Ross procedure has been a controversial option for treating aortic valve disease in adults since its introduction in 1967. By the early 2000s, it had become a procedure performed in only a small number of centres worldwide, with most cardiac surgeons lacking any firsthand experience during their training. Nevertheless, several centres of excellence continued to pursue mastery of this procedure during this period, and contemporary literature has ignited a renewed interest in the Ross procedure. In this review, we discuss the current landscape of the Ross procedure in aortic surgery.
RossDN. Replacement of aortic and mitral valves with a pulmonary autograft. Lancet1967; 2: 956–958.
2.
KlieverikLMTakkenbergJJBekkersJA, et al.The Ross operation: a Trojan horse?Eur Heart J2007; 28: 1993–2000.
3.
ReeceTBWelkeKFO’BrienS, et al.Rethinking the ross procedure in adults. Ann Thorac Surg2014; 97: 175–181.
4.
IsaacsAJShuhaiberJSalemiA, et al.National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2015; 149: 1262–9.e3.
5.
BasmanCPirelliLSinghVP, et al.Lifetime management for aortic stenosis: planning for future therapies. J Cardiol2022; 80: 185–189.
6.
MazineADavidTEStoklosaK, et al.Improved outcomes following Ross procedure compared with bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol2022; 79: 993–1005.
7.
El-HamamsyIToyodaNItagakiS, et al.Propensity-matched comparison of the Ross procedure and prosthetic aortic valve replacement in adults. J Am Coll Cardiol2022; 79: 805–815.
8.
YokoyamaYKunoTToyodaN, et al.Ross procedure versus mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: a network meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc2023; 12: e8066.
9.
KvidalPBergstromRHorteLG,et al.Observed and relative survival after aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol2000; 35: 747–756.
10.
MihaljevicTNowickiERRajeswaranJ, et al.Survival after valve replacement for aortic stenosis: implications for decision making. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2008; 135: 1270–1278.
11.
BouhoutIStevensLMMazineA, et al.Long-term outcomes after elective isolated mechanical aortic valve replacement in young adults. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2014; 148: 1341–1346.
12.
BourguignonTLhommetPEl KhouryR, et al.Very long-term outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards perimount aortic valve in patients aged 50-65 years. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2016; 49: 1462–1468.
13.
El-HamamsyIEryigitZStevensLM, et al.Long-term outcomes after autograft versus homograft aortic root replacement in adults with aortic valve disease: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet2010; 376: 524–531.
14.
DavidTEWooAArmstrongS,et al.When is the Ross operation a good option to treat aortic valve disease?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2010; 139: 68–73.
15.
CaldaroniFSkillingtonPO’KeefeM, et al.Twenty-five years of the Ross operation in adults: The inclusion technique keeps up the expectations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025: S0022-5223(25)00029-7. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.01.007
16.
SieversHHStierleUCharitosEI, et al.A multicentre evaluation of the autograft procedure for young patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: update on the German Ross registry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2016; 49: 212–218.
17.
SharabianiMTDorobantuDMMahaniAS, et al.Aortic valve replacement and the Ross operation in children and young adults. J Am Coll Cardiol2016; 67: 2585–2570.
18.
MartinEMohammadiSJacquesF, et al.Clinical outcomes following the Ross procedure in adults: a 25-year longitudinal study. J Am Coll Cardiol2017; 70: 1890–1899.
19.
Van HoofLRooyackersBSchuermansA, et al.Long-term outcome after the Ross procedure in 173 adults with up to 25 years of follow-up. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024; 66: ezae267.
20.
MastrobuoniSde KerchoveLSolariS, et al.The Ross procedure in young adults: over 20 years of experience in our institution. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2016; 49: 507–512.
21.
CarrelTSchwerzmannMEcksteinF, et al.Preliminary results following reinforcement of the pulmonary autograft to prevent dilatation after the Ross procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2008; 136: 472–475.
22.
AustinCRedondoA. Our 7-year experience supporting the Ross autograft with the novel technique of personalized external aortic root support. JTCVS Tech2024; 24: 121–127.
23.
MazineAGhoneimAEl-HamamsyI. The Ross procedure: how I teach it. Ann Thorac Surg2018; 105: 1294–1298.
24.
OttoCMNishimuraRABonowRO, et al.2020ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2021; 143: e72–227.
25.
VahanianABeyersdorfFPrazF, et al.; ESC/EACTS Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2022; 43: 561–632.
26.
MazineAEl-HamamsyIVermaS, et al.Ross procedure in adults for cardiologists and cardiac surgeons. JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol2018; 72: 2761–2777.
27.
MazineAFanCSChikweJ, et al. (2024). The Ross Resurgence: North American Trends in Utilization and In-Hospital Outcomes [Conference presentation abstract]. 104th annual meeting of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Toronto, ON, Canada. https://www.aats.org/resources/the-ross-resurgence-north-amer-7023#abstract
