Abstract
This article is presented as a reaction to the Nelson, Roberts, Mathur, and Rutherford (1999) article as well as the other five follow-up articles appearing in this Forum series. The purpose of the presentation is to expand the focus of the series by widening the discussion of “policy” as originally raised in the article by Nelson and colleagues. Two critical concerns were raised in the series: concerns about the research base for functional assessment and concerns about the practicality of implementing functional assessment. Each of these concerns is addressed within the context of speculation about the possible functions that may have been served by mandating the use of functional assessment within the 1997 amendments to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). It is suggested that the nature of public policy may, at times, deserve as much of our attention as research findings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
