The debate on immigration policy and enforcement in the United States often revolves around the phenomenon of sanctuary cities. While past research accounts for Americans’ attitudes toward sanctuary cities and the effects of sanctuary policies on immigrant and Latino communities, less is known about how potential migrants factor sanctuary status into moving choices. We implement a conjoint survey experiment in Mexico, in which we ask respondents to rate the attractiveness of hypothetical localities in the United States described in terms of several attributes, including immigration enforcement policies. Results show that sanctuary status increases the attractiveness of potential immigration destinations in the United States. However, its effect is overshadowed by preferences for localities with many jobs and low crime rates, as well as ones that voted for Biden in 2020. Despite emphasis on sanctuary cities in U.S. political rhetoric, sanctuary policies only modestly increase the attractiveness of destinations for potential migrants.
AlbouyDavidChoHeepyungShappoMariya. 2021. “Immigration and the Pursuit of Amenities.” Journal of Regional Science61(1): 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12475
2.
Amuedo-DorantesCatalinaDezaMonica. 2022. “Can Sanctuary Policies Reduce Domestic Violence?” American Law and Economics Review24(1): 116–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahab014
3.
Amuedo-DorantesCatalinaPuttitanunThitimaLopezMary. 2022. “Immigration, Sanctuary Policies, and Public Safety.” International Migration Review56(3): 668–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183211043110
4.
AsadAsad L.RosenEva. 2019. “Hiding Within Racial Hierarchies: How Undocumented Immigrants Make Residential Decisions in an American City.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies45(11): 1857–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1532787
5.
AscherioMarta.2022. “Do Sanctuary Policies Increase Crime? Contrary Evidence from a County-Level Investigation in the United States.” Social Science Research106: 102743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102743
6.
BansakKirkHainmuellerJensHopkinsDaniel J.YamamotoTeppei. 2018. “The Number of Choice Tasks and Survey Satisficing in Conjoint Experiments.” Political Analysis26(1): 112–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2017.40
7.
BauderHarald.2017. “Sanctuary Cities: Policies and Practices in International Perspective.” International Migration55(2): 174–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12308
8.
BennourSalomonManatschalAnitaRuedinDidier. 2022. “How Political Reception Contexts Shape Location Decisions of Immigrants.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies48(19): 4730–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2022.2098468
CarrerasMiguelViscontiGiancarloAcacioIgor. 2021. “The Trump Election and Attitudes Toward the United States in Latin America.” Public Opinion Quarterly85(4): 1092–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfab055
11.
CasellasJason P.WallaceSophia Jordan. 2020. “Sanctuary Cities: Public Attitudes Toward Enforcement Collaboration Between Local Police and Federal Immigration Authorities.” Urban Affairs Review56(1): 32–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087418776115
12.
CollingwoodLorenGonzalez O’BrienBenjaminTafoyaJoe R.. 2020. “Partisan Learning or Racial Learning: Opinion Change on Sanctuary City Policy Preferences in CA and TX.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics5(1): 92–129. https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2019.25
13.
CollingwoodLorenMartinezGabrielOskooiiKassra A. R. 2023. “Undermining Sanctuary? When Local and National Partisan Cues Diverge.” Urban Affairs Review59(1): 133–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211043867
14.
DhingraRevaKilbornMitchellWoldemikaelOlivia. 2022. “Immigration Policies and Access to the Justice System: The Effect of Enforcement Escalations on Undocumented Immigrants and Their Communities.” Political Behavior44(3): 1359–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09663-w
15.
DuchRaymond M.LarozeDeniseReinprechtConstantinRobinsonThomas S.. 2022. “Nativist Policy: The Comparative Effects of Trumpian Politics on Migration Decisions.” Political Science Research and Methods10(1): 171–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2020.33
16.
FerwerdaJeremyGestJustin. 2021. “Pull Factors and Migration Preferences: Evidence from the Middle East and North Africa.” International Migration Review55(2): 431–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918320949825
17.
FitzgeraldJenniferLeblangDavidTeetsJessica C.. 2014. “Defying the Law of Gravity: The Political Economy of International Migration.” World Politics66(3): 406–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887114000112
18.
GanterFlavien. 2021. “Identification of Preferences in Forced-Choice Conjoint Experiments: Reassessing the Quantity of Interest.” Political Analysis31(1): 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2021.41
19.
GarciaAngela S.2019. Legal Passing: Navigating Undocumented Life and Local Immigration Law. Oakland: University of California Press.
20.
Gonzalez O’BrienBenjaminCollingwoodLorenEl-KhatibStephen Omar. 2019. “The Politics of Refuge: Sanctuary Cities, Crime, and Undocumented Immigration.” Urban Affairs Review55(1): 3–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087417704974
21.
HainmuellerJensHangartnerDominikYamamotoTeppei. 2015. “Validating Vignette and Conjoint Survey Experiments Against Real-World Behavior.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America112(8): 2395–400. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416587112
22.
HainmuellerJensHopkinsDaniel J.YamamotoTeppei. 2014. “Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments.” Political Analysis22(1): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpt024
23.
HausmanDavid K.2020. “Sanctuary Policies Reduce Deportations Without Increasing Crime.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America117(44): 27262–67. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2014673117
24.
HoriuchiYusakuMarkovichZacharyYamamotoTeppei. 2022. “Does Conjoint Analysis Mitigate Social Desirability Bias?” Political Analysis30(4): 535–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2021.30
25.
HuangXi. 2022. “Do Local Immigrant-Welcoming Efforts Increase Immigration? The Detroit Experience.” Urban Affairs Review58(5): 1340–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211025214
26.
HuangXiLiuCathy Yang. 2018. “Welcoming Cities: Immigration Policy at the Local Government Level.” Urban Affairs Review54(1): 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087416678999
27.
HuoYuen J.DovidioJohn F.JimenezTomas R.SchildkrautDeborah J.. 2018. “Local Policy Proposals Can Bridge Latino and (Most) White Americans’ Response to Immigration.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America115(5): 945–50. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711293115
28.
Khan-WelshHeatherReeseLaura A.ReeseTeagan J.. 2022. “How Local Contexts Matter for Local Immigrant Policies.” Urban Affairs Review59(4): 1160–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874221091496
29.
KoballHeatherKirbyJamesHartigSeth. 2022. “The Relationship Between States’ Immigrant-Related Policies and Access to Health Care Among Children of Immigrants.” Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health24(4): 834–841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-021-01282-9
30.
KubrinCharis E.BartosBradley J.. 2020. “Sanctuary Status and Crime in California: What’s the Connection?” Justice Evaluation Journal3(2): 115–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2020.1745662
LyonsChristopher J.VelezMaria B.SantoroWayne A.. 2013. “Neighborhood Immigration, Violence, and City-Level Immigrant Political Opportunities.” American Sociological Review78(4): 604–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122413491964
33.
MarrowHelen B.OkamotoDina G.GarciaMelissa J.AdemMunaTroppLinda R.. 2022. “Skin Tone and Mexicans’ Perceptions of Discrimination in New Immigrant Destinations.” Social Psychology Quarterly85(4): 374–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/01902725221128387
34.
Martinez-SchuldtRicardo D.MartinezDaniel E.. 2019. “Sanctuary Policies and City-Level Incidents of Violence, 1990 to 2010.” Justice Quarterly36(4): 567–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2017.1400577
35.
Martinez-SchuldtRicardo D.MartinezDaniel E.. 2021. “Immigrant Sanctuary Policies and Crime-Reporting Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis of Reports of Crime Victimization to Law Enforcement, 1980 to 2004.” American Sociological Review86(1): 154–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122420978406
MummoloJonathanNallClayton. 2017. “Why Partisans Do Not Sort: The Constraints on Political Segregation.” Journal of Politics79(1): 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1086/687569
38.
NicholsVanessa CruzLeBronAlana M. W.PedrazaFrancisco I.. 2018. “Policing Us Sick: The Health of Latinos in an Era of Heightened Deportations and Racialized Policing.” PS: Political Science & Politics51(2): 293–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096517002384
ParkIn Kwonvon RabenauBurkhardHongZhe. 2022. “The Effects of Sanctuary City Policies on the Local Economy: Empirical Evidence from US Counties.” International Journal of Urban Sciences27(1): 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2022.2093261
41.
RothWendy D.SolisPatricioSueChristina A.. 2022. “Beyond Money Whitening: Racialized Hierarchies and Socioeconomic Escalators in Mexico.” American Sociological Review87(5): 827–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031224221119803
42.
SimmonsWilliam PaulMenjivarCeciliaSalerno ValdezElizabeth. 2021. “The Gendered Effects of Local Immigration Enforcement: Latinas’ Social Isolation in Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, and Phoenix.” International Migration Review55(1): 108–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918320905504
43.
TellesEdwardPaschelTianna. 2014. “Who Is Black, White, or Mixed Race? How Skin Color, Status, and Nation Shape Racial Classification in Latin America.” American Journal of Sociology120(3): 864–907. https://doi.org/10.1086/679252
44.
VillarrealAndres.2010. “Stratification by Skin Color in Contemporary Mexico.” American Sociological Review75(5): 652–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122410378232
45.
WangJulia Shu-HuahKaushalNeeraj. 2019. “Health and Mental Health Effects of Local Immigration Enforcement.” International Migration Review53(4): 970–1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918318791978
46.
WrightMatthewLevyMorrisCitrinJack. 2016. “Public Attitudes Toward Immigration Policy Across the Legal/Illegal Divide: The Role of Categorical and Attribute-Based Decision-Making.” Political Behavior38(1): 229–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9311-y
47.
YoungMaria-Elena De TrinidadChenLeiSudhinarasetMaySaadiAltafKietzmanKathryn G.WallaceSteven P.. 2022. “Cumulative Experiences of Immigration Enforcement Policy and the Physical and Mental Health Outcomes of Asian and Latinx Immigrants in the United States.” International Migration Review. Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183221126726
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
