During this heuristic phenomenological inquiry, we examined our lived experiences as five women (three doctoral students, two early career faculty) in the process of becoming music teacher educators participating in a year-long, online, group-facilitated professional development community (PDC). Data included recorded meetings via Skype, journal entries via a private Facebook blog, and written introductory and final reflection statements. The three core themes that emerged from the data were as follows: (a) self-doubt and fear of failure as researchers; (b) struggle to establish balance; and (c) the PDC as a safe place. The essence of our lived experience in the group was developing our identities as music teacher educators through interactions in our PDC, which was a safe place for us to discuss our thoughts, concerns, and insecurities. We offer suggestions for PDCs, including future research and participation, as well as international sharing, collaboration, and community.
AustinA. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty. The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 94–122.
2.
BarnacleR.MewburnI. (2010). Learning networks and the journey of ‘becoming doctor’. Studies in Higher Education, 35, 433–444.
3.
CarusoJ. J. (1998). What cooperating teacher case studies reveal about their phases of development as supervisors of student teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 21, 119–132.
4.
ColeA. L.KnowlesJ. G. (2000). Researching teacher development through reflexive inquiry. Nedham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
5.
ConklingS. W.HenryW. (2008). Doctoral students in music and their socialization into teaching. In ThompsonL. K.CampbellM. R. (Eds.), Diverse methodologies in the study of music teaching and learning (pp. 183–200). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
6.
ConwayC. M.ErosJ.PellegrinoK.WestC. (2010). The role of graduate and undergraduate interactions in the development of preservice and music teacher educator identity: A self-study in music teacher education. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 183, 49–64.
7.
ConwayC. M.HodgmanT. M. (2008). Teaching music in higher education. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
9.
DravesT. J.KoopsL. H. (2009, September). Peer Mentoring: Key to New Music Teacher Educator Success. Session presented at the Symposium of the Society for Music Teacher Education, University of North Carolina-Greensboro, Greensboro, NC.
10.
DravesT. J.KoopsL. H. (2011). Peer mentoring: Key to new music teacher educator success. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 20, 67–77.
11.
DriscollL. G.ParkesK. A.Tilley-LubbsG. A.BrillJ. M.Pitts BannisterV. R. (2009). Navigating the lonely sea: Peer mentoring and collaboration among aspiring women scholars. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 17, 5–21.
12.
GardnerS. K. (2007). I heard it through the grapevine: Doctoral student socialization in chemistry and history. Higher Education, 54, 723–740.
13.
GopaulB. (2011). Distinction in doctoral education: Using Bourdieu’s tools to assess the socialization of doctoral students. Equity & Excellence in Education, 44, 10–21.
14.
HusserlE. (1922/1970). The crisis of the European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. (CarrD. Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
15.
JorgensenE. R. (2010). School music education and change. Music Educators Journal, 96, 21–27.
16.
Koro-LjungbergM.HayesS. (2006). The relational selves of female graduate students during academic mentoring: From dialogue to transformation. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 14, 389–407.
17.
LieberE.WeisnerT. S. (2012). Dedoose (Version 4.1.74) Microsoft, Inc. [Online software]. Retrieved from www.dedoose.com
18.
MishlerE. G. (1991). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
MoustakasC. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
20.
MullenC. (2003). The WIT cohort: A case study of informal doctoral mentoring. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 27, 411–426.
21.
MullenC. A.ForbesS. A. (2000). Untenured faculty: Issues of transition, adjustment and mentorship. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 8, 31–46.
22.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
ReyboldL. E. (2003). Pathways to the professorate: The development of faculty identity in education. Innovative Higher Education, 27, 235–252.
24.
RobertsonD. R. (2003). Making time, making change: Avoiding overload in college teaching. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
25.
SchwartzH. (1996). The changing nature of teacher education. In SikulaJ.ButteryT. J.GuytonE. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 2–13). New York, NY: Macmillan.
26.
Skype (Version 5.3.0.1074) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from www.skype.com
27.
van ManenM. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
28.
ViczkoM.WrightL. L. (2008). Negotiating identities in the transition from graduate student to teacher educator. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 14–26.
29.
ZemekM. D. (2008). The selection and preparation of cooperating teachers in music education. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 17, 7–18.
