The purpose of this study was to investigate possible predictive relationships between interval identification and melodic dictation performance on tasks where students identify short pitch spans after a brief tonicization. College musicians (N = 35) completed an interval identification test and a series of melodic dictation tasks. Results indicated that interval identification and melodic dictation tests reflected a battery of items ranging from very easy to very difficult with acceptable Cronbach’s α levels. We conducted a two-stage hierarchical regression analysis to examine the extent to which interval identification served as a predictor of melodic dictation accuracy while controlling for selected music and demographic variables. Results indicated that interval identification served as a significant predictor of melodic dictation scores, contributing 28.9% of the variance in melodic dictation scores while controlling for musical experience variables. The analysis indicated a dictation task by interval ability interaction based on grouping by lower, mid-, and upper performing groups on the interval identification test. Issues in measurement of melodic dictation accuracy and strategies that affect the development of melodic dictation skills are discussed.
AllenM. J.YenW. M. (2001). Introduction to measurement theory. Waveland Press.
2.
BuonviriN. O. (2014). An exploration of undergraduate music majors’ melodic dictation strategies. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 33(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123314521036
3.
BuonviriN. O. (2015a). Building better dictation skills. Rowman & Littlefield.
4.
BuonviriN. O. (2015b). Effects of a preparatory singing pattern on melodic dictation success. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63(1), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/002249415570754
5.
BuonviriN. O. (2017). Effects of two listening strategies for melodic dictation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 65(3), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429417728925
6.
BuonviriN. O. (2019). Effects of silence, sound, and singing on melodic dictation accuracy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 66(4), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429418801333
7.
BuonviriN. O.PaneyA. S. (2015). Melodic dictation instruction: A survey of Advanced Placement music theory teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63(2), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429415584141
8.
ClementsP. A. (2003). The effect of phrase expansion recognition on melodic dictation accuracy [Publication No. 3085587] [Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri-Kansas City]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
9.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10.
CourvilleT.ThompsonB. (2001). Use of structure coefficients in published multiple regression articles: β is not enough. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(2), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164401612006
11.
DemorestS. (1998). Improving sight-singing performance in the choral rehearsal: The effect of individual testing. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46(2), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345622
12.
DemorestS.ClementsA. C. (2007). Vocal pitch production and perception among middle school male singers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55(3), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224294075500302
13.
DemorestS.NicholsB. E.PfordresherP. (2018). The effect of focused instruction on young children’s singing accuracy. Psychology of Music46(4), 488–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735617713120
14.
EngleR. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00160
HoppeK. M. (1991). The melodic dictation strategies of musicians, and common pitch and rhythm errors [Publication No. 9128254] [Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
19.
KillianJ.HenryM. (2005). A comparison of successful and unsuccessful strategies in individual sight-singing preparation and performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/002242940505300105
20.
KrumhanslC. L.KesslerE. J. (1982). Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organization in a spatial representation of musical keys. Psychological Review, 89(4), 334–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.89.4.334
21.
LarsonR. C. (1977). Relationships between melodic error detection, melodic dictation, and melodic sightsinging. Journal of Research in Music Education, 25(4), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345267
22.
MadsenC. K.StaumM. J. (1983). Discrimination and interference in the recall of melodic stimuli. Journal of Research in Music Education, 31(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345107
23.
NicholsB. E. (2016). Task-based variability in children’s singing accuracy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 64(3), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429416666054
24.
NicholsB. E.WangS. (2016). The effect of repeated attempts and test-retest reliability in children’s singing accuracy. Musicae Scientiae, 20(4), 551–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864916638914
25.
NicholsB. E.WöllnerC.HalpernA. R. (2018). Score one for jazz: Working memory in classical and jazz musicians. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, & Brain, 28(2), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/pmu0000211
26.
NorrisC. E. (2003). The relationship between sight singing achievement and melodic dictation achievement. Contributions to Music Education, 30(1), 39–53.
PaneyA. S.BuonviriN. O. (2014). Teaching melodic dictation in advanced placement music theory. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61(4), 396–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429413508411
29.
PaneyA. S.BuonviriN. O. (2017). Developing melodic dictation pedagogy: A survey of college theory instructors. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 36(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123316686815
30.
ParncuttR. (2011). The tonic as triad: Key profiles as pitch salience profiles of tonic triads. Music Perception, 28(4), 333–336. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2011.28.4.333
31.
PembrookR. G. (1984). The interference of the transcription process and other selected variables on memory during melodic dictation [Publication No. 8427320] [Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
32.
PembrookR. G. (1986). Interference of the transcription process and other selected variables on perception and memory during melodic dictation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34(4), 238–261. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345259
33.
PowellJ. (2013). Melodic dictation: An examination of strategy and time usage by college music students [Publication No. 1543369] [Master’s thesis, Southern Methodist University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
34.
SinkP. E. (1983). Effects of rhythmic and melodic alterations on rhythmic perception. Journal of Research in Music Education, 31(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345214
35.
SmallN. J. H. (1980). Marginal skewness and kurtosis in testing multivariate normality. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C, 29(1), 85–87. https://doi.org/10.2307/2346414
36.
StambaughL.NicholsB. E. (2020). The relationships among interval identification, pitch error detection, and stimulus timbre by pre-service teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 67(4), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429419885931
37.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson.
38.
TaggartC. C.TaggartB. F. (1994). Sightsinging systems: A survey of American colleges and universities. Southeastern Journal of Music Education, 6, 194–209.
39.
WilliamsD. B. (1975). Short-term retention of pitch sequence. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345203
40.
WöllnerC.HalpernA. (2015). Attentional flexibility and memory capacity in conductors and pianists. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 78(1), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-0150989-z
41.
WuthrichC. E.TunksT. W. (1989). The influence of presentation time asynchrony on music interval perception. Psychomusicology, 8(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0094233
42.
ZiglariL. (2017). Interpreting multiple regression results: β weights and structure coefficients. General Linear Model Journal, 43(2), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.31523/glmj.043002.002
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
