Abstract
Background:
Common mental health disorders (CMDs) affect nearly 10% of the population, with the majority (80%) remaining untreated. Culturally relevant counseling approaches can be a means to reach many untreated persons. We describe the development and validation of a socioculturally relevant counseling module based on the
Methods:
The study employed an exploratory research framework to design the counseling module. The module underwent a comprehensive review of the Valmiki
Results:
Based on the results of expert interviews (
Conclusions:
The developed counseling module based on the
This study represents one of the first-ever attempts to develop a module for Ramayana-based counseling interventions in the field of psychiatry in India. It provides a comprehensive guideline on how to implement the Ramayana based counseling module in clinical setting for persons with common mental health disorders in the relevant contexts. The feasibility and efficacy testing of this module will help to establish its worthiness and practical application in the future.Key Messages:
Common mental health disorders (CMDs) are characterized by significant difficulties experienced in emotion regulation. Persons diagnosed with CMDs manifest heightened levels of psychological distress, exerting deleterious effects on their personal, social, and occupational dimensions. 1 The substantial treatment gap of 80.4% indicates that the majority of CMDs remain untreated due to various psychosocial factors such as stigma, lack of awareness, socioeconomic status, and help-seeking behaviors, among others.2,3
Several therapeutic approaches are evidence based in the context of CMDs. Different psychotherapies have demonstrated efficacy and cost-effectiveness in treating CMD conditions such as depression, anxiety, stress-related disorders, and somatoform disorder. 4 These gold standard psychotherapies include psychoanalytical therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), emotional-focused therapy (EFT), brief dynamic therapy (BDT), and interpersonal therapy (IT). Over the past few decades, numerous brief psychotherapies and culturally relevant counseling techniques have emerged for the treatment of CMDs. While these psychotherapies and counseling share the common goal of assisting distressed persons, they differ in the delivery of concepts, methodologies, and techniques. 5 As most of these therapies emphasize the emotional regulation process of persons experiencing distress, they are often effective in helping them cope with various challenges.
Similarly, Indian texts exhibit qualities akin to counseling, offering concepts applicable in clinical and therapeutic settings for the benefit of clients.
6
These therapeutic elements, rooted in Indian scriptures, serve as guiding principles for morality, values, and life management. For example, one of the renowned discourses in Hindu philosophy and psychotherapy comes from the
Some researchers have suggested that narratives and concepts derived from ancient mythology possess therapeutic potential8–11 and can prove effective when used in “appropriate” clinical contexts.6,12,13 An extensive body of literature asserts that the essence of psychotherapy and counseling is embedded within our Indian texts.6,9,14–25 Researchers have delved into Indian epics such as the
Methods
The Institute Ethics Committee (IEC) of the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences reviewed and approved the study. Written informed consent was obtained from expert mental health professionals. The study is registered in the Clinical Trials Registry India (CTRI) under the registration number CTRI/2020/06/025572.
Study Design
The study employed an exploratory research design. The development and validation of the
Phase I—Review of Ramayana
The first author extensively examined both the English and vernacular language (Marathi) versions of the Interaction or dialogues between two individuals Distressful situations Behavioral outcomes result from counseling provided by the characters in
Each review had specific objectives for selecting relevant anecdotes. After each review, the authors, along with their guide and co-guide, rigorously evaluated the outcomes, which included counseling techniques such as anecdotes, narratives, and concepts. These counseling techniques underwent a comprehensive review and consolidation process. Initially grouped into general themes (GT) based on shared emotional contexts, they were further refined by an internal committee member (PS), who merged closely related themes to form specific themes (ST). These specific themes were then carefully examined by external doctoral committee members (DCM) and co-guides to highlight closely associated concepts. Subsequently, the 14 themes, comprising anecdotes, narratives, and concepts, were presented to a panel of experts who needed to be made aware of thematic similarities. This process aimed to ensure clarity and objectivity in the evaluation.
Phase II—Validation from Experts and Finalizing the Techniques
The authors prepared a list and approached mental health professionals using snowball sampling in this study. The inclusion criteria involved mental health professionals with at least five years of clinical experience in Indian psychology and proficiency in English. Maximum variation sampling was employed to ensure a diverse representation of mental health professionals within the sample. A total of 23 experts were contacted, with eight citing busy schedules as the reason for non-participation. Nevertheless, 15 experts consented to participate, comprising three psychiatrists, three clinical psychologists, two psychiatric social workers, and seven professionals with specialized knowledge in Indian psychology and scripture, along with a background in yoga. No incentives or compensation was provided to the expert participants during the data collection process. For the content validity assessment, data were collected from experts through an iterative process, employing two methods: (a) in-depth interviews and (b) content Validation.
In-depth interviews: This qualitative research design employed structured qualitative interviews to facilitate and guide discussions with experts. This phase aims to conduct a content validation process on the culled counseling techniques (anecdotes, narratives, and concepts) from the
It is imperative to emphasize that this phase does not entail data generation, as the cull-out counseling techniques were already identified through an iterative review process in Phase I. Mental health professionals with specialized clinical experience and expertise in Indian psychology and scripture were pivotal in facilitating consensus on themes and refining anecdotes during this phase. Expert (
What is the context/theme?
What emotions are brought forth in the anecdote from the
Do the listed anecdotes, concepts, and narratives from the
What is the process for delivering/providing these techniques? How will these particular techniques help individuals with CMD? Which specific outcomes are likely to improve?
Are there any other concepts, anecdotes, or narratives in the
The interviews, which lasted two to four hours, were conducted over multiple sessions to facilitate comprehensive discussions and collect experts’ perspectives on the applicability of anecdotes in modern counseling. Due to time constraints, all four experts specializing in Indian psychology had to schedule appointments twice each to complete the refinement and validation of the anecdotes. Following these sessions, experts recommended a quantitative approach for content validation of the module, citing the time-consuming nature of in-depth interviews and the potential scheduling difficulties for experts required to attend multiple appointments for refining anecdotes.
Furthermore, these interviews were transcribed and reviewed for consensus on anecdotes. As previously mentioned, each counseling technique (anecdotes, concepts, and narratives) was categorized into 14 themes unfamiliar to the experts. These techniques underwent scrutiny and analysis to assess their agreement with the pre-established themes proposed by the authors before the interviews. The in-depth interview analysis suggests the removal of several anecdotes from the module due to their limited relevance to contemporary illness contexts.
The remaining anecdotes were classified into four groups using the International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10), which included conditions such as depression, anxiety disorders, somatoform disorders, and stress-related disorders. Each diagnosis was associated with an everyday context, followed by supporting anecdotes corresponding to the ICD-10 diagnostic criteria. After refining the anecdotes, the module was structured according to the five phases of the counseling process recommended by the guide. These phases are: Phase I: understanding the problem, which consists of (i) relationship building and (ii) problem assessment; Phase II: goal setting; Phase III: counseling techniques; Phase IV: implementation and change; and Phase V: termination. These phases of the counseling process serve as a valuable framework and guidance in the therapy setting when working with clients.
Content validation: The objective of this phase was to validate the module’s content. To achieve this, a structured Google Form and the Positive rating: very appropriate + appropriate = 1 Neutral rating: neither appropriate nor inappropriate = 2 Negative rating: inappropriate + very inappropriate = 3
Content validity was established through input from 11 experts who evaluated the appropriateness, adequacy, and practicality of calculating the CVR. Lawshe’s CVR table was used to compute each item in the module, with each item achieving a CVR of 0.5 or higher, demonstrating agreement beyond chance among the 11 experts. 33
Results
This study phase encompasses data analysis from in-depth interviews and content validation provided by experts in Indian psychology.
Phase I: Review of Ramayana
A total of
Similarly, the second review of
The objective of the third review was to assess whether the selected anecdotes aligned with the inclusion criteria of counseling definitions, which encompassed interaction or dialogues between two people, distressful situations and the presentation of effective outcomes based on counseling provided by others. The results of this review suggested
In the fourth review, under the guidance of a primary guide and a co-guide (experts in
Reviews of Ramayana.
In the fifth review, the researchers aimed to eliminate counseling techniques related to group counseling, as the study focused solely on individual conversations (dialogues between two people). This review decided to maintain the study’s focus on the dynamics and nuances of one-on-one interactions, ensuring a more targeted analysis of individual counseling scenarios. The results of the fifth review are presented as follows: Bala Kanda had 1 group counseling technique out of 11, Ayodhya Kanda had no group counseling techniques out of 17, Aranya Kanda had 1 out of 12, Kishkindha Kanda had 2 group counseling techniques out of 19, Sundar Kanda had none out of 4, Yudha Kanda had 2 out of 32, and Uttar Kanda had 6 out of 24. Therefore, as a result of this review, the 12 group counseling techniques were excluded from the
Furthermore, 107 anecdotes were retained and are depicted in Table 2. This table illustrates the themes derived through consensus among the authors and two additional experts during the review of anecdotes. Initially, these anecdotes were categorized into general themes (
General Themes Organized into Specific Themes.
Phase II: Validation from Experts and Finalizing the Techniques
This study phase included results from in-depth interviews and content validation from experts in Indian psychology. These mental health professionals had expertise in Indian psychology. Four experts consented to in-depth interviews (
In-depth Interview
An in-depth interview involving four mental health professionals with expertise in Indian psychology was conducted. A total of 107 anecdotes, categorized into 14 themes based on everyday contexts such as emotions, situations, or events, were presented to the experts. This interview aimed to understand the relevance and accuracy of the listed counseling techniques (anecdotes, concepts, and narratives) from the
A total of 52 remaining anecdotes were categorized into four groups as associated with disorders such as depression, anxiety disorder, somatoform, and stress-related disorders using ICD-10 diagnosis criteria. Each diagnosis had everyday contexts, followed by anecdotes supporting the diagnostic criteria per the ICD-10. Depression had 11 everyday contexts followed by 22 anecdotes; anxiety had 10 familiar contexts followed by 11 anecdotes; somatoform disorder had 6 contexts followed by 6 anecdotes; and stress-related disorder had 13 contexts followed by 13 anecdotes. Furthermore, the structure of the counseling module was organized into five phases and forwarded to experts (
Content Validation
A panel of mental health experts conducted the content validation of the
Content Validity Ratio of Ramayana-based Counseling Module.
During validation, experts provided suggestions and comments in a tabular format, organized according to counseling phases. These inputs were carefully considered for incorporation into the module, and the comments provided by the experts are presented in Table 4. Relevant comments were integrated into the module, while irrelevant ones were excluded.
Experts Feedback and Suggestions.
This module is organized to suit various everyday contexts based on ICD-10 diagnosis criteria for persons facing common mental health issues. The counseling techniques were specifically designed for the following diagnoses: F32.0 to F32.1—mild to moderate depression, F41 to F41.9—other anxiety disorders including panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, social phobias, mixed anxiety disorder, F45—somatoform disorder, F43—reaction to severe stress, F43.2—adjustment disorder–acute stress reaction, and F43.1—post-traumatic stress disorder. Table 5 shows the anecdotes applicable only to the case examples that fit into the mentioned everyday contexts of the
Anecdotes Applicable Only to the Case Examples Fit into the Mentioned Contexts of Ramayana.
Discussion
The present study focuses on developing and validating a comprehensive counseling module grounded in the
Several studies have shed light on the challenges of standardized psychotherapy in cultural contexts,18,34-37 highlighting the differences between Indian philosophical constructs and traditional psychotherapy based on sociocultural factors. The cultural context in India, including factors such as a client’s dependency on the therapist, faith and religion, beliefs in rebirth and fatalism, social hierarchy, confidentiality, decision-making, and personal responsibility, significantly influences the implementation of Western psychotherapy principles. According to experts, an individual’s personality emerges as a significant determinant in the trajectory of mental health disorders and therapeutic outcomes. Consequently, it is critical to adapt psychological interventions in alignment with the unique social and cultural factors inherent to a given society and culture.9,25,38,39
In the context of our research, we developed a
Furthermore, the study’s strength lies in using a systematic methodology comprising five iterative analyses, as detailed in the methodology section. This rigorous process led to identifying 107 relevant anecdotes, with active collaboration between the researcher, primary guide, and co-guide. Several other studies have also employed similar qualitative methods to incorporate religious elements into interventions, such as using focus groups, 43 conducting in-depth interviews, relying on existing literature, 44 conducting narrative reviews, 45 employing CBT frameworks, 46 and using various survey methods, 47 including the examination of published literature and conducting narrative reviews of sacred texts. Additionally, one study employed a series of approaches, including focused group discussions, in-depth stakeholder interviews, and active patient engagement, as central components in their intervention development strategies. 48 These approaches have collectively played a significant role in shaping interventions during the module development process in other studies. Importantly, our study also aligns with the qualitative methods employed for module development, reflecting a perspective that advocates for a bottom-up methodology to establish a comprehensive theoretical and practical foundation for treatment strategies, thereby promoting a holistic understanding.
The development of the
One significant aspect of this module’s development lies in its alignment with diagnostic criteria for CMDs as per the ICD-10. This alignment enhances the clinical applicability of the module by tailoring interventions to address the specific challenges posed by each CMD category. The module addresses core components such as emotion regulation, grief issues, and intra-personal or interpersonal relations. The aim is to target these challenges through
Across these diverse studies, the initial stages consistently emphasize rapport building and issue understanding, followed by phases involving problem formulation and therapeutic goal establishment. This uniformity underscores the structured progression prevalent in various intervention approaches.49-51 The delivery structure in
This study describes the development of a socioculturally relevant
Limitations
One limitation of this study is the lack of prior research or scientific data to establish a framework to guide the development of the module based on Indian scriptures. Consequently, we had to formulate our framework for developing and validating the module, relying solely on our expertise and inputs from several experts.
Conclusion
This study has outlined the comprehensive development and validation process of a
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Declaration Regarding the Use of Generative AI
None used.
Ethical Approval and Informed Consent
The Institute Ethics Committee (IEC) of the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences reviewed and approved the study. Written informed consent was obtained from expert mental health professionals.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
