The purpose of the current study was to examine the status of experimental research on interventions designed to modify behaviors of children and youth with emotional and/or behavioral disorders (EBD). Twelve journals published between 1980 and 1993 were surveyed to explore possible trends in five descriptive dimensions of the research, including subject characteristics, settings, research design, dependent variables, and independent variables (interventions). In addition, the database was examined to determine whether interventions were based on individualized processes of assessment. The results showed negligible trends, and very few studies reported interventions that were individualized on the basis of assessment data. The discussion addresses the general status of intervention research and the need for applied research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlakesleeT., SugaiG., & GrubaJ. (1994). A review of functional assessment use in data-based intervention studies.Journal of Behavioral Education, 4, 397–413.
2.
CarrE.G., & RobinsonS., & PalumboL. W. (1990). The wrong issue: Aversive versus nonaversive treatment. The right issue: Functional versus nonfunctional treatment. In ReppA.C., & SinghN.N. (Eds.), Perspectives on the use of nonaversive and aversive interventions for persons with developmental disabilities (pp. 362–379). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Press.
3.
ClarkeS., DunlapG., Foster-JohnsonL., ChildsK.E., WilsonD., WhiteR., & VeraA. (1995). Improving the conduct of students with behavioral disorders by incorporating student interests into curricular activities.Behavioral Disorders, 20, 221–237.
4.
DuchnowskiA.J., & FriedmanR.M. (1990). Children's mental health: Challenges for the nineties.Journal of Mental Health Administration, 17, 3–12.
5.
DunlapG., & KernL. (1993). Assessment and intervention for children within the instructional curriculum. In ReichleJ., & WackerD. (Eds.), Communicative approaches to the management of challenging behavior problems (pp. 177–203). Baltimore: Brookes.
6.
DunlapG., KernL., dePerczelM., ClarkeS., WilsonD., ChildsK.E., WhiteR., & FalkG. D. (1993). Functional analysis of classroom variables for students with emotional and behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 10, 275–291.
7.
GrosenickJ.K., GeorgeN.L., GeorgeM.P., & LewisT.J. (1991). Public school services for behaviorally disordered students: Program practices in the 1980's.Behavioral Disorders, 16, 87–96.
8.
GunterP., JackS., ShoresR., CarrellD., & FlowersJ. (1993). Lag sequential analysis as a tool for functional analysis of student disruptive behavior in classrooms.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 1, 138–148.
9.
HornerR.H., DunlapG., KoegelR.L., CarrE.G., SailorW., AndersonJ., AlbinR.W., & O'NeillR.E. (1990). Toward a technology of “nonaversive” behavioral support.Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15, 125–132.
10.
IwataB.A., VollmerT.R., & ZarconeJ.R. (1990). The experimental (functional) analysis of behavior disorders: Methodology, applications, and limitations. In ReppA.C., & SinghN.N. (Eds.), Perspectives on the use of nonaversive and aversive interventions for persons with developmental disabilities (pp. 301–330). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Press.
11.
KernL., ChildsK.E., DunlapG., ClarkeS., & FalkG.D. (1994). Using assessment-based curricular intervention to improve the classroom behavior of a student with emotional and behavioral challenges.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 7–19.
12.
KernL., & DunlapG. (in press). Assessment-based interventions for children with emotional and behavioral disorders. In ReppA.C., & HornerR.H. (Eds.), Functional analysis of problem behavior: From effective assessment to effective support.Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
13.
KnitzerJ. (1993). Children's mental health policy: Challenging the future.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 1, 8–16.
14.
KnitzerJ., SteinbergZ., & FleischB. (1990). At the schoolhouse door. An examination of programs and policies for children with behavioral and emotional problems.New York: Bank Street College of Education.
15.
KoyanagiC., & GainesS. (1993). All systems failure: An examination of the results of neglecting the needs of children with serious emotional disturbance.Alexandria, VA: National Mental Health Association.
16.
KutashK., DuchnowskiA.J., & SondheimerD.L. (1994). Building the research base for children's mental health services.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 2, 194–197.
17.
MaloufD.B., & SchillerE.P. (1995). Practice and research in special education.Exceptional Children, 61, 414–424.
18.
MeyerL.H., PeckC.A., & BrownL. (1991). Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities.Baltimore: Brookes.
19.
O'NeillR.E., HornerR.H., AlbinR.W., StoreyK., & SpragueJ.R. (1990). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A practical assessment guide.Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Press.
20.
Peacock Hill Working Group. (1991). Problems and promises in special education and related services for children and youth with emotional or behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 16, 299–313.
21.
ReppA.C., & HornerR.H. (Eds.), (in press). Functional analysis of problem behavior: From effective assessment to effective support.Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
22.
SinghN.N., DeitzD.E.D., EpsteinM.H., & SinghJ. (1991). Social behavior of students who are seriously emotionally disturbed: A quantitative analysis of intervention studies.Behavior Modification, 15, 74–94.
23.
SkibaR., & CaseyA. (1985). Interventions for behaviorally disordered students: A qualitative review and methodological critique.Behavioral Disorders, 10, 239–252.
24.
UmbreitJ. (1995). Functional assessment and intervention in a regular classroom setting for the disruptive behavior of a student with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.Behavioral Disorders, 20, 267–278.
