The authors reviewed published experimental studies to examine the effectiveness of cooperative learning as an instructional model for students with emotional and behavioral disorders (E/BD). Eight articles met search selection criteria for inclusion in this review. Results of the studies are discussed within the context of their methodological strengths and weaknesses, as well as the implications for using cooperative learning methods with students with E/BD. Implications for future research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AntilL. R., JenkinsJ. R., WayneS. K., & VadasyP. F. (1998). Cooperative learning: Prevalence, conceptualizations, and the relation between research and practice.American Educational Research Journal, 35, 419–454.
2.
CampbellD. T., & StanleyJ. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research.Chicago: Rand-McNally.
3.
CarnineD. (1997). Bridging the research-to-practice gap.Exceptional Children, 63, 513–522.
4.
CartledgeG., & CochranL. (1993). Developing cooperative learning behaviors in students with behavior disorders.Preventing School Failure, 37, 5–10.
5.
CosdenM. A., & HaringT. G. (1992). Cooperative learning in the classroom: Contingencies, group interactions, and students with special needs.Journal of Behavioral Education, 2, 53–71.
6.
FarmerT. W. (in press). Misconceptions of peer rejection and problem behaviors: A social interactional perspective of the adjustment of aggressive youth with mild disabilities.Remedial and Special Education.
7.
GoorM. B., & SchwennJ. O. (1993). Accommodating diversity and disability with cooperative learning.Intervention in School and Clinic, 29(1), 6–16.
8.
GreshamF. M., LaneK. L., MacMillanD. L., & BocianK. M. (1999). Social and academic profiles of externalizing and internalizing groups: Risk factors for emotional and behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 24, 231–245.
9.
GunterP. L., DennyR. K., JackS. L., ShoresR. E., & NelsonC. M. (1993). Aversive stimuli in academic interactions between students with serious emotional disturbance and their teachers.Behavioral Disorders, 18, 265–274.
10.
GunterP. L., DennyR. K., ShoresR. E., ReedT. M., JackS. L., & NelsonC. M. (1994). Teacher escape, avoidance, and countercontrol behaviors: Potential responses to disruptive and aggressive behaviors of students with severe behavior disorders.Journal of Child and Family Studies, 3, 211–223.
11.
HunterM. (1984). Knowing, teaching, and supervising. In HosfordP. L. (Ed.), Using what we know about teaching (pp. 169–195). Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
12.
JohnsonD. W., & JohnsonR. T. (1975). Learning together and alone.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13.
JohnsonD. W., & JohnsonR. T. (1982). The effects of cooperative and individualistic instruction on handicapped and nonhandicapped students.The Journal of Social Psychology, 118, 257–268.
14.
JohnsonD. W., & JohnsonR. T. (1984a). Building acceptance of differences between handicapped and nonhandicapped students: The effects of cooperative and individualistic instruction.The Journal of Social Psychology, 122, 257–267.
15.
JohnsonD. W., & JohnsonR. T. (1984b). The effects of intergroup cooperation and intergroup competition on ingroup and outgroup cross-handicap relationships.The Journal of Social Psychology, 124, 85–94.
16.
JohnsonD. W., & JohnsonR. T. (1989). Cooperative learning: What special education teachers need to know.The Pointer, 33(2), 5–10.
17.
JohnsonD. W., & JohnsonR. T. (1991). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
18.
JohnsonD. W., JohnsonR. T., WarringD., & MaruyamaG. (1986). Different cooperative learning procedures and cross-handicap relationships.Exceptional Children, 53, 247–252.
19.
JohnsonD. W., MaruyamaG., JohnsonR., NelsonD., & SkonL. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 89, 47–62.
20.
JohnsonR. T., JohnsonD. W., ScottL. E., & RamolaeB. A. (1985). Effects of single-sex and mixed-sex cooperative interaction on science achievement and attitudes and cross-handicap and cross-sex relationships.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 207–220.
21.
JohnsonR. T., RyndersJ., JohnsonD. W., SchmidtB., & HaiderS. (1979). Interaction between handicapped and nonhandicapped teenagers as a function of situational goal structuring: Implications for mainstreaming.American Educational Research Journal, 16, 161–167.
22.
KauffmanJ. M. (1999). The role of science in behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 24, 265–272.
23.
KauffmanJ. M. (in press). Characteristics of children's behavior disorders (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
24.
KavaleK. A., MathurS. R., FornessS. R., QuinnM. M., & RutherfordR. B. (2000). Right reason in the integration of group and single-subject research in behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 25, 142–157.
25.
KazdinA. E. (1982). Single-case research designs.New York: Oxford.
26.
KeelM. C., DangelH. L., & OwensS. H. (1999). Selecting instructional interventions for students with mild disabilities in inclusive classrooms.Focus on Exceptional Children, 3(8), 1–16.
27.
MaddenN. A., & SlavinR. E. (1983). Effects of cooperative learning on the social acceptance of mainstreamed academically handicapped students.Journal of Special Education, 17, 171–182.
28.
MalmgrenK. W. (1998). Cooperative learning as an academic intervention for students with mild disabilities.Focus on Exceptional Children, 31(4), 1–8.
29.
MathurS. R., KavaleK. A., QuinnM. M., FornessS. R., & RutherfordR. B. (1998). Social skills interventions with students with emotional and behavioral problems: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research.Behavioral Disorders, 23, 193–201.
30.
McGraw-Hill., (1980). California Achievement Tests.Monterey, CA: Author.
31.
MeadowsN. B., NeelR. S., ScottC. M., & ParkerG. (1994). Academic performance, social competence, and mainstream accommodations: A look at mainstreamed and nonmainstreamed students with serious behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 19, 170–180.
32.
NelsonJ. R., JohnsonA., & Marchand-Martel laN. (1996). Effects of direct instruction, cooperative learning, and independent learning practices on the classroom behavior of students with behavioral disorders: A comparative analysis.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 53–62.
33.
O'ConnerR. E., & JenkinsJ. R. (1996). Cooperative learning as an inclusion strategy: A closer look.Exceptionality, 6(1), 29–51.
34.
O'MeliaM. C., & RosenbergM. S. (1994). Effects of cooperative homework teams on the acquisition of mathematics skills by secondary students with mild disabilities.Exceptional Children, 60, 538–548.
35.
OllendickT. H., WeistM. D., BordenM. C., & GreeneR. W. (1992). Sociometric status and academic, behavioral, and psychological adjustment: A five-year longitudinal study.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 80–87.
36.
PomplunM. (1996). Cooperative groups: Alternative assessment for students with disabilities?The Journal of Special Education, 30, 1–17.
37.
PomplunM. (1997). When students with disabilities participate in cooperative groups.Exceptional Children, 64, 49–58.
38.
PopeA. W., BiermanK. L., & MummaG. H. (1991). Aggression, hyperactivity, and inattention-immaturity: Behavior dimensions associated with peer rejection in elementary school boys.Developmental Psychology, 27, 663–671.
39.
PraterM. A., BruhlS., & SemaL. A. (1998). Acquiring social skills through cooperative learning and teacher-directed instruction.Remedial and Special Education, 19, 160–172.
40.
PumaM. J., JonesC. C., RockD., & FernandezR. (1993). Prospects: The congressionally mandated Study of Educational Growth and Opportunity (Interim Rep.).Bethesda, MD: Abt.
41.
QuinnM. M., Jannasch-PennellA., & RutherfordR. B. (1995). Using peers as social skills training agents for students with antisocial behavior.Preventing School Failure, 39, 26–31.
42.
RosenshineB., & StevensR. (1986). Teaching functions. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), AERA handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 376–391). New York: Macmillan.
43.
RuhlK. L., & BerlinghofD. H. (1992). Research on improving behaviorally disordered students' academic performance: A review of the literature.Behavioral Disorders, 17, 178–190.
44.
RutherfordR. B., MathurS. R., & QuinnM. M. (1998). Promoting social communication skills through cooperative learning and direct instruction.Education and Treatment of Children, 21, 354–369.
45.
RutherfordR. B., QuinnM. M., & MathurS. R. (1996). Effective strategies for teaching appropriate behaviors to children with emotional/behavioral disorders.Reston, VA: Council for Children with Behavior Disorders. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 391304)
46.
SalendS. J., & SonnenscheinP. (1989). Validating the effectiveness of a cooperative learning strategy through direct observation.Journal of School Psychology, 27, 47–58.
ScruggsT. E., & MastropieriM. A. (1994). The effectiveness of generalization training: A quantitative synthesis of single subject research. In ScruggsT. E., & MastropieriM. A. (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 8, pp. 259–280). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
49.
SimpsonR. L. (1999). Children and youth with emotional and behavioral disorders: A concerned look at the present and a hopeful eye for the future.Behavioral Disorders, 24, 284–292.
50.
SlavinR. E. (1994). A practical guide to cooperative learning.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
51.
SlavinR. E., LeaveyM. B., & MaddenN. A. (1984). Combining cooperative learning and individualized instruction: Effects on student mathematics achievement, attitudes, and behaviors.Elementary School Journal, 84, 409–422.
52.
SlavinR. E., MaddenN. A., & LeaveyM. B. (1984). Effects of cooperative learning and individualized instruction on mainstreamed students.Exceptional Children, 50, 434–443.
53.
SteinbergZ., & KnitzerJ. (1992). Classrooms for emotionally and behaviorally disturbed students: Facing the challenge.Behavioral Disorders, 17, 145–156.
54.
StrainP. S., KohlerF. W., & GreshamF. (1998). Problems in logic and interpretation with quantitative syntheses of single-case research: Mathur and colleagues (1998) as a case in point.Behavioral Disorders, 24, 74–85.
55.
TappJ., & WehbyJ. H. (in press). Observational software for laptop computers and optical bar code time wands. In ThompsonT., FelceD., & SymonsF. (Eds.), Behavioral observation: Computer assisted innovations and applications in developmental disabilities.Baltimore: Brookes.
56.
TappJ., WehbyJ., & EllisD. (1995). A multiple option observation system for experimental studies: MOOSES.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 27, 25–31.
57.
Tateyama-SniezekK. M. (1990). Cooperative learning: Does it improve the academic achievement of students with handicaps?Exceptional Children, 56, 426–07.
58.
U.S. Department of Education. (1995). Seventeenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.Washington, DC: Author.
59.
WalkerH. M., ColvinG., & RamseyE. (1995). Antisocial behavior in schools: Strategies and best practices.Pacific Grove, CA: Brookes/Cole.
60.
WalkerH. M., FornessS. R., KauffmanJ. M., EpsteinM. H., GreshamF. M., NelsonC. M., & StrainP. S. (1998). Macro-social validation: Referencing outcomes in behavioral disorders to societal issues and problems.Behavioral Disorders, 24, 7–18.
61.
WalkerH. M., & McConnellS. R. (1993). The Walker-McConnell Scale of Social Competence and School Adjustment.Eugene: University of Oregon, Center on Human Development.
62.
WehbyJ. H., SymonsF. J., & ShoresR. E. (1995). A descriptive analysis of aggressive behavior in classrooms for children with emotional and behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 20, 87–105.
63.
WoodS. J., & CroninM. E. (1999). Students with emotional/behavioral disorders and transition planning: What the follow-up studies tell us.Psychology in the Schools, 36, 327–345.
