Legal mobilisation, including its use within the pro-migrant movement, has been addressed by scholars from different disciplines. However, its deployment in the socio-spatial dimension of borderlands has received limited attention, despite the increasing use of legal strategies in the real world and the specificity of borderlands as unique sites of contention. This research note contributes to filling this gap through empirical research, prompting a dialogue between socio-legal, contentious politics, migration and border studies. In particular, I present and discuss the preliminary findings of a study on the legal mobilisation of pro-migrant civil society organisations at the Southern European borders. These findings, based on a descriptive quantitative media analysis, provide a first overview of the use of the law by civil society organisations in border areas, making it possible to highlight some trends and suggest some relevant hypotheses to be explored in the course of further research. As such, they contribute to the international migration scholarship and policy community, in that they help to develop the study of political contention around migration, with an innovative focus on the use of the law in border areas. Additionally, they provide fertile ground for strengthening the protection of the rights of people on the move and the promotion of the rule of law, in accordance with the concerns and recommendations expressed by bodies of the United Nations and of the Council of Europe.
AlagnaF.CusumanoE.. 2023. “Against the Tide: The Counter-Repression Strategies of Sea Rescue Organizations in the Mediterranean.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science709 (1): 105–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162241248062.
2.
AllsoppJ.VosyliūtėL.SmialowskiS. B.. 2021. “Picking “Low-Hanging Fruit” While the Orchard Burns: The Costs of Policing Humanitarian Actors in Italy and Greece as a Strategy to Prevent Migrant Smuggling.” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research27 (1): 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-020-09465-0.
3.
AtaçI.RygielK.StierlM.. 2016. “Introduction: The Contentious Politics of Refugee and Migrant Protest and Solidarity Movements: Remaking Citizenship from the Margins.” Citizenship Studies20 (5): 527–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2016.1182681.
4.
BaumgärtelM.2019. Demanding Rights: Europe’s Supranational Courts and the Dilemma of Migrant Vulnerability. Cambridge Asylum and Migration Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677837.
CarreraS.AllsoppJ.VosyliuteL.. 2018a. “Policing the Mobility Society : The Effects of EU-Anti-Migrant Smuggling Policies on Humanitarianism.” International Journal of Migration and Border Studies4: 236–76. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMBS.2018.10015101.
7.
CarreraS.VosyliuteL.AllsoppJ.SmialowskiS.SanchezG.. 2018b. “Fit for Purpose? The Facilitation Directive and the Criminalisation of Humanitarian Assistance to Irregular Migrants: 2018 Update.”
8.
CostelloC.MannI.. 2020. “Border Justice: Migration and Accountability for Human Rights Violations.” German Law Journal21 (3): 311–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.27.
CuttittaP.2018. “Repoliticization Through Search and Rescue? Humanitarian NGOs and Migration Management in the Central Mediterranean.” Geopolitics23 (3): 632–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1344834.
12.
Della PortaD.SteinhilperE., eds. 2021. Contentious Migrant Solidarity. Shrinking Spaces and Civil Society Contestation. 1st ed. London: Routledge.
13.
DziedzicL.2024. “Administrative Lawfare at the European Union’s External Borders: Some Perspectives on Administrative Regulation of NGO Search and Rescue Activities in Italy and the Situation at the Polish-Belarusian Border.” Journal of Human Rights Practice16 (3): 739–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huae028.
FontanariE.2018. Lives in Transit: An Ethnographic Study of Refugees’ Subjectivity Across European Borders. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351234061.
16.
FortarezzaF.2023. ““They Do What Institutions Should Do”: Border Solidarity in the Light of an Institutional Crisis.” PARTECIPAZIONE E CONFLITTO16 (3): 490–509. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v16i3p490.
JenkinsJ. C.1983. “Resource Mobilization Theory and the Study of Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology9: 527–53.
20.
KawarL.2015. Contesting Immigration Policy in Court: Legal Activism and its Radiating Effects in the United States and France. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
21.
LehoucqE.TaylorW. K.. 2020. “Conceptualizing Legal Mobilization: How Should We Understand the Deployment of Legal Strategies?” Law & Social Inquiry45 (1): 166–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2019.59.
22.
McAdamD.1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
NeJaimeD.2011. “Winning Through Losing.” Iowa Law Review96 (January): 941.
25.
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2023. ‘Mandates of the Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of Migrants; the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention; the Special Rapporteur on Contemporary Forms of Slavery, Including Its Causes and Consequences and the Special Rapporteur on Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children. Letter to the Delegation of the European Union’. https://spcommreports.ohchr.org/TMResultsBase/DownLoadPublicCommunicationFile?gId=28674.
26.
PasK. V. D.2024. “All That Glitters Is Not Gold? Civil Society Organisations and the (Non-)Mobilisation of European Union Law.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies62 (2): 525–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13515.
27.
PassalacquaV.2022. “Who Mobilizes the Court? Migrant Rights Defenders Before the Court of Justice of the EU.” Law and Development Review15 (2): 381–405. https://doi.org/10.1515/ldr-2021-0102.
28.
PijnenburgA.PasK. V. D.. 2022. “Strategic Litigation Against European Migration Control Policies: The Legal Battleground of the Central Mediterranean Migration Route.” European Journal of Migration and Law24 (3): 401–29. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12340135.
TarrowS. G.1983. Struggling to Reform: Social Movements and Policy Change During Cycles of Protest. Occasional Paper / Western Societies Program, no. 15. Ithaca, N.Y.: Center for International Studies, Cornell University.
31.
TarrowS. G.. 1989. Democracy and Disorder: Protest and Politics in Italy, 1965–1975. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
32.
TaylorW. K.TarrowS.. 2024. Law, Mobilization, and Social Movements: How Many Masters?1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009493024.
33.
TruccoD.2023. “The Criminalization of Border Solidarity and the Law as a Double-Edged Weapon.” PaCo - Partecipazione & Conflitto16 (3): 470–89. https://doi.org/10.1285/I20356609V16I3P470.
34.
TruccoD.LamarcheK.PhilippeO.. 2023. “At the Border of law: Uses of law in Solidarity with Migrants at Borders.” Droit et Societe113 (1): 181–202.
35.
VanhalaL.2012. “Legal Opportunity Structures and the Paradox of Legal Mobilization by the Environmental Movement in the UK.” Law & Society Review46 (3): 523–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00505.x.
36.
Van HoutumHenkVan NaerssenTon. 2002. “Bordering, Ordering and Othering.” Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie93 (2): 125–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.2002.93.issue-2.
37.
VosyliūtėL.ConteC.. 2019. “Crackdown on NGOs and Volunteers Helping Refugees and Other Migrants, Final Synthetic Report.” ReSoMa. https://www.resoma.eu/node/194
38.
WhittierN.2002. “Meaning and Structure in Social Movements.” In Social Movements, edited by MeyerD. S.WhittierN.RobnettB., 289–308. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195143553.003.0019.
39.
ZemansF. K.1983. “Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of the Law in the Political System.” American Political Science Review77 (3): 690–703. https://doi.org/10.2307/1957268.
