Abstract
Background
Renewed interest in the Ross procedure in young adults has been tempered by questions over safety and early outcomes. This paper examines our institution's 1-year outcomes of the Ross procedure.
Methods
From November 2019 to February 2025, 136 consecutive adult patients underwent a Ross procedure at an urban tertiary center. The first 50 patients had follow-up beyond 1 year and constitute the study group of this case series.
Results
Median age was 41 years (IQR: 30, 47). The majority were male (n = 34, 68%). The most common indication for surgery was aortic stenosis with or without aortic regurgitation (AR) (n = 34, 68%), followed by pure AR (n = 14, 28%), then aortic aneurysm with valve dysfunction (n = 2, 4%). Valve morphology was bicuspid in 22 (44%) patients, unicuspid in 21 (42%), and tricuspid in 5 (10%). Primary etiology was congenital in 42 (84%) patients, degenerative in 2 (4%), failed mechanical valve in 2 (4%), healed endocarditis in 1 (2%), rheumatic disease in 1 (2%), radiation-induced in 1 (2%), and unknown in 1 (2%). Redo sternotomy was performed in 2 (4%) patients, ascending aorta replacement in 43 (86%), hemiarch replacement in 22 (44%), and external aortic annuloplasty ring in 23 (46%). In-hospital and 30-day mortality was 0%, with 2 (4%) permanent strokes post-operatively but with no or minimal residual deficits. There was 1 mortality at 1.1 years, 1 autograft re-intervention at 1.8 years, 1 autograft re-intervention at 4.1 years, and 1 homograft re-intervention at 2.7 years.
Conclusion
This paper demonstrates early safety of the Ross procedure for adults. More longitudinal data is needed to determine long-term efficacy and durability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
