing a meaningful difference: The significance of small creative acts in composing within online participatory remix practices. International Journal of Community Music, 8(1), 27–40.
21.
ParttiH.WesterlundH. (2013). Envisioning collaborative composing in music education: Learning and negotiation of meaning in operabyyou.com. British Journal of Music Education, 30, 207–222.
22.
PikeP. D.ShoemakerK. (2013). The effect of distance learning on acquisition of piano sight-reading skills. Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 6(2), 147–162.
23.
Randles, C. (Ed.). (2015). Music Education. Navigating the Future. New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
RuismäkiH.JuvonenA.LehtonenK. (2012). The Internet as a Learning Environment in guitar playing: Rane’s search for information and expertise. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 45, 381–390.
25.
RuthmannS. A.HebertD. G. (2012). Music learning and new media in virtual and online environments. In McPhersonG.WelchG. (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Music Education (Vol. 2; pp. 567–583). New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
SalavuoM. (2006). Open and informal online communities as forums of collaborative musical activities and learning. British Journal of Music Education, 23(3), 253–71.
27.
SawyerR. K. (2008). Learning music from collaboration. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(1), 50–59.
28.
SeddonF.A.BiasuttiM. (2009). Participant approaches to and reflections on learning to play a 12-bar blues in an asynchronous e-learning environment. International Journal of Music Education, 27(3), 189–203.
29.
ThibeaultM. D. (2012). Music education in the postperformance world. In McPhersonG. E.WelchG. F. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Music Education (Vol.2; pp. 517–530). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
ThorgersenK.ZandénO. (2014). The Internet as teacher, Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 7(2), 233–244.
31.
TobiasE. S. (2012). Hybrid spaces and hyphenated musicians: Secondary students’ musical engagement in a songwriting and technology course. Music Education Research, 14(3), 329–46.
32.
VakevaL. (2009). The world well lost, found: Reality and authenticity in Green’s “New Classroom Pedagogy”. Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education, 8(2), 7–34.
33.
VeblenK. K. (2012). Adult music learning in formal, nonformal, and informal contexts. In McPhersonG. E.WelchG. F. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Music Education (Vol. 2; pp. 243–256). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
VeblenK. K.WaldronJ. L. (2012). Fast forward: Emerging trends in community music. In McPhersonG. E.WelchG. F. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Music Education (Vol. 2; pp. 203–219). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
WegerifR. (2006). A dialogic understanding of the relationship between CSCL and teaching thinking skills. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 143–157.
36.
WaldronJ. (2013). YouTube, fanvids, forums, vlogs and blogs: Informal music learning in a convergent on-and offline music community. International Journal of Music Education, 31(1), 91–105.
