This paper presents results from a study initiated by a consortium of non-public special education facilities to respond to issues of accountability. Research questions were (a) How do students from the most restrictive therapeutic non-public special education facilities compare with other nationally published studies?; and (b) How do positive and negative discharge students differ in transition experiences after leaving a restrictive therapeutic nonpublic special education facility? Three cohorts of EBD students discharged 1994–1997 from seven non-public special education facilities in Maryland were tracked for three years using a longitudinal panel design with telephone interview surveys. Descriptive results are presented, which indicated that students who received intensive and specialized services in non-public education centers completed/graduated (positive discharges) at a much higher rate than national and regional averages and had lower arrest rates at the end of three years. This sample was most independent at Year 2 (employment, living situation, and related outcomes), but by Year 3, level of independence was lower than Year 1. Limitations and implications of findings are discussed.
BlackorbyJ., & WagnerM. (1996). Longitudinal post school outcomes for youth with disabilities: Findings form the national longitudinal transition study.Exceptional Children, 62(5), 399–413.
3.
BullisM., YovanoffP., MuellerG., & HavelE. (2002). Life on the “outs”: Examination of the faculty to community transition of incarcerated youth.Exceptional Children, 69(1), 7–22.
4.
CarranD. T., NemerofskyA. G., RockE. E., & KerinsM. R. (1996). Risk of unsuccessful program completion for students with emotional/behavioral disorders: An epidemiological risk analysis.Behavioral Disorders, 21(2), 172–189.
5.
CarsonR., SitlingtonP., & FrankA. (1995). Young adulthood for individuals with behavioral disorders: What does it hold?Behavioral Disorders, 20, 127–135.
6.
Chesapeake Institute. (1994). National agenda for achieving better results for children and youth with serious emotional disturbanceWashington, DC: Chesapeake Institute.
7.
ColemanM., WebberJ., & AlgozzineB. (1999). Inclusion and students with emotional/behavioral disorders.Special Services in the Schools, 15, 25–47.
8.
DavisM., & Vander StoepA. (1997). The transition to adulthood for youth who have serious emotional disturbance: Developmental transition and young adult outcomes.The Journal of Mental Health Administration, 24(4), 400–427.
9.
EdgarE. (1995). First decade after graduation (Final report). Report No. HO23C00079. Seattle, WA.: University of Washington. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED393573.)
10.
EdgarE., MalmgrenK., & NeelR. S. (1998). Postschool status of youths with behavior disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 23(4), 257–63.
11.
EllicksonP., SanerH., & McGuiganK. A. (1997). Profiles of violent youth: Substance use and other concurrent problems.American Journal of Public Health, 8(6), 985–991.
12.
ElliotD. S., AgetonS. S., HuizingaD., KnowlesB. A., & CanterR. J. (1983). The prevalence and incidence of delinquent behavior: 1976–1980.Boulder, CO: Behavioral Research Institute.
13.
FaeddaG. L., BaldessariniR. J., SuppesT., TondoL., BeckerI., & LipschitzD. S. (1995). Pediatric-onset bipolar disorder: A neglected clinical and public health problem.Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 3(4), 171–195.
14.
FamularoR., KinscherffR., & FentonT. (1992a). Psychiatric diagnoses of abusive mothers: A preliminary report.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 180(10), 658–661.
15.
FamularoR., KinscherffR., & FentonT. (1992b). Psychiatric diagnoses of maltreated children: Preliminary findings.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 31(5), 863–867.
16.
FarmerT. W., QuinnM. M., HusseyW., & HolahanT. (2001). The development of disruptive behavioral disorders and correlated constraints: Implications for intervention.Behavioral Disorders, 26(2), 117–130.
17.
GreenbaumP. E., DedrickR. F., FreidmanR. M., KutashK., BrownE. C., LardieriS. P., & PughA. M. (1996). National Adolescent and Child Treatment Study (NACTS): Outcomes for children with serious emotional and behavioral disturbance.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4(3), 130–146.
18.
GreenbaumP. E., DedrickR. F., FreidmanR. M., KutashK., BrownE. G., LardieriS. P., & PughA. M. (1998). National Adolescent and Child Treatment Study (NACTS): Outcomes for children with serious emotional and behavioral disturbance. In EpsteinM. H., KutachK., & DuchnowskiA. (Eds.), Outcomes for children and youth with behavioral and emotional disorders and their families: Programs and /evaluation best practices (pp. 21–54) Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
19.
GurucharriC., PhelpsE., & SelmanR. (1984). Development of interpersonal understanding: A longitudinal and comparative study of normal and disturbed youths.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 26–36.
20.
JoffeR., DobsonK., FineS., MarriageK., & HaleyG. (1990). Social problem solving in depressed, conduct-disordered and normal adolescents.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 18(5), 565–575.
21.
JordanB. K., SchlengerW. E., FairbankJ. A., & CaddellJ. M. (1996). Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among incarcerated women: Convicted felons entering prison.Archives of General Psychiatry, 53(6), 513–519.
22.
KauffmanJ. M., BantzJ., & McCulloughJ. (2002). Separate and better: A special public school class for students with emotional and behavioral disorders.Exceptionality10(3), 149–170.
23.
KauffmanJ. M., & HallahanD. P. (1990). What we want for children: A rejoinder to REI proponents.Journal of Special Education, 24(3), 340–345.
24.
MatthysW., WalterbosW., & Van EngelandH. (1995). Conduct-disordered boys’ perception of their like peers.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19, 357–372.
25.
MattisonR. E., & FelixB. C. (1997). The course of elementary and secondary school students with SED through their special education experience.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 5(2), 107–207. Retrieved January 30, 2003, from Academic Search Premier database.
26.
MattisonR. E., SpitznagelE. L., & FelixB. C. (1998). Enrollment predictors of the special education outcome for students with SED.Behavioral Disorders, 23(4), 243–255.
27.
MenardS. (1991). Longitudinal research. (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences No. 76). Newberry Park, CA: Sage.
28.
National Center for Education Statistics. (1993a). National education longitudinal study of 1988: NELS: 88 questionnaires, base year through second follow-up. (Volume I, base year 1988). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
29.
National Center for Education Statistics. (1993b). National education longitudinal study of 1988: NELS: 88 questionnaires, base year through second follow-up. (Volume II, first follow-up 1990). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
30.
National Center for Education Statistics. (1993c). National education longitudinal study of 1988: NELS: 88 questionnaires, base year through second follow-up. (Volume III, follow-up 1992). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
31.
ReddyL. A. (2001). Serious emotional disturbance in children and adolescents: Current status and future directions.Behavior Therapy, 32, 667–691.
32.
TobinT. J., & SugaiG. M. (1999). Discipline problems, placements, and outcomes for students with Serious, Emotional Disturbance.Behavioral Disorders, 24(2), 109–121.
WagnerM. M. (1995). Outcomes for youths with serious emotional disturbance in secondary school and early adulthood.Future of Children, 5(2), 90–112.
35.
WagnerM., NewmanL., D'AicoR., JayE. D., Butler-NalinP., & CoxR. (1991). Youth with disabilities: How are they doing? The first comprehensive study of special education students.Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
36.
WehmanP. (1992). Life beyond the classroom: Transition strategies for young people with disabilities.Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
