Timeliness of lung cancer diagnosis and treatment: a single-center experience

Abstract

Background

Lung cancer is the number one cause of cancer death in America. Timely and appropriate care is critical in the management of lung cancer. We retrospectively reviewed our experience at the University of Kentucky to determine whether there were delays from initial presentation to diagnosis and from diagnosis to treatment. Furthermore, if delays existed, whether they affected overall survival and what factors contributed to these holdups in patient care.

Methods

This was a retrospective review of all patients who were diagnosed with lung cancer at the University of Kentucky between 2014 and 2017, including only those newly diagnosed at our institution and excluding patients who were diagnosed at other hospitals as well as patients with cancer recurrence. Out of a cohort of 3588 patients, only 517 were included.

Results

The average time between presentation and diagnosis was 43 days, and 86.7% of patients were diagnosed within 60 days. The average time to treatment from diagnosis was 27.5 days with 77.7% of patients being treated with either surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiation within 42 days.

Conclusion

The majority of our patients were diagnosed and treated within the recommended time. The 13.3% and 22.3% of patients who did not fall within this timeframe were delayed due to personal reasons, comorbidities, and/or “watchful waiting”. Mortality seemed to be unaffected by any delays in diagnosis or treatment. This analysis is the first step in understanding the challenges in patient care, and can be a tool to institute programs to help patients obtain necessary care.