As migration routes and flows shift over time, so do the digital platforms through which migrants communicate and seek information. Among TikTok's billions of users, some individuals have shared footage of their crossing through the Darien gap between Colombia and Panama, offering a never-before-seen perspective to the 160 km jungle. This article explores TikTok's role as a tool for migrants to share unfiltered experiences and navigate the hardships of their journey. Through a comparative ethnographic content analysis (ECA) of 66 TikTok videos and, 7373 comments, this article proposes an original methodology seldom applied in migration research by prioritising migrant voices as a counter-space that actively resists those actors speaking for them. A thematic comparison between migrant-made videos with non-migrant-made videos considers how the latter accentuates narratives of suffering and victimhood; whereas migrant-made videos curate their content to provide practical information to support other migrants, grounded in their personal experience. The themes within migrant-made videos, together with their comments, construct a digital environment conducive to resisting flattening narratives through tools such as empowerment, community building, and practical information sharing. This article contributes beyond a methodological scope by acknowledging how migrant-made videos point to information individuals are seeking concerning their journey: an epistemological gap that, by filling it, could prove conducive to migrant protection strategies. It concludes that the decisive factor between agency-driven versus victimhood-centred content is the storyteller. This article endorses the prioritisation of migrant voices to respond to their requests and steer migration strategies towards a genuinely safe migration.
(APT) Association for the Prevention of Torture. 2021. Principles on Effective Interviewing for Investigations and Information Gathering. https://interviewingprinciples.com/.
4.
AscioneG.2016. “Decolonizing the ‘Global’: The Coloniality of Method and the Problem of the Unit of Analysis.” Cultural Sociology10 (3): 317–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975516644843.
5.
BenjaminG.2022. “#FuckTheAlgorithm: Algorithmic Imaginaries and Political Resistance.” 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ‘22), Seoul, Republic of Korea, June 21–24, 2022. 46–57.
6.
BernalV.2013. “Please Forget Democracy and Justice: Eritrean Politics and the Powers of Humor.” American Ethnologist40 (2): 300–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12022.
7.
BrymanA.2012. Social Research Methods. Fourth edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
BuckinghamS. L., R. D. Langhout, D. Rusch, T. Mehta, N. Rubén Chávez, K. Ferreira van Leer, A. Oberoi, et al. 2021. “The Roles of Settings in Supporting Immigrants’ Resistance to Injustice and Oppression: A Policy Position Statement by the Society for Community Research and Action.” American Journal of Community Psychology68: 269–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12515.
ChouliarakiL.2017. “Symbolic Bordering: The Self-Representation of Migrants and Refugees in Digital News.” Popular Communication2 (15): 78–94. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479830503.
12.
ChouliarakiL.GeorgiouM.. 2022. The Digital Border: Migration, Technology, Power. New York: NYU Press.
13.
Cruz-PiñeiroR.Hernandez HernandezA.IbarraC. S.. 2024. “Commodifying Passage: Ethnographic Insights into Migration, Markets, and Digital Mediation at the Darién Gap and Mexico-Guatemala.” International Migration Review54 (4): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183241274759.
14.
DaltonD.Ramírez PlacenciaD.. 2023. “Imagining Latinidad: Digital Diasporas and Public Engagement Among Latin American Migrants.” Critical Latin America3: 1–259. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004519671.
Fernández de la Reguera AhedoA.Martín del Campo HuertaA.Narváez GutiérrezJ. C.. 2024. “Crossing the Darien With TikTok.” In Digital Culture and the U.S.-Mexico Border, First edition, 60–75. Abingdon-on-Thames, Oxfordshire: Routledge.
18.
FreireP.1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Translated by Myra Bergman Ramos. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group Inc.
GutiérrezE.2018. “The Coloniality of Migration and the ‘Refugee Crisis’: On the Asylum-Migration Nexus, the Transatlantic White European Settler Colonialism-Migration and Racial Capitalism.” Canada's Journal on Refugees34 (1): 16–28. https://doi.org/10.7202/1050851ar.
Jaramillo-DentD.Contreras-PulidoP.Pérez-RodríguezA.. 2022. “Immigrant Influencers on TikTok: Diverse Microcelebrity Profiles and Algorithmic (In)Visibility.” Media and Communication10 (1): 208–21. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i1.4743.
27.
KleinmanA.KleinmanJ.. 1996. “The Appeal of Experience; The Dismay of Images: Cultural Appropriations of Suffering in Our Times.” Daedalus125 (1): 1–23. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20027351.
LinesJ.CintraN.CurcioB.GrugelT.RiggirozziP.. 2024. “Visual Narratives of Care and Reproduction in Forced Migration: Women Displaced from Venezuela to Brazil.” Bulletin of Latin American Research44 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.13579.
30.
MahoneyJ.Le LouvierK.LawsonS.BertelD.AmbrosettiE.. 2022. “Ethical Considerations in Social media Analytics in the Context of Migration: Lessons Learned from a Horizon 2020 Project.” Research Ethics 18 (3): 226–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161221087542.
31.
MassariA.2021. Visual Securitization: Humanitarian Representations and Migration Governance. Cham: Springer.
MorrisJ. C.2023. “(Im)Mobility Economies: Extractivism of the Refugee as a Human Commodity.” Extractive Frontiers: Narratives and Discourses15. https://doi.org/10.4000/poldev.5430
40.
Nikielska-SekulaK.AmandineD.. 2021. Visual Methodology in Migration Studies: New Possibilities, Theoretical Implications, and Ethical Question. Cham: Springer.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
