More students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) than ever before spend most of their time in general education. To increase their academic and behavioral success, students with EBD need access to empirically supported interventions and services. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate strategy effectiveness for students with EBD in K–12 inclusive settings. Identified studies were assessed with two approaches for evaluating methodological quality and multiple methods for assessing intervention effects. Results indicated that there is a dearth of empirical support for strategies implemented in general education classrooms for students with EBD though most of the studied reviewed were of high quality with moderate-to-large effects. In addition to the practical findings, the research team compared review methods with findings indicating agreement between expert visual analysis and more structured approaches for visual analysis. For the quantitative metrics, results indicated variable agreement across methods. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
AgranM.CavinM.WehmeyerM.PalmerS. (2006). Participation of students with moderate to severe disabilities in the general curriculum: The effects of the self-determined learning model of instruction. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31(3), 230–241. http://doi.org/10.1177/154079690603100303
2.
AlldayR. A.Hinkson-LeeK.HudsonT.Neilsen-GattiS.KleinkeA.RusselC. S. (2012). Training general educators to increase behavior-specific praise: Effects on students with EBD. Behavioral Disorders, 37, 87–98. http://doi.org/10.1177/019874291203700203
3.
Barnard-BrakL.WatkinsL.RichmanD. (2021). Optimal number of baseline sessions before changing phases within single-case experimental designs. Behavioural Processes, 191, 104461. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2021.104461
4.
BellK.YoungK. R.BlairM.NelsonR. (1990). Facilitating mainstreaming of students with behavioral disorders using classwide peer tutoring. School Psychology Review, 19(4), 564–573. http://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1990.12087358
5.
BennerG. J.NelsonJ. R.RalstonN. C.MooneyP. (2010). A meta-analysis of the effects of reading instruction on the reading skills of students with or at risk of behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 35(2), 86–102. http://doi.org/10.1177/019874291003500202
6.
BlanchettW. J.MumfordV.BeachumF. (2005). Urban school failure and disproportionality in a post-Brown era benign neglect of the constitutional rights of students of color. Remedial and Special Education, 26(2), 70–81. http://doi.org/10.1177/07419325050260020201
7.
Bowman-PerrottL.BurkeM. D.ZainiS.ZhangN.VannestK. (2016). Promoting positive behavior using the Good Behavior Game: A meta-analysis of single-case research. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18(3), 180–190. http://doi.org/10.1177/1098300715592355
8.
BrossartD. F.VannestK. J.DavisJ. L.PatienceM. A. (2014). Incorporating nonoverlap indices with visual analysis for quantifying intervention effectiveness in single-case experimental designs. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24(3–4), 464–491. http://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2013.868361
9.
BrunstingN. C.BettiniE.RockM.CommonE. A.RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.. . . ZengF. (2023). Working conditions and burnout of special educators of students with EBD: Longitudinal outcomes. Teacher Education and Special Education, 46(1), 44–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064221076159
10.
BurkeK. M.ShogrenK. A.AntoshA. A.RaleyS. K.LaPlanteT.WehmeyerM. L. (2019). Implementing evidence-based practices to promote self-determination: Lessons learned from a state-wide implementation of the self-determined learning model of instruction. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 54(1), 18–29. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1205709.pdf
11.
CampbellA. R.Bowman-PerrottL.BurkeM. D.SalleseM. R. (2018). Reading, writing, math, and content-area interventions for improving behavioral and academic outcomes of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 16(2), 119–138. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1194543.pdf
12.
ChenM.Hyppa-MartinJ. K.ReichleJ. E.SymonsF. J. (2016). Comparing single case design overlap-based effect size metrics from studies examining speech generating device interventions. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 121(3), 169–193. http://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-121.3.169
13.
ChoiJ. H.McCartA. B.SailorW. (2020). Reshaping educational systems to realize the promise of inclusive education. FIRE: Forum for International Research in Education, 6(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.32865/fire202061179
14.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
CookB. G.BuysseV.KlingnerJ.LandrumT. J.McWilliamR. A.TankersleyM.TestD. W. (2015). CEC’s standards for classifying the evidence base of practices in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 36(4), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514557271
16.
CookB. G.TherrienW. J. (2017). Null effects and publication bias in special education research. Behavioral Disorders, 42(4), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742917709473
DockrellJ. E.ShieldB. (2012). The impact of sound-field systems on learning and attention in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(4), 1163–1176. http://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0026)
20.
DowdyA.JesselJ.SainiV.PeltierC. (2021, September16). Structured visual analysis of single case experimental design data: Developments and technological advancements. http://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ke2fh
21.
FalligantJ. M.McNultyM. K.HausmanN. L.RookerG. W. (2020). Using dual-criteria methods to supplement visual inspection: Replication and extension. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53(3), 1789–1798. http://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.665
22.
FerronJ. M.JooS. H.LevinJ. R. (2017). A Monte Carlo evaluation of masked visual analysis in response-guided versus fixed-criteria multiple-baseline designs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50(4), 701–716. http://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.410
23.
FisherW. W.KelleyM. E.LomasJ. E. (2003). Visual aids and structured criteria for improving visual inspection and interpretation of single-case designs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36(3), 387–406. http://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2003.36-387
24.
GarwoodJ. D.BrunstingN. C.FoxL. C. (2014). Improving reading comprehension and fluency outcomes for adolescents with emotional-behavioral disorders: Recent research synthesized. Remedial and Special Education, 35(3), 181–194. http://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513514856
25.
GarwoodJ. D.PeltierC.SinclairT.EiselH.McKennaJ. W.VannestK. J. (2021). A quantitative synthesis of intervention research published in flagship EBD journals: 2010 to 2019. Behavioral Disorders, 47(1), 14–27. http://doi.org/10.1177/0198742920961341
26.
GayG. (2002). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
27.
GilmourA. F.SandilosL. E.PilnyW. V.SchwartzS.WehbyJ. H. (2022). Teaching students with emotional/behavioral disorders: Teachers’ burnout profiles and classroom management. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 30(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266211020258
28.
GuessD.BensonH. A.Siegel-CauseyE. (1985). Concepts and issues related to choose-making and autonomy among persons with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10(2), 79–86. http://doi.org/10.1177/154079698501000202
29.
HarrisonJ. R.BunfordN.EvansS. W.OwensJ. S. (2013). Educational accommodations for students with behavioral challenges: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 83(4), 551–597. http://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313497517
30.
HarrisonJ. R.SoaresD. A.JoyceJ. (2018). A systematic scoping review of inclusion in general education settings: Youth with emotional and behavioral challenges. International Journal on Inclusive Education, 23(12), 1209–1231. http://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1444107
31.
HarrisonJ. R.SoaresD. A.RudzinskiS.JohnsonR. (2019). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorders and classroom-based interventions: Evidence-based status, effectiveness, and moderators of effects in single-case design research. Review of Educational Research, 89(4), 569–611. http://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319857038
32.
HartmannD. P.BarriosB. A.WoodD. D. (2004). Principles of behavioral observation. In HaynesS. N.HeibyE. M. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment, Vol. 3. Behavioral assessment (pp. 108–127). John Wiley & Sons.
33.
HodgeJ.RiccominiP. J.BufordR.HerbstM. H. (2006). A review of instructional interventions in mathematics for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 31(3), 297–311. http://doi.org/10.1177/019874290603100304
34.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–179. http://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100203
35.
JalaliS.WohlinC. (2012). Systematic literature studies: Database searches vs. backward snowballing. In Proceedings of the ACM-IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering and measurement (pp. 29–38). Association for Computing Machinery. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6475394
36.
JolivetteK.Parks EnnisR.SwoszowskiN. C. (2017). Educator “what-ifs”: The feasibility of choice making in the classroom. Beyond Behavior, 26(2), 74–80. http://doi.org/10.1177/1074295617713977
37.
KauffmanJ. M.AhrbeckB.AnastasiouD.BadarJ.CrockettJ. B.FelderM.. . .SmithC. R. (2022). Parents’ and educators’ perspectives on inclusion of students with disabilities. In BoyleC.AllenK. (Eds.), Research for inclusive quality education: Leveraging belonging, inclusion, and equity (pp. 205–217). Springer.
38.
KazdinA. E. (1977). Assessing the clinical or applied importance of behavior change through social validation. Behavior Modification, 1(4), 427–452. http://doi.org/10.1177/014544557714001
39.
KazdinA. E. (1999). The meanings and measurement of clinical significance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(3), 332–339. http://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.67.3.332
40.
KazdinA. E. (2019). Single-case experimental designs. Evaluating interventions in research and clinical practice. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 117, 3–17.
41.
KellyJ. R.ShogrenK. A. (2014). The impact of teaching self-determination skills on the on-task and off-task behaviors of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 22(1), 27–40. http://doi.org/10.1177/1063426612470515
42.
KnowlesC.MengP.MachalicekW. (2015). Task sequencing for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: A systematic review. Behavior Modification, 39(1), 136–166. http://doi.org/10.1177/0145445514559927
43.
LiberatiA.AltmanD. G.TetzlaffJ.MulrowC.GøtzscheP. C.IoannidisJ. P.. . . MoherD. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), e1–e34. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006
44.
LosinskiM.Cuenca-CarlinoY.ZablockiM.TeagardenJ. (2014). Examining the efficacy of self-regulated strategy development for students with emotional or behavioral disorders: A meta-analysis. Behavioral Disorders, 40(1), 52–67. http://doi.org/10.17988/0198-7429-40.1.52
45.
MaagJ. W.AndersonJ. M. (2006). Effects of sound-field amplification to increase compliance of students with emotional and behavior disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 31(4), 378–393. http://doi.org/10.1177/019874290603100404
46.
MagginD. M.CookB. G.CookL. (2019). Making sense of single-case design effect sizes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 34(3), 124–132. http://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12204
47.
ManolovR.MoeyaertM.FingerhutJ. E. (2022). A priori justification for effect measures in single-case experimental designs. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 45, 153–186. http://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-021-00282-2
48.
MasonL. H.KubinaR. M.Jr.HooverT. (2013). Effects of quick writing instruction for high school students with emotional disturbances. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 21(3), 163–175. http://doi.org/10.1177/1063426611410429
49.
McGuireS. N.MeadanH. (2022). General educators’ perceptions of social inclusion of elementary students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 48(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/01987429221079047
50.
McKennaJ. W.GarwoodJ.ParentiM. (2021). Inclusive instruction for students with emotional/behavioral disorders: Service in the absence of intervention research. Intervention in School and Clinic, 56(5), 316–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451220963084
51.
McKennaJ. W.SolisM.BrighamF.AdamsonR. (2019). The responsible inclusion of students receiving special education services for emotional disturbance: Unraveling the practice to research gap. Behavior Modification, 43(4), 587–611. http://doi.org/10.1177/0145445518762398
52.
MitchellB. S.KernL.ConroyM. A. (2019). Supporting students with emotional or behavioral disorders: State of the field. Behavioral Disorders, 44(2), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742918816518
53.
MithaugD. E.MartinJ. E.AgranM. (1987). Adaptability instruction: The goal of transition programming. Exceptional Children, 53, 500–505. http://doi.org/10.1177/001440298705300603
54.
MithaugD. E.WehmeyerM. L.AgranM.MartinJ.PalmerS. (1998). The self-determined learning model of instruction: Engaging students to solve their learning problems. In WehmeyerM. L.SandsD. J. (Eds.), Making it happen: Student involvement in educational planning, decision-making and instruction (pp. 299–328). Paul H. Brookes.
55.
MulcahyC. A.KrezmienM. P.TraversJ. (2016). Improving mathematics performance among secondary students with EBD: A methodological review. Remedial and Special Education, 37(2), 113–128. http://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515579275
56.
NguyenT. D.KremerK. P. (2022). Burned out and dissatisfied? The relationships between teacher dissatisfaction and burnout and their attrition behavior. The Elementary School Journal, 123(2), 203–227. https://doi.org/10.1086/721772
57.
NinciJ.VannestK. J.WillsonV.ZhangN. (2015). Interrater agreement between visual analysts of single-case data: A meta-analysis. Behavior Modification, 39(4), 510–541. http://doi.org/10.1177/0145445515581327
58.
OusleyC. L.RaulstonT. J.GregoriE. V.McNaughtonD.BhanaN.MantzorosT. (2020). A comparison of single-case evaluation tools applied to functional communication training with augmentative and alternative communication supports for students with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 107, 103803. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103803
59.
PalmerC. V. (1998). Quantification of the ecobehavioral impact of a soundfield loudspeaker system in elementary classrooms. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41(4), 819–833. http://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4104.819
60.
PierceC. D.ReidR.EpsteinM. H. (2004). Teacher-mediated interventions for children with EBD and their academic outcomes: A review. Remedial and Special Education, 25(3), 175–188. http://doi.org/10.1177/07419325040250030501
61.
PraterM. A. (1992). Increasing time-on-task in the classroom. Intervention in School and Clinic, 28(1), 22–27. http://doi.org/10.1177/105345129202800104
62.
PustejovskyJ. E.FerronJ. M. (2017). Research synthesis and meta-analysis of single-case designs. In KaufmannJ. M.HallahanD. P.PullenP. C. (Eds.), Handbook of Special Education (2nd ed.). Routledge.
63.
PustejovskyJ. E.HedgesL. V.ShadishW. R. (2014). Design-comparable effect sizes in multiple baseline designs: A general modeling framework. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 39(5), 368–393. http://doi.org/10.3102/1076998614547577
RaffertyL. A. (2012). Self-monitoring during whole group reading instruction: Effects among students with emotional and behavioral disabilities during summer school intervention sessions. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 17(2), 157–173. http://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2012.672866
66.
Robinson-ErvinP.CartledgeG.Musti-RaoS.GibsonJrLKeyesS. E. (2016). Social skills instruction for urban learners with emotional and behavioral disorders: A culturally responsive and computer-based intervention. Behavioral Disorders, 41(4), 209–225. http://doi.org/10.17988/bedi-41-04-209-225.1
67.
RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.DunlapK. D.EnnisR. P. (2019). A systematic review of teacher-deliver praise on K-12 student performance. Remedial and Special Education, 40(2), 112–128. http://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517751054
68.
RyanJ. B.ReidR.EpsteinM. H. (2004). Peer-mediated intervention studies on academic achievement for students with EBD: A review. Remedial and Special Education, 25(6), 330–341. http://doi.org/10.1177/07419325040250060101
69.
ShogrenK. A.PalmerS. B.WehmeyerM. L.Williams-DiehmK.LittleT. D. (2012). Effect of intervention with the self-determined learning model of instruction on access and goal attainment. Remedial and Special Education, 33(5), 320–330. http://doi.org/10.1177/0741932511410072
70.
SkerbetzM. D.KostewiczD. E. (2015). Consequence choice and students with emotional and behavioral disabilities: Effects on academic engagement. Exceptionality, 23(1), 14–33. http://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2014.986603
71.
SoaresD. A.HarrisonJ. R.VannestK. J.McClellandS. S. (2016). Effect size for token economy use in contemporary classroom settings: A meta-analysis and moderator analysis of single case research. School Psychology Review, 45(4), 379–399. http://doi.org/10.17105/SPR45-4.379-399
72.
SolomonB. G.HowardT. K.SteinB. L. (2015). Critical assumptions and distribution features pertaining to contemporary single-case effect sizes. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24, 438–458. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-015-9221-4
73.
StockardJ.WoodT. W. (2017). The threshold and inclusive approaches to determining “best available evidence” an empirical analysis. American Journal of Evaluation, 38(4), 471–492. http://doi.org/10.1177/1098214016662338
74.
StrainP.FoxL.BartonE. E. (2021). On expanding the definition and use of procedural fidelity. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 46(3), 173–183.
75.
SutherlandK. S.WehbyJ. H.CopelandS. R. (2000). Effect of varying rates of behavior-specific praise on the on-task behavior of students with EBD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8(1), 2–8. http://doi.org/10.1177/106342660000800101
76.
SutherlandK. S.WehbyJ. H.YoderP. J. (2002). Examination of the relationship between teacher praise and opportunities for students with EBD to respond to academic requests. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10(1), 5–13. http://doi.org/10.1177/106342660201000102
77.
SwobodaC. M.KratochwillT. R.LevinJ. R. (2010). Conservative dual-criterion method for single-case research: A guide for visual analysis of AB, ABAB, and multiple baseline designs (WCER Working Paper No. 2010-13). University of Wisconsin–Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research. http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/publications/workingPapers/papers.php
U.S. Department of Education. (2023). A history of the individuals with disabilities education act. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. https://sites.ed.gov/idea/IDEA-History#Sources
80.
VannestK. J.HarrisonJ. R.Temple-HarveyK.RamseyL.ParkerR. I. (2011). Improvement rate differences of academic interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 32(6), 521–534. http://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510362509
81.
VannestK. J.SalleseM. R. (2022). Benchmarking effect sizes in single-case experimental designs. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 43(1), 27–39. http://doi.org/10.1177/07419325211017298
82.
VannestK. J.Temple-HarveyK. K.MasonB. A. (2009). Adequate yearly progress for students with emotional and behavioral disorders through research-based practices. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 53(2), 73–84. http://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.53.2.73-84
83.
VoightM. L.HoogenboomB. J. (2012). Publishing your work in a journal: Understanding the peer review process. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 7(5), 452. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23091777/
84.
WehbyJ. H.LaneK. L.FalkK. B. (2005). An inclusive approach to improving early literacy skills of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 30(2), 155–169. http://doi.org/10.1177/019874290503000208
85.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.AgranM.MithaugD. E.MartinJ. E. (2000). Promoting causal agency: The self-determined learning model of instruction. Exceptional Children, 66(4), 439–454. http://doi.org/10.1177/001440290006600401
86.
WehmeyerM. L.ShogrenK. A.PalmerS. B.Williams-DiehmK. L.LittleT. D.BoultonA. (2012). The impact of the self-determined learning model of instruction on self-determination. Exceptional Children, 78(2), 135–153. http://doi.org/10.1177/001440291207800201
WolfeK.SeamanM. A.DrasgowE.SherlockP. (2018). An evaluation of the agreement between the conservative dual-criterion method and expert visual analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 51(2), 345–351. http://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.453
89.
WoodK.HarmonM. (2001). Strategies for integrating reading & writing in middle and high school classrooms. The International Reading Association.
90.
ZimmermanK. N.LedfordJ. R.SeveriniK. E.PustejovskyJ. E.BartonE. E.LloydB. P. (2018). Single-case synthesis tools I: Comparing tools to evaluate SCD quality and rigor. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 79, 19–32. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.02.001
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
