Multitiered frameworks like Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) have been recommended for preventing and remediating behavior problems. In this study, technology-based self-monitoring was used as a Tier 2 intervention to improve the academic engagement and disruptive behavior of three middle school students who were identified as at risk for failure and needing immediate intervention. Results of the multiple baseline design across settings indicated the intervention was highly effective for one student and moderately effective for another. The third student required more intense support than offered in Tier 2. Issues of matching students to Tier 2 intervention based on multiple data sources, the alignment of technology-based self-monitoring with key features of Tier 2, limitations of the study, recommendations for future research, and implications for practice are discussed.
AchenbachT. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4-18 and 1991 profile. Burlington: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont.
2.
AndersonC. M.BorgmeierC. (2010). Tier II interventions within the framework of school-wide positive behavior support: Essential features for design, implementation, and maintenance. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 3(1), 33–45.
3.
ArslanS. (2014). An investigation of the relationships between metacognition and self-regulation with structural equation. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 6, 603–611. doi: 10.15345/iojes.2014.03.009
4.
BrieschA. M.ChafouleasS. M. (2009). Review and analysis of literature on self-management interventions to promote appropriate classroom behaviors (1988–2008). School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 106–118. doi: 10.1037/a0016159
5.
BruhnA. L.GoinL.HasselbringT. S. (2014). SCORE IT (Unpublished tablet application).
6.
BruhnA. L.VogelgesangK.FernandoJ.LugoW. (2016). Using data to individualize a multi-component, technology-based self-monitoring intervention. Journal of Special Education Technology, 31, 64–76. doi:10.1177/0162643416650024
7.
BruhnA. L.VogelgesangK.SchabilionK.WallerL.FernandoJ. (2015). I don’t like being good! Changing behavior with technology-based self-monitoring. Journal of Special Education Technology, 30, 133–144. doi: 10.1177/0162643415618911
8.
BruhnA. L.WattS. (2012). Improving behavior by using multicomponent self-monitoring within a targeted reading intervention. Behavioral Disorders, 38, 3–17.
9.
ChafouleasS. M. (2011). Direct Behavior Rating: A review of the issues and research in its development. Education and Treatment of Children, 34, 575–591. doi:10.1353/etc.2011.0034
10.
CrutchfieldS. A.MasonR. A.ChambersA.WillsH. P.MasonB. A. (2015). Use of a self-monitoring application to reduce stereotypic behavior in adolescents with Autism: A preliminary investigation of I-Connect. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 1146–1155. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2272-x
11.
EavesR. C.Woods-GrovesS. (2011). The Human Behavior Rating Scale: Brief. Opelika, AL: Small World.
12.
EcclesJ. S.MidgleyC.WigfieldA.BuchananC. M.ReumanD.FlanaganC.Mac IverD. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage/environment fit. American Psychologist, 48, 90–101. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90
13.
GoodmanR. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x
14.
HarrisK. R.FriedlanderB. D.SaddlerB.FrizzelleR.GrahamS. (2005). Self-monitoring of attention versus self-monitoring of academic performance effects among students with ADHD in the general education classroom. The Journal of Special Education, 39, 145–157. doi: 10.1177/00224669050390030201
15.
HillC. R.HughesJ. N. (2007). An examination of the convergent and discriminant validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 380–406. doi: 10.1037/1045-3830.22.3.380
16.
HornerR. H.ToddA. W.Lewis-PalmerT.IrvinL. K.SugaiG.BolandJ. B. (2004). The School-Wide Evaluation Tool (SET): A research instrument for assessing school-wide positive behavior support. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 3–12. doi: 10.1177/10983007040060010201
17.
JosephL. M.EveleighE. L. (2011). A review of the effects of self-monitoring on reading performance of students with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 45, 43–53. doi:10.1177/022466909349145
18.
McDanielS. M.BruhnA. L.MitchellB. (2015). Tier 2: A framework for identification and intervention. Beyond Behavior, 24(1), 10–17.
19.
McDanielS. M.BruhnA. L.TroughtonL. (2016). A brief social skills intervention to reduce challenging classroom behavior. Journal of Behavioral Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10864-016-9259-y
20.
McIntoshK.CampbellA. L.CarterD. R.DickeyC. R. (2009). Differential effects of a tier two behavior intervention based on function of problem behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11, 82–93. doi:10.1177/1098300708319127
21.
MitchellB. S.BruhnA. L.LewisT. J. (2015). Essential features of tier 2 & 3 school-wide positive behavioral supports. In JimersonS. R.BurnsM. K.VanDerHeydenA. M. (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (2nd ed., pp. 539–562). New York, NY: Springer.
22.
ReinkeW. M.HermanK. C. (2002). Creating school environments that deter problem behaviors in youth. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 549–559. doi: 10.1002/pits.10048
RutterM. (1967). A children’s behavior questionnaire for completion by teachers: Preliminary findings. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 8, 1–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1967.tb02175.x
25.
SheffieldK.WallerR. J. (2010). A review of single-case studies utilizing self-monitoring interventions to reduce problem classroom behaviors. Beyond Behavior, 19(2), 7–13.
26.
StormontM.ReinkeW. M. (2013). Implementing Tier 2 social behavioral interventions: Current issues, challenges, and promising approaches. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 29, 121–125. doi: 10.1080/15377903.2013.778769
27.
VogelgesangK.BruhnA.Coghill-BehrendsW. L.KernM.TroughtonL. (2016). A single-subject study of a technology-based self-monitoring intervention. Journal of Behavioral Education, 25, 478–497. doi:10.1007/s10864-016-9253-4
28.
WangM.DishionT. J. (2012). The trajectories of adolescents’ perceptions of school climate, deviant peer affiliation, and behavioral problems during the middle school years. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22, 40–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00763.x
29.
WillsH. P.MasonB. A. (2014). Implementation of a self-monitoring application to improve on-task behavior: A high-school pilot study. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23, 421–434. doi: 10.1007/s10864-014-9204-x
30.
Woods-GrovesS. (2015). The Human Behavior Rating Scale-Brief: A tool to measure 21st century skills of K-12 learners. Psychological Reports, 116, 769–796. doi: 10.2466/03.11.PR0.116k29w0
