Students new to a self-contained middle school for students with emotional disturbance (ED) were followed during their first year to assess the effectiveness of the program on school functioning and psychopathology. Measures for academic functioning (grade point average and subject failures), attendance (absenteeism and lateness), and disciplinary referrals (with and without out-of-school suspension) were obtained for the year prior to enrollment as well as at the completion of the first year in the program. Pre and post psychopathology were also rated for the students through the teacher version of the Adolescent Symptom Inventory (ASI-4T). Significant improvement with an average effect size of .61 was found for 5 of the 6 functional measures, as well as for the conduct disorder and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (inattentive type) categories of the ASIAT. Thus, first-year effectiveness was found for the ED program, although the levels of absenteeism, disciplinary referrals, and psychopathology remained of concern.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CarlbergC., & KavaleK. (1980). The efficacy of special versus regular class placement for exceptional children: A meta-analysis.Journal of Special Education, 14, 295–309.
2.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum.
3.
CookB. G., LandrumT. J., TankersleyM., & KauffmanJ. M. (2003). Bringing research to bear on practice: Effecting evidence-based instruction for students with emotional or behavioral disorders.Education and Treatment of Children, 26, 345–361.
4.
DuncanB. B., FornessS. R., & HartsoughC. (1995). Students identified as seriously emotionally disturbed in school-based treatment: Cognitive, psychiatric, and special education characteristics.Behavioral Disorders, 20, 238–252.
5.
FornessS. R. (2005). The pursuit of evidence-based practice in special education for children with emotional or behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 30, 311–330.
6.
FornessS. R., & KavaleK. A. (2001). Ignoring the odds: Hazards of not adding the new medical model to special education decisions.Behavioral Disorders, 26, 269–281.
GreenbaumP. E., DedrickR. E., FriedmanR. M., KutashK., BrownE. C., & LardieriS. P. (1996). National Adolescent and Child Treatment Study (NACTS): Outcomes for children with serious emotional and behavioral disturbance.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 140–146.
9.
HollingsheadA. B. (1975). Four factor index of social status.New Haven, CT: Yale University.
10.
KavakeK. A., & FornessS. R. (2000). Policy decisions in special education: The role of meta-analysis. In GerstenR., SchillerE. P., & VaughnS. (Eds.), Contemporary special education research: Syntheses of the knowledge base on critical instructional issues (pp. 281–326). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11.
LaneK. L., WehbyJ. H., LittleM. A., & CooleyV. (2005). Students educated in self-contained classes and self-contained schools: Part II—How do they progress over time?Behavioral Disorders, 30, 363–374.
12.
LittleR. J. A., & RubinD. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data.New York: John Wiley and Sons.
13.
LloydJ. W., FornessS. R., & KavaleK. A. (1998). Some methods are more effective than others.Intervention in School and Clinic, 33, 195–200.
14.
MarchJ. S., SilvaS. S., ComptonS., AnthonyG., DeVeaugh-GeissJ., & CaliffR. (2004). The Child and Adolescent Clinical Trials Network (CAPTN).Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43, 515–518.
15.
MarchJ. S., SilvaS. S., ComptonS., ShapiroM., CaliffR., & KrishnanR. (2005). The case for practice clinical trials in psychiatry.American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 836–846.
16.
MattisonR. E. (1999). Use of psychotropic medications in special education students with serious emotional disturbance.Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 9, 149–155.
17.
MattisonR. E. (2000). School consultation: A review of research on issues unique to the school environment.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 402–413.
18.
MattisonR. E. (2004a). Psychiatric and psychological assessment of emotional and behavioral disorders during school mental health consultation. In RutherfordR. B., QuinnM. M., & MathurS. R. (Eds.), Handbook of research in emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 163–180). New York: Guilford Press.
19.
MattisonR. E. (2004b). Universal measures of school functioning in middle school special education students.Behavioral Disorders, 29, 359–371.
20.
MattisonR. E., & FelixB. C. (1997). The course of elementary and secondary school students with SED through their special education experience.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 5, 107–117.
21.
MattisonR. E., & SpitznagelE. L. (2001). Longitudinal use of the Teacher's Report Form in tracking outcome for students with SED.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 9, 86–93.
22.
MattisonR. E., SpitznagelE. L., & FelixB. C. (1998). Enrollment predictors of the special education outcome for students with SED.Behavioral Disorders, 23, 243–256.
23.
PennoD. A., FrankA. R., & WackerD. P. (2000). Instructional accommodations for adolescent students with severe emotional or behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 25, 325–343.
24.
ReyJ. M., SinghM., HungS., DossetorD. R., NewmanL., & PlappJ. M. (1997). A global scale to measure the quality of the family environment.Archives of General Psychiatry, 54, 817–822.
25.
WagnerM. M., KutashK., DuchnowskiA. J., & EpsteinM. H. (2005). The Special Education Longitudinal Study and the National Longitudinal Study: Study designs and implications for children and youth with emotional disturbance.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 135, 25–41.
26.
WagnerM. M., MarderC., BlackorbyJ., CametoR., NewmanL., & LevineP. (2003). The achievements of youth with disabilities during secondary school: A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2.Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
27.
WagnerM., NewmanL., CametoR., & LevineP. (2005). Changes over time in the early post-school outcomes of youth with disabilities: A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Study-2 (NLTS-2).Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
28.
WalkerH. M., Block-PedigoA., TodisB., & SeversonH. (1991). School Archival Records Search (SARS): User's guide and technical manual.Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
29.
WechslerD. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (3rd ed.). New York: Psychological Corporation.
WeersingV. R. (2005). Benchmarking the effectiveness of psychotherapy: Program evaluation as a component of evidence-based practice.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 44, 1058–1062.
32.
WoodcockR. W. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests–Revised.Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
