A single subject alternating treatment design across three student-teacher dyads was used to investigate the comparative impact on student academic engaged time of three opportunity-to-respond (OTR) strategies: guided notes, class-wide peer tutoring, and response cards. Participants were three high school students with disabilities with noted behavioral concerns and poor academic performance within mathematics general education courses. Results indicated all OTR interventions were effective in improving percentage of academic engaged time and reducing behavioral disruptions. Using visual analysis and an additional replication phase, response cards proved to the most efficacious in improving student outcomes. Implications for the existing knowledge base on the efficacy of OTR as well as future research within high school settings are discussed.
ArmendarizF.UmbreitJ. (1999). Using active responding to reduce disruptive behavior in a general education classroom. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1, 152–158.
2.
BellK.YoungK. R.BlairM.NelsonR. (1990). Facilitating mainstreaming of students with behavioral disorders using classwide peer tutoring. School Psychology Review, 19,564–574.
3.
BlackwellA. J.McLaughlinT. F. (2005). Using guided notes, choral responding, and response cards to increase student performance. The International Journal of Special Education, 20, 1–5.
4.
Bowman-PerrottL. (2009). Class-wide peer tutoring: An effective strategy for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44, 259–267.
5.
Center for Adolescent Research in Schools. (2012, August). Class-room procedures manual. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University.
6.
Council for Exceptional Children. (1987). Academy for effective instruction: Working with mildly handicapped students. Reston, VA: Author.
7.
CoutinhoM. J. (1986). Reading achievement of students identified as behaviorally disordered at the secondary level. Behavioral Disorders, 11, 200–207.
8.
GastD. L. (2010). Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
GreenwoodC. R.DelquadriJ. (1995). Classwide peer tutoring and the prevention of school failure. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 39, 21–25.
10.
GregoryA.SkibaR. J.NogueraP. A. (2010). The achievement gap and the discipline gap two sides of the same coin?Educational Researcher, 39, 59–68.
11.
HaydonT.BordersC.EmburyD.ClarkeL. (2009). Using effective instructional delivery as a classwide management tool. Beyond Behavior, 18, 12–17.
12.
HaydonT.ConroyM. A.ScottT. M.SindelarP. T.BarberB. R.OrlandoA. (2010). A comparison of three types of opportunities to respond on student academic and social behaviors. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 18, 27–40.
13.
HaydonT.MancilG. R.Van LoanC. (2009). Using opportunities to respond in a general education classroom: A case study. Education and Treatment of Children, 32, 267–278.
14.
HaylingC. C.CookC.GreshamF. M.StateT.KernL. (2008). An analysis of the status of stability of the behaviors of students with emotional and behavioral difficulties. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17, 24–42.
15.
HinshawS. P. (1992). Externalizing behavior problems and academic underachievement in childhood and adolescence: Causal relationships and underlying mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 127–155.
16.
HirnR.ScottT. M. (2012). Academic and behavior response to intervention project. Louisville, KY: University of Louisville.
17.
KernL.EvansS. W.LewisT. J.StateT. M.WeistM. D.WillsH. P. (2015). CARS comprehensive intervention for secondary students with emotional and behavioral problems: Conceptualization and development. Education and Treatment of Children, 23, 195–205.
18.
LaneK. L.CarterE. W.PiersonM. R.GlaeserB. C. (2006). Academic, social, and behavioral characteristics of high school students with emotional disturbances or learning disabilities. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 108–117.
19.
MastropieriM. A.ScruggsT. E.SpencerV.FontanaJ. (2003). Promoting success in high school world history: Peer tutoring versus guided notes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 52–65.
20.
MerrellK. W.WalkerH. M. (2004). Deconstructing a definition: Social maladjustment versus emotional disturbance and moving the EBD field forward. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 899–910.
RandolphJ. J. (2007). Meta-analysis of the research on response cards: Effects on test achievement, quiz achievement, participation, and off-task behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9, 113–128.
23.
ReimersT. M.WackerD. P. (1988). Parents’ ratings of the acceptability of behavioral treatment recommendations made in an outpatient clinic: A preliminary analysis of the influence of treatment effectiveness. Behavioral Disorders, 14, 7–15.
24.
ReschlyA. L.ChristensonS. L. (2006). Prediction of dropout among students with mild disabilities: A case for the inclusion of student engagement variables. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 276–292.
25.
RyanJ. B.ReidR.EpsteinM. H. (2004). A review of peer-mediated intervention studies on academic achievement for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 330–341.
26.
SimonsenB.FairbanksS.BrieschA.MyersD.SugaiG. (2008). Evidence-based practices in classroom management: Considerations for research to practice. Education and Treatment of Children, 31, 351–380.
27.
SimonsenB.MyersD.DeLucaC. (2010). Teaching teachers to use prompts, opportunities to respond, and specific praise. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33, 300–318.
28.
SimpsonR. L.PetersonR. L.SmithC. R. (2011). Critical educational program components for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: Science, policy, and practice. Remedial and Special Education, 32, 230–242.
29.
SkinnerC. H.FletcherP. A.HeningtonC. (1996). Increasing learning rates by increasing student responses rates: A summary of research. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 313–325.
30.
SkinnerC. H.PappasD. N.DavisK. A. (2005). Enhancing academic engagement: Providing opportunities for responding and influencing students to choose to respond. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 389–403.
31.
SpencerV. G.ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (2003). Content area learning in middle school social studies classrooms and students with emotional or behavioral disorders: A comparison of strategies. Behavioral Disorders, 28, 77–93.
32.
SprickR.BorgmeierC. (2010). Behavior prevention and management in three tiers in secondary schools. In ShinnM. R.WalkerH. M. (Eds.), Interventions for achievement and behavior problems in a three-tier model including RTI (pp. 435–468). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists Publications.
33.
StichterJ. P.LewisT. J.WhittakerT. A.RichterM.JohnsonN. W.TrussellR. P. (2009). Assessing teacher use of opportunities to respond and effective classroom management strategies: Comparisons among high- and low-risk elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11, 68–81.
34.
SutherlandK. S.WehbyJ. H. (2001). Exploring the relationship between increased opportunities to respond to academic requests and the academic and behavioral outcomes of students with EBD: A review. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 113–121.
35.
SutherlandK. S.WehbyJ. H.YoderP. J. (2002). Examination of the relationship between teacher praise and opportunities for students with EBD to respond to academic requests. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10, 5–13.
36.
TappJ.WehbyJ.EllisD. (1995). A multiple option observation system for experimental studies: MOOSES. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 27, 25–31.
37.
TroutA. L.NordnessP. D.PierceC. D.EpsteinM. H. (2003). Research on the academic status of children with emotional and behavioral disorders: A review of the literature from 1961 to 2000. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 198–210.
38.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. (2008). 30th annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/osep/2008/parts-b-c/30th-idea-arc.pdf
39.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. (2015). 37th annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www.edpubs.gov/document/ed005611p.pdf?ck=66
40.
WehbyJ. H.LaneK. L.FalkK. B. (2003). Academic instruction for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 194–197.
