The saphenous vein graft (SVG) remains widely used in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The no-touch (NT) technique offers atraumatic procedures in vein harvesting. Its effectiveness is still compared to conventional (CON) methods.
Method
We conducted a systematic review using electronic databases, focusing on studies that compared the NT and CON techniques in CABG. The primary outcomes assessed were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), graft patency, and leg complications. Kaplan–Meier estimates and the Cox proportional hazards model were used to analyze MACCE-free survival. This study has been registered on PROSPERO(CRD42024553619).
Results
A total of seven studies, including three randomized controlled trials and four prospective cohort studies, encompassing 3859 patients, were included in the analysis. The NT technique showed significantly higher overall graft patency (OR 1.59; 95% CI 1.18–2.15; p < 0.001; I2 = 49%), especially in the right coronary artery (OR 1.63; 95% CI 1.25–2.13; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%). However, the NT technique had a higher incidence of leg complications (OR 2.49; 95% CI 1.73–3.60; p < 0.001; I2 = 10%). No significant difference in 3-year MACCE-free survival (log-rank p = 0.47).
Conclusion
The NT SVG harvesting technique has the potential to improve patency rates, especially when utilized as a conduit to the right coronary artery territory.
ParangPAroraR. Coronary vein graft disease: pathogenesis and prevention. Can J Cardio2009; 25: e57–e62.
2.
BuxtonBFHaywardPARNewcombAE, et al.Choice of conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting: craft or science?Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2009; 35: 658–670.
3.
GharibehLFerrariGOuimetM, et al.Conduits’ biology regulates the outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting. JACC Basic Transl Sci2021; 6: 388–396.
4.
TatoulisJBuxtonBFFullerJA. Patencies of 2127 arterial to coronary conduits over 15 years. Ann Thorac Surg2004; 77: 93–101.
5.
CampeauLEnjalbertMLespéranceJ, et al.Atherosclerosis and late closure of aortocoronary saphenous vein grafts: sequential angiographic studies at 2 weeks, 1 year, 5 to 7 years, and 10 to 12 years after surgery. Circulation1983; 68: II1–II7.
6.
GalbutDLTraadEADormanMJ, et al.Seventeen-year experience with bilateral internal mammary artery grafts. Ann Thorac Surg1990; 49: 195–201.
7.
SamanoNGeijerHLidenM, et al.The no-touch saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass grafting maintains a patency, after 16 years, comparable to the left internal thoracic artery: a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2015; 150: 880–888.
8.
PapakonstantinouNBaikoussisNGoudevenosJ, et al.Novel no touch technique of saphenous vein harvesting: is great graft patency rate provided?Ann Card Anaesth2016; 19: 481–488.
9.
SouzaD. A new no-touch preparation technique. Technical notes. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg1996; 30: 41–44.
10.
PageMJMoherDBossuytPM, et al.PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J2021; 372: n160.
11.
DebSSinghSKDe SouzaD, et al.SUPERIOR SVG: no touch saphenous harvesting to improve patency following coronary bypass grafting (a multi-centre randomized control trial, NCT01047449). J Cardiothorac Surg2019; 14: 1–10.
12.
TianMWangXSunH, et al.No-Touch versus conventional vein harvesting techniques at 12 months after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: multicenter randomized, controlled trial. Circulation2021; 144: 1120–1129.
13.
FitzgibbonGMKafkaHPLeachAJ, et al.Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. J Am Coll Cardiol1996; 28: 616–626.
14.
GuyotPAdesAEOuwensMJNM, et al.Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published kaplan-meier survival curves. BMC Med Res Methodol2012; 12: 9.
15.
WellsGSheaB’ConnellO, et al.The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Non-Randomized Studies in Meta-Analysis. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 2014.
16.
TufanaruCMunnZAromatarisE, et al.JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Randomized Controlled Trials. Chapter 3: Systematic reviews of effectiveness. 2020.https://synthesismanual.jbi.global.
17.
HouXZhangKLiuT, et al.No-touch sequential saphenous venous harvesting technique in off-pump bypass surgery: a retrospective study. Front Cardiovasc Med2021; 8: 1–8.
18.
KimYHOhHCChoiJW, et al.No-touch saphenous vein harvesting may improve further the patency of saphenous vein composite grafts: early outcomes and 1-year angiographic results. Ann Thorac Surg2017; 103: 1489–1497.
19.
PengZZhaoRLiuZ, et al.The No-touch saphenous vein harvesting improves graft patency after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a propensity-matched analysis. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg2022; 37: 69–78.
20.
SouzaDSRDashwoodMRTsuiJCS, et al.Improved patency in vein grafts harvested with surrounding tissue: results of a randomized study using three harvesting techniques. Ann Thorac Surg2002; 73: 1189–1195.
21.
XenogiannisIZenatiMBhattDL, et al.Saphenous vein graft failure: from pathophysiology to prevention and treatment strategies. Circulation2021; 144: 728–745.
22.
KatranasSAKelekisALAntoniadisAP, et al.Differences in stress forces and geometry between left and right coronary artery: a pathophysiological aspect of atherosclerosis heterogeneity. Hellenic J Cardiol2015; 56: 217–223.
TekinIDemirMÖzdemS. Effect of different storage solutions on oxidative stress in human saphenous vein grafts. J Cardiothorac Surg2022; 17: 7.
25.
SolettiGJDell’AquilaMHarikL, et al.The VEST external support for saphenous vein grafts in coronary surgery: a review of randomized clinical trials. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis2023; 10: 453.
26.
DeppeA-CLiakopoulosOJChoiY-H, et al.Endoscopic vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review with meta-analysis of 27,789 patients. J Surg Res2013; 180: 114–124.
27.
ZMABDLBFG, et al.Randomized trial of endoscopic or open vein-graft harvesting for coronary-artery bypass. N Engl J Med2019; 380: 132–141.
28.
BannaaTEMohamedMMZayedA, et al.Saphenous vein harvesting with endoscopy versus no-touch technique: short-term results. J Med Sci Res2023; 6. doi:10.59299/2537-0928.1045
29.
KarthikSFabriBM. Left internal mammary artery usage in coronary artery bypass grafting: a measure of quality control. Ann R Coll Surg Engl2006; 88: 367–369.
30.
TaggartDP. The role of multiple arterial grafts in CABG: all roads lead to ROMA. J Am Coll Cardiol2019; 74: 2249–2253.
31.
GaudinoMAlexanderJHBakaeenFG, et al.Randomized comparison of the clinical outcome of single versus multiple arterial grafts: the ROMA trial-rationale and study protocol. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2017; 52: 1031–1040.
