Unwelcome Immigrants Knocking on the Door: Demographic Features of Immigrants and Populist Attitudes Rising in South American Countries

Abstract

Previous studies examining the link between immigration and populism have found mixed empirical results. By focusing on the populist attitude among native citizens, this article revisits the question of how immigration affects populism. In addition, we investigate this relationship in South America where immigrants are more educated, and skilled and have similar cultural or historical roots to native citizens. By using Latino Barometro data from 2000 to 2018, our empirical analysis of 10 South American countries finds that immigration fuels the populist attitude among citizens in South American countries. We also demonstrate the proportion of working-age immigrants or the level of economic development of immigrants’ home countries can change the influence of immigration on populism. These findings suggest that despite different features of immigration in this region than observed in other regions such as Europe the link between immigration and populism still holds.

Keywords

Migration Populism South America

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

24 Horas. 2021. “‘Recuperemos Chile’: el plan del Partido Republicano que busca detener la “invasión” de migrantes.” 24 Horas, February 8. Available at: https://www.24horas.cl/politica/construir-una-zanja-y-un-campamento-militar-temporal-jose-antonio-kast-propone-10-medidas-para-combatir-la-crisis-migratoria-en-el-norte-de-chile-4644583 (accessed 12 November 2022)

Art

2011. Inside the Radical Right: The Development of Anti-Immigrant Parties in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Arzheimer

2009. “Contextual Factors and the Extreme Right Vote in Western Europe, 1980–2002.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (2): 259–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00369.x.

Barr

R. R.

2009. “Populists, Outsiders and Anti-Establishment Politics.” Party Politics 15 (1): 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068808097890.

Bastia

Piper

. 2019. “Women Migrants in the Global Economy: A Global Overview (and Regional Perspectives).” Gender & Development 27 (1): 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2019.1570734.

Berk

R. A.

Western

Weiss

R. E.

. 1995. “Statistical Inference for Apparent Populations.” Sociological Methodology 25: 421–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/271073.

Berríos-Riquelme

2021. “Labor Market Insertion of Professional Venezuelan Immigrants in Northern Chile: Precariousness and Discrimination in the Light of Migration Policy.” REMHU: Revista Interdisciplinar Da Mobilidade Humana 29 (62), 117–32. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-85852503880006208.

Blinder

2015. “Imagined Immigration: The Impact of Different Meanings of ‘Immigrants’ in Public Opinion and Policy Debates in Britain.” Political Studies 63 (1): 80–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12053.

Blinder

Ford

Ivarsflaten

. 2013. “The Better Angels of our Nature: How the Antiprejudice Norm Affects Policy and Party Preferences in Great Britain and Germany.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (4): 841–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12030.

10.

Blyde

Busso

Ibanez

A. M.

. 2020. The Impact of Migration in Latin America and the Caribbean. A Review of Recent Evidence (IDB Discussion Paper No.IDB-DP-00830). https://doi.org/10.18235/0002866.

11.

Bonhomme

2023. “‘We’re a Bit Browner But We Still Belong to the White Race’: Making Whiteness in the Context of South-South Migration in Chile.” Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies 18 (2): 227–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/17442222.2022.2099170.

12.

Brambor

Clark

W. R.

Golder

. 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political Analysis 14 (1): 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpi014.

13.

Broz

J. L.

Frieden

Weymouth

. 2021. “Populism in Place: The Economic Geography of the Globalization Backlash.” International Organization 75 (2): 464–94. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000314.

14.

Canales

A. I.

2020. “La inmigración contemporánea en Chile. Entre la diferenciación étnico-nacional y la desigualdad de clases.” Papeles de Población 25 (100): 53–85. https://doi.org/10.22185/24487147.2019.100.13.

15.

Caruso

Canon

C. G.

Mueller

. 2021. “Spillover Effects of the Venezuelan Crisis: Migration Impacts in Colombia.” Oxford Economic Papers 73 (2): 771–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpz072.

16.

Castanho Silva

Jungkunz

Helbling

Littvay

. 2020. “An Empirical Comparison of Seven Populist Attitudes Scales.” Political Research Quarterly 73 (2): 409–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919833176.

17.

Cerrutti

2020. “5 Salient Facts About Intra-Regional Migration in South America.” Migration Data Portal. Available at: https://www.migrationdataportal.org/blog/5-salient-facts-about-intra-regional-migration-south-america (accessed 19 December 2022).

18.

Cerrutti

Parrado

. 2015. “Intraregional Migration in South America: Trends and a Research Agenda.” Annual Review of Sociology 41: 399–421. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112249.

19.

Chakrabarty

Jha

M. K.

. 2022. “Social Construction of Migrant Identities: Everyday Life of Bangladeshi Migrants in West Bengal.” Community Development Journal 57 (4): 731–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsab003.

20.

Chavez-Dueñas

N. Y.

Adames

H. Y.

Organista

K. C.

. 2014. “Skin-Color Prejudice and Within-Group Racial Discrimination: Historical and Current Impact on Latino/a Populations.” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 36 (1): 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986313511306.

21.

Contreras

Gallardo

. 2020. “The Effects of Mass Migration on Natives’ Wages: Evidence From Chile.” (IDB Discussion Paper No. IDB-DP-825). https://doi.org/10.18235/0002790.

22.

Dancygier

R. M.

2010. Immigration and Conflict in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

23.

De La Torre

2016. “Left-wing Populism: Inclusion and Authoritarianism in Venezuela, Bolivia, and Ecuador.” Brown Journal of World Affairs 23 (1): 61–76.

24.

Donovan

2019. “Authoritarian Attitudes and Support for Radical Right Populists.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 29 (4): 448–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2019.1666270.

25.

Donovan

2021. “Right Populist Parties and Support for Strong Leaders.” Party Politics 27 (5): 858–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688209208.

26.

Doyle

2011. “The Legitimacy of Political Institutions: Explaining Contemporary Populism in Latin America.” Comparative Political Studies 44 (11): 1447–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011407469.

27.

Dunn

2015. “Preference for Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties among Exclusive-Nationalists and Authoritarians.” Party Politics 21 (3): 367–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812472587.

28.

Durand

Massey

D. S.

. 2010. “New World Orders: Continuities and Changes in Latin American Migration.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 630 (1): 20–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716210368102.

29.

Eichengreen

2018. The Populist Temptation: Economic Grievance and Political Reaction in the Modern Era. New York: Oxford University Press.

30.

Espenshade

T. J.

Hempstead

. 1996. “Contemporary American Attitudes Toward US Immigration.” International Migration Review 30 (2): 535–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/019791839603000207.

31.

Federico

C. M.

Hunt

C. V.

Fisher

E. L.

. 2013. “Uncertainty and Status-Based Asymmetries in the Distinction Between the “Good” Us and the “Bad” Them: Evidence That Group Status Strengthens the Relationship Between the Need for Cognitive Closure and Extremity in Intergroup Differentiation.” Journal of Social Issues 69 (3): 473–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12025.

32.

Filc

2009. The Political Right in Israel: Different Faces of Jewish Populism. London: Routledge.

33.

Flores

R. D.

Schachter

. 2018. “Who are the “Illegals”? The Social Construction of Illegality in the United States.” American Sociological Review 83 (5): 839–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418794635.

34.

Freier

L. F.

Pérez

L. M.

. 2021. “Nationality-Based Criminalisation of South-South Migration: The Experience of Venezuelan Forced Migrants in Peru.” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 27 (1): 113–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-020-09475-y.

35.

Gidengil

Hennigar

Blais

Nevitte

. 2005. “Explaining the Gender Gap in Support for the New Right: The Case of Canada.” Comparative Political Studies 38 (10): 1171–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005279320.

36.

Gidron

Bonikowski

. 2013. Varieties of Populism: Literature Review and Research Agenda (Weatherhead Working Paper Series, No. 13-0004).

37.

Golder

2016. “Far Right Parties in Europe.” Annual Review of Political Science 19: 477–97. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042814-012441.

38.

Goñi

2017. Argentina Sees Migration Ban and Border Wall Proposals in Immigration Row. The Guardian, February 3. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/feb/03/argentina-sees-migration-ban-and-border-wall-proposals-in-immigration-row. (accessed 10 December 2022).

39.

Gründl

Aichholzer

. 2020. “Support for the Populist Radical Right: Between Uncertainty Avoidance and Risky Choice.” Political Psychology 41 (4): 641–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12643.

40.

Guriev

Papaioannou

. 2022. “The Political Economy of Populism.” Journal of Economic Literature 60 (3): 753–832. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20201595.

41.

Hainmueller

Hiscox

M. J.

. 2010. “Attitudes Toward Highly Skilled and Low-Skilled Immigration: Evidence from a Survey Experiment.” American Political Science Review 104 (1): 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055409990372.

42.

Hainmueller

Hopkins

D. J.

. 2014. “Public Attitudes Toward Immigration.” Annual Review of Political Science 17 (1): 225–49. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-102512-194818.

43.

Halla

Wagner

A. F.

Zweimüller

. 2017. “Immigration and Voting for the Far Right.” Journal of the European Economic Association 15 (6): 1341–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvx003.

44.

Hawkins

K. A.

2009. “Is Chávez Populist? Measuring Populist Discourse in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (8): 1040–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009331721.

45.

Hawkins

K. A.

2010. Venezuela's Chavismo and Populism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

46.

Hawkins

K. A.

Kaltwasser

C. R.

Andreadis

. 2020. “The Activation of Populist Attitudes.” Government and Opposition 55 (2): 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2018.23.

47.

Hawkins

K. A.

Rovira Kaltwasser

. 2017. “What the (Ideational) Study of Populism Can Teach us, and What it Can't.” Swiss Political Science Review 23 (4): 526–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12281.

48.

2017. Anti-Immigration Rhetoric Spreads Across Latin America. Equal Times, March 27. Available at: https://www.Equaltimes.Org/Anti-Immigration-Rhetoric?Lang=en#.Y_F6UCaZO3A (accessed 27 November 2023).

49.

Heizmann

2015. “Social Policy and Perceived Immigrant Labor Market Competition in Europe: Is Prevention Better Than Cure?” Social Forces 93 (4): 1655–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sou116.

50.

Herrera

Gómez

. 2022. “Introduction: Emergent Issues of South American Migrations.” In Migration in South America: IMISCOE Regional Reader, edited by Herrera

Gómez

, 1–23. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11061-0_1..

51.

Hobolt

Anduiza

Carkoglu

Lutz

Sauger

. 2016. "Democracy Divided? People, Politicians and the Politics of Populism.” CSES Planning Committee Module 5: 1–16.

52.

Hogg

M. A.

Kruglanski

Van den Bos

. 2013. “Uncertainty and the Roots of Extremism.” Journal of Social Issues 69: 407–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12021.

53.

Hunger

Paxton

. 2022. “What's in a Buzzword? A Systematic Review of the State of Populism Research in Political Science.” Political Science Research and Methods 10 (3): 617–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2021.44.

54.

IDB, and OECD. 2021. Migration Flows in Latin America and the Caribbean: Statistics on Permits of Migrants. https://doi.org/10.18235/0003665

55.

Igarashi

Miwa

Ono

. 2022. “Why do Citizens Prefer High-Skilled Immigrants to Low-Skilled Immigrants? Identifying Causal Mechanisms of Immigration Preferences with a Survey Experiment.” Research & Politics 9 (2): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680221091439.

56.

Jun

2019. ““Voices of Ordinary Citizens”: Ban Damunhwa and Its Neoliberal Affect of Anti-Immigration in South Korea.” Critical Asian Studies 51 (3): 386–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2019.1619466.

57.

Kaltwasser

C. R.

Van Hauwaert

S. M.

. 2020. “The Populist Citizen: Empirical Evidence from Europe and Latin America.” European Political Science Review 12 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773919000262

58.

Levitsky

Loxton

. 2013. “Populism and Competitive Authoritarianism in the Andes.” Democratization 20 (1): 107–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.738864.

59.

Lubbers

Gijsberts

Scheepers

. 2002. “Extreme Right-Wing Voting in Western Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (3): 345–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00015.

60.

Madrid

R. L.

2018. “The Emergence of Ethno-Populism in Latin America.” In Routledge Handbook of Global Populism. (1st ed.), edited by

Carlos de la Torre

, 163–175. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.

61.

Malhotra

Newman

. 2017. “Explaining Immigration Preferences: Disentangling Skill and Prevalence.” Research & Politics 4 (4): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168017734076.

62.

Malka

Lelkes

Bakker

B. N.

Spivack

. 2020. “Who Is Open to Authoritarian Governance Within Western Democracies?” Perspectives on Politics 20 (3): 808–827. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592720002091.

63.

Martinez-Correa

Peñaloza-Pacheco

Gasparini

. 2022. “Latin American Brotherhood? Immigration and Preferences for Redistribution.” The Journal of Development Studies 58 (2): 234–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2021.1961748.

64.

Mazza

Sohnen

. 2011. Labor Migration in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Look at New Trends and Policies. (Technical Notes No. IDB-TN-205), December. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/viewer/Labor%20Migration%20in%20Latin%20America%20and%20the%20Caribbean_%20A%20Look%20at%20new%20trends%20and%20Policies.pdf.

65.

Mcauliffe

Traindafyllidou

, eds. 2021. World Migration Report 2022. Geneva: International Organization for Migration (IOM).

66.

Meseguer

Kemmerling

. 2018. “What Do You Fear? Anti-Immigrant Sentiment in Latin America.” International Migration Review 52 (1): 236–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12269.

67.

Monk

E. P.

Jr.

2016. “The Consequences of “Race and Color” in Brazil.” Social Problems 63 (3): 413–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spw014.

68.

Mudde

2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39 (4): 541–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x.

69.

Mudde

2012. The Relationship Between Immigration and Nativism in Europe and North America. Washington DC: Migration Policy Institute.

70.

Mudde

Kaltwasser

C. R.

. 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

71.

Norris

. 2017. Is Western Democracy Backsliding? Diagnosing the Risks.” (Harvard Kennedy School Working Paper No. RWP17-012). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2933655.

72.

Norris

Inglehart

. 2019. Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

73.

OECD. 2023. Labour Force Participation Rate (Indicator). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/8a801325-en.(accessed on 06 January 2024).

74.

Olivieri

Ortega

Rivadeneira

Carranza

. 2022. “Shoring Up Economic Refugees: Venezuelan Migrants in the Ecuadoran Labor Market.” Migration Studies 9 (4): 1590–625. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnab037.

75.

Peñaloza-Pacheco

2022. “Living with the Neighbors: The Effect of Venezuelan Forced Migration on the Labor Market in Colombia.” Journal for Labour Market Research 56 (1): 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12651-022-00318-3.

76.

Raijman

Semyonov

. 2004. “Perceived Threat and Exclusionary Attitudes Towards Foreign Workers in Israel.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 27 (5): 780–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141987042000246345.

77.

Raijman

Semyonov

Schmidt

. 2003. “Do Foreigners Deserve Rights? Determinants of Public Views Towards Foreigners in Germany and Israel.” European Sociological Review 19 (4): 379–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/19.4.379.

78.

Reeskens

Velasco Aguilar

. 2021. “Being White is a Full Time Job? Explaining Skin Tone Gradients in Income in Mexico.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 47 (1): 46–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1775071.

79.

Roberts

K. M.

2006. “Populism, Political Conflict, and Grass-Roots Organization in Latin America.” Comparative Politics 38 (2): 127–148. https://doi.org/10.2307/20433986.

80.

Roberts

K. M.

2007. “Latin America's Populist Revival.” The SAIS Review of International Affairs 27 (1): 3–15. http://doi.org/10.1353/sais.2007.0018.

81.

Rodrik

2018. “Populism and the Economics of Globalization.” Journal of International Business Policy 1 (1): 12–33. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-018-0001-4.

82.

Ryu

Paudel

. 2022. “Refugee Inflow and Labor Market Outcomes in Brazil: Evidence from the Venezuelan Exodus.” Population and Development Review 48 (1): 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12452.

83.

Sánchez

A. R.

Fasang

A. E.

Harkness

. 2021. “Temporary Shocks or Durable Change?” Demographic Research 45: 1297–316. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2021.45.43

84.

Semyonov

Raijman

Tov

A. Y.

Schmidt

. 2004. “Population Size, Perceived Threat, and Exclusion: A Multiple-Indicators Analysis of Attitudes Toward Foreigners in Germany.” Social Science Research 33 (4): 681–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2003.11.003.

85.

Shehaj

Shin

A. J.

Inglehart

. 2021. “Immigration and Right-Wing Populism: An Origin Story.” Party Politics 27 (2): 282–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819849888.

86.

Sides

Citrin

. 2007. “European Opinion About Immigration: The Role of Identities, Interests and Information.” British Journal of Political Science 37 (3): 477–504. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123407000257.

87.

Steenbergen

M. R.

Jones

B. S.

. 2002. “Modeling Multilevel Data Structures.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 218–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088424.

88.

Stephan

W. G.

Renfro

C. L.

. 2002. “The Role of Threat in Intergroup Relations.” In From Prejudice to Intergroup Emotions: Differentiated Reactions to Social Groups, edited by Mackie

D. M.

Smith

E. R.

, 191–208. New York: Psychology Press.

89.

Stubager

2013. “The Changing Basis of Party Competition: Education, Authoritarian–Libertarian Values and Voting.” Government and Opposition 48 (3): 372–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2013.13.

90.

Swank

Betz

H.-G.

. 2003. “Globalization, the Welfare State and Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe.” Socio-Economic Review 1 (2): 215–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/soceco/1.2.215.

91.

Tajfel

Turner

J. C.

. 1986. “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior.” In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by Austin

W. G.

Worchel

, 7–24. Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers.

92.

Telles

Flores

R. D.

Urrea-Giraldo

. 2015. “Pigmentocracies: Educational Inequality, Skin Color and Census Ethnoracial Identification in Eight Latin American Countries.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 40: 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSSM.2015.02.002.

93.

Thompson

2022. The Retirement Income of the Prime Working Aged (SEHSD Working paper No. 2022-21/SIPP-Working Paper No. 304). U.S. Census Working paper, September. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2022/demo/sehsd-wp2022-21.pdf.

94.

U.N. DESA. 2020. International Migrant Stock 2020 United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/content/international-migrant-stock.

95.

Van Hauwaert

S. M.

Van Kessel

. 2018. “Beyond Protest and Discontent: A Cross-National Analysis of the Effect of Populist Attitudes and Issue Positions on Populist Party Support.” European Journal of Political Research 57 (1): 68–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12216.

96.

Villarreal

2010. “Stratification by Skin Color in Contemporary Mexico.” American Sociological Review 75 (5): 652–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122410378232.

97.

Wegscheider

Rovira Kaltwasser

Van Hauwaert

S. M.

. 2023. “How Citizens’ Conceptions of Democracy Relate to Positive and Negative Partisanship Towards Populist Parties.” West European Politics 46 (7): 1235–1263. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2023.2199376.

98.

Weyland

2001. “Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics.” Comparative Politics 34 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/422412.

99.

Weyland

2013. “Latin America's Authoritarian Drift: The Threat from the Populist Left.” Journal of Democracy 24 (3): 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2013.0045.

100.

Weyland

. 2018. Populism and authoritarianism. In Routledge Handbook of Global Populism. (1st ed.), edited by

Carlos de la Torre

, 319–333. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.

101.

Weyland

2021. “How Populism Corrodes Latin American Parties.” Journal of Democracy 32 (4): 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2021.0051.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.44 MB