Even though there are demonstrated benefits of using online tools to support student musicians, there is a persistent challenge of providing sufficient and effective professional development for independent music teachers to use such tools successfully. This paper describes several methods for helping teachers use an online tool called iSCORE, including embedded online support, targeted email messages, webinars, and face-to-face workshops. Using contemporary frameworks for characterizing continuing professional development, the success of each of these teaching approaches, separately and in combination, is considered through an examination of teacher feedback, uptake of the tool by students, and the interview data from an advisory board made up of teachers, educators, software designers and developers, publishers, and business leaders. Inherent tensions and difficulties in designing appropriate professional development are discussed.
BingimlasK. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, & Technology Education, 5, 235–245.
2.
CampbellP. S. (1991). Lessons from the world. New York, NY: Schirmer Books.
3.
CubanL. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
4.
DignathC.BüttnerG.LangfeldtH. P. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 101–129.
5.
DuranM.BrunvandS.EllsworthJ.ŞendağS. (2012). Impact of research-based professional development: Investigation of inservice teacher learning and practice in wiki integration. Journal of Inservice Teacher Learning, 44(4), 313–334.
6.
FeldmanS. (2010). RCM: A quantitative investigation of teachers associated with the RCM exam process. Toronto, ON: Susan Feldman & Associates.
7.
FishmanB.MarxR.BestS.TalR. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 643–658.
8.
GaretM. F.PorterA. C.DesimoneL.BirmanB. F.YoonK. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945.
9.
HunzickerJ. (2011). Effective professional development for teachers: A checklist. Professional Development in Education, 37(2), 177–179.
10.
KennedyA. (2005). Models of continuing professional development: A framework for analysis. Journal of In-service Education, 31, 235–250.
11.
KennellR. (2002). Systematic research in studio instruction in music. In ColwellR.RichardsonC. (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 243–256). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12.
KoehlerM. J.MishraP. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In ColbertJ. A.BoydK. E.ClarkK. A.GuanS.HarrisJ. B.KellyM. A.ThompsonA. D. (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3–30). New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
McPhersonG. E.DavidsonJ. W.FaulknerR. (2012). Music in our lives: Redefining musical development, ability and identity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14.
McPhersonG. E.RenwickJ. M. (2011). Self-regulation and mastery of musical skills. In ZimmermanB. J.ShunkD. H. (Eds.), The handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 234–248). New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
McPhersonG. E.ZimmermanB. J. (2011). Self-regulation of musical learning: A social cognitive perspective on developing performance skills. In ColwellR.WebsterP. R. (Eds.), The MENC handbook of research on music learning. Volume 2: Applications (pp. 130–175). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
16.
MeyerE. J.AbramiP. C.WadeA.AslanO.DeaultL. (2010). Improving literacy and metacognition with electronic portfolios: Teaching and learning with ePEARL. Computers & Education, 55, 84–91. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.005
17.
MeyerE. J.AbramiP. C.WadeA.ScherzerR. (2010). Electronic portfolios in the classroom: Factors impacting teachers’ integration of new technologies and new pedagogies. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(2), 191–207.
18.
MoursundD.BielefeldtT. (1999). A national survey on information technology in teacher education. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Education Technology.
19.
MouzaC. (2009). Does research-based professional development make a difference? A longitudinal investigation of teacher learning in technology integration. Teachers College Record, 111, 1195–1241.
20.
PattonM. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
RussellM.BebellD.O’DwyerL.O’ConnorK. (2003). Examining teacher technology use: Implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297–310.
22.
SavageJ. (2007). Reconstructing music education through ICT. Research in Education, 78, 65–77.
23.
ShulmanL. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
24.
StephensA. C.HartmannC. E. (2004). A successful professional development project’s failure to promote online discussion about teaching mathematics with technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(1), 57–73.
25.
StesA.Min-LeliveldM.GijbelsD.Van PetegemP. (2010). The impact of instructional development in higher education: The state-of-the-art of the research. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 25–49.
26.
UpitisR. (2001). Spheres of influence: The interplay between music research, technology, heritage, and music education. International Journal of Music Education, 37, 44–58.
27.
UpitisR.AbramiP. C.BrookJ.TroopM.CatalanoL. (2010). Using ePEARL for music teaching: A case study. In Pérez-BustamanteG.PhysavatK.FerreriaF. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Association for Scientific Knowledge Conference (pp. 36–45). Seville, Spain: IASK Press.
28.
UpitisR.AbramiP. C.BrookJ.TroopM.VarelaW. (2012). Learning to play a musical instrument with a digital portfolio tool. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 9, 1–15.
29.
UpitisR.BrookJ.AbramiP. C. (2014). Enhancing music learning with digital tools: A case study of a student using iSCORE. Journal of Literature and Arts Studies, 4, 489–497.
30.
UpitisR.BrookJ.AbramiP. C.VarelaW.ElsterA. (2012). Revitalizing studio music learning through digital portfolios. Proceedings from the Twenty-fourth International Seminar on Research in Music Education (pp. 239–246). Thessaloniki, Greece: University of Macedonia.
31.
UpitisR.WynnpaulV.AbramiP. C. (2013). Enriching the time between music lessons with a digital learning portfolio. Canadian Music Educator, 54(4), 22–28.
32.
WalshC. S.PowerT.KhatoonM.BiswasS. K.PaulA. K.SarkarB. C.GriffithsM. (2013). The ‘trainer in your pocket’: Mobile phones within a teacher continuing professional development program in Bangladesh. Professional Development in Education, 39, 186–200. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2013.766232
33.
WozneyL.VenkateshV.AbramiP. C. (2006). Implementing computer technologies: Teachers’ perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14, 173–207.
34.
YinR. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
