The purpose of this study was to investigate effects of music notation reinforcement on aural memory for melodies. Participants were 41 undergraduate and graduate music majors in a within-subjects design. Experimental trials tested melodic memory through a sequence of target melodies, distraction melodies, and matched and unmatched answer choices. Target melodies were presented either aurally only, or aurally with matching notation. Results of a paired samples t-test revealed no significant difference in experimental test scores based on presentation format, suggesting that music notation reinforcement of melodies does not affect aural memory for those melodies. Recommendations for further research include an aural-visual melodic memory test paired with a survey of participant learning modalities; a survey of successful melodic memory strategies employed by aural skills students; and longitudinal studies of visual imagery applied to aural skills tasks. Implications for music education at all levels center on the need to cultivate strong cognitive relationships between visual and aural aspects of music.
BeckettC. A. (1997). Directing student attention during two-part dictation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 613–625.
2.
BeheshtiS. (2009). Improving studio music teaching through understanding learning styles. International Journal of Music Education, 27, 107–115.
3.
BoltzM. G.EbendorfB.FieldB. (2009). Audiovisual interactions: The impact of visual information on music perception and memory. Music Perception, 27, 43–59.
4.
BurtonL. J. (2003). Examining the relation between visual imagery and spatial ability tests. International Journal of Testing, 3, 277–291.
5.
CassidyJ. W. (2001). Listening maps: Undergraduate students’ ability to interpret various iconic representations. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 19(2), 15–19.
6.
CenterY.FreemanL.RobertsonG.OuthredL. (1999). The effect of visual imagery training on the reading and listening comprehension of low listening comprehenders in Year 2. Journal of Research in Reading, 22, 241–256.
HalpernA. R. (1988). Mental scanning in auditory imagery for songs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 434–443.
9.
HarrisonC. S. (1990). Relationships between grades in the components of freshman music theory and selected background variables. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 175–186.
10.
HishitaniS. (1990). Imagery experts: How do expert abacus operators process imagery?Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 33–46.
11.
IwamiyaS. (1994). Interactions between auditory and visual processing when listening to music in an audiovisual context: 1. Matching. 2. Audio quality. Psychomusicology, 13, 133–154.
12.
KarpinskiG. S. (2000). Aural skills acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13.
KillianJ. N.HenryM. L. (2005). A comparison of successful and unsuccessful strategies in individual sight-singing preparation and performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 51–66.
14.
LarsonR. C. (1977). Relationships between melodic error detection, melodic dictation, and melodic sightsinging. Journal of Research in Music Education, 25, 264–271.
15.
LongP. A. (1977). Relationships between pitch memory in short melodies and selected factors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 25, 272–282.
16.
LucasJ. R.GromkoJ. E. (2007). The relationship of musical pattern discrimination skill and phonemic awareness in beginning readers. Contributions to Music Education, 34, 9–17.
17.
MadsenC. K.StaumM. J. (1983). Discrimination and interference in the recall of melodic stimuli. Journal of Research in Music Education, 31, 15–31.
18.
McClungA. C. (2001). Sight-singing systems: Current practice and survey of all-state choristers. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 20(1), 3–8.
19.
MillerG. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
20.
MikumoM. (1994). Motor encoding strategy for pitches of melodies. Music Perception, 12, 175–197.
21.
MorrisonS. J.DemorestS. M.AylwardE. H.CramerS. C.MaravillaK. R. (2003). fMRI investigation of cross-cultural music comprehension. Neuroimage, 20, 378–384.
22.
PembrookR. G. (1986). Interference of the transcription process and other selected variables on perception and memory during melodic dictation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34, 238–261.
23.
PembrookR. G. (1987). The effect of vocalization on melodic memory conservation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 35, 155–169.
24.
PintoM.TallD. (2002). Building formal mathematics on visual imagery: A case study and a theory. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22(1), 2–10.
25.
SaariluomaP.KalakoskiV. (1997). Skilled imagery and long-term working memory. The American Journal of Psychology, 110, 177–201.
26.
SaariluomaP.KalakoskiV. (1998). Apperception and imagery in blindfold chess. Memory, 6(1), 67–90.
27.
SegalS. J.FusellaV. (1970). Influence of imaged pictures and sounds on detection of visual and auditory signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 458–464.
28.
SheldonD. A. (1998). Effects of contextual sight-singing and aural skills training on error detection abilities. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 384–395.
29.
TelescoP. (1991). Contextual ear training. Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy, 5, 179–190.
30.
ThompsonK. A. (2004). Thinking in sound: A qualitative study of metaphors for pitch perception. Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy, 18, 81–107.
31.
WeberR.HarnishR. (1974). Visual imagery for words – the Hebb test. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 409–414.
32.
WilsonS. J.SalingM. M. (2008). Contributions of the right and left mesial temporal lobes to music memory: Evidence from melodic learning difficulties. Music Perception25, 303–314.
