The results of follow-up studies conducted on individuals with behavioral disorders (BD) from two high school graduating classes are compared. One class (class of 1985) was graduated well after passage of Public Law 94–142, but before passage of IDEA (when transition planning became a federal requirement); the other class (class of 1993) was graduated after passage of IDEA. Two questions were addressed: (1) Were graduates with BD from the class of 1993 better off than their counterparts from the class of 1985 as young adults out of school 1 year? and (2) Should we be satisfied with the status of these individuals as young adults? The class of 1993 demonstrated better outcomes than the class of 1985 in several areas, but graduates with BD did not experience outcomes equal to those of their classmates without disabilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlackorbyJ., & WagnerM. (1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study.Exceptional Children, 62, 399–413.
2.
Bureau of Special Education, (n.d.-a). Effects of the systems change process on the implementation of transition services.Des Moines: Iowa Department of Education.
3.
Bureau of Special Education, (n.d.-b). Iowa transition systems change: What does it look like?Des Moines: Iowa Department of Education.
4.
CarsonR., SitlingtonP., & FrankA. (1995). Young adulthood for individuals with behavioral disorders: What does it hold?Behavioral Disorders, 20, 127–135.
5.
DefurS., GetzelE., & KregelJ. (1994). Individual transition plans: A work in progress.Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 4, 139–145.
6.
EdgarE. (1988). Employment as an outcome for mildly handicapped students: Current status and future directions.Focus on Exceptional Children, 21, 1–8.
7.
EdgarE., & LevineP. (1987). A longitudinal follow-along study of graduates of special education.Seattle: University of Washington, Experimental Education Unit, Child Development and Mental Retardation Center.
8.
FrankA., SitlingtonP., & CarsonR. (1991). Transition of adolescents with behavioral disorders—Is it successful?Behavioral Disorders, 16, 180–191.
9.
FrankA., SitlingtonP., & CarsonR. (1995). Young adults with behavioral disorders: A comparison with peers with mild disabilities.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 3, 156–164.
10.
GrigalM., TestD., BeattieJ., & WoodW. (1997). An evaluation of transition components of individualized education programs.Exceptional Children, 63, 357–372.
11.
HasaziS., GordonL., & RoeC. (1985). Factors associated with the employment status of handicapped youth exiting high school for 1979 to 1983.Exceptional Children, 51, 455–469.
12.
Iowa Department of Education. (1987). Iowa Guidance Surveys: The dropout—Fiscal year 1986. The graduate—One year after fiscal year 1985.Des Moines: Author.
13.
Iowa Department of Education. (1993). Iowa Guidance Surveys: The dropout—Fiscal year 1992. The graduate—One year after fiscal year 1991.Des Moines: Author.
14.
LawsonS., & EversonJ. (1993). A national review of statements of transition services for students who are deaf-blind.New Orleans: Helen Keller National Technical Assistance Center.
15.
MithaugD., HoriuchiC., & FanningP. (1985). A report on the Colorado Statewide Follow-up Survey of Special Education Students.Exceptional Children, 51, 397–404.
16.
NeelR., MeadowsN., LevineP., & EdgarE. (1988). What happens after special education: A statewide follow-up study of secondary students who have behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 13, 209–216.
17.
ReissA., DuncanO., HattP., & NorthC. (1961). Occupations and social status.New York: Free Press.
18.
The School-to-Work Opportunities Act of 1994. 20 U.S.C. §69.
19.
SPSS-X 6.1 Base System User's Guide (Macintosh Version). (1994). Chicago: SPSS.
20.
TumaJ., & BurnsS. (1996). Trends in participation in secondary vocational education: 1982–1992.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
21.
U. S. Department of Education. (1994). National Assessment of Vocational Education final report to Congress.Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
22.
WagnerM., & BlackorbyJ. (1996). Transition from high school to work or college: How special education students fare.Special Education for Students with Disabilities, 6, 103–120.
23.
WagnerM., BlackorbyJ., CametoR., & NewmanL. (1993). What makes a difference? Influences on postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities. The third comprehensive report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students.Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
24.
WagnerM., D'AmicoR., MarderC., NewmanL., & BlackorbyJ. (1992). What happens next? Trends in postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities. The second comprehensive report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students.Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
25.
WagnerM., NewmanL., D'AmicoR., JayE., Butler-NalinP., MarderC., & CoxR. (1991). Youth with disabilities: How are they doing? The first comprehensive report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students.Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
26.
WillM. (1984). OSERS programming for the transition of youth with disabilities: Bridges from school to working life.Washington, DC: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
