Gender-based violence (GBV) poses a significant threat to women and girls worldwide, adversely affecting their physical and mental well-being. In today's digital era, online platforms have become battlegrounds for combating abuse against women. TikTok, in particular, has emerged as a pivotal platform for raising awareness of GBV globally. Guided by Lazar's Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis framework, this study conducts a comparative analysis of GBV activist discourses in English and Arabic shared on TikTok. This study analyzes 80 TikTok videos under two trending hashtags: #stopviolenceagainstwomen and لا للعنف ضد المرأة# (No to violence against women), exploring gendered power relations and linguistic differences about GBV activism across cultural contexts. This analysis revealed two counter-discourses that challenge prevailing narratives about GBV: breaking the silence and redefining cultural norms. Through a multimodal discourse perspective, this study considers language within the context of a broader semiotic analysis of video elements, including transitions, emojis, colors, and music. Overall, the findings illuminate how gendered relations and power dynamics shape activists’ discursive strategies on social media across cultural divides.
AbbasL.ElhosaryM. (2025). Digitized narratives on #MahsaAmini: Constructing a digital transnational feminist movement on TikTok. Women’s Studies in Communication, 48(1), 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2024.2431332
2.
AbbasL.FahmyS. S. (2025). Mobilizing for justice: How Moral violation drives collective action on TikTok—insights from an online experiment. Paper presented for the Activism, Communication, and Social Justice (ACSJ) Interest Group at the ICA annual convention, Denver, CO.
3.
AbramsK. (1998). From autonomy to agency: Feminist perspectives on self-direction. William & Mary Law Review, 40(3), 805.
4.
AdinkrahM. (2011). Criminalizing rape within marriage: Perspectives of Ghanaian university students. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(6), 982–1010. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X10371800
5.
BarterC.KouluS. (2021). Digital technologies and gender-based violence—mechanisms for oppression, activism and recovery. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 5(3), 367–375. https://doi.org/10.1332/239868021X16315286472556
6.
BattistiM.KauppinenI.RudeB. (2024). Breaking the silence: The effects of online social movements on gender-based violence. European Journal of Political Economy, 85, 102598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2024.102598
7.
BaukaiteE.WalkerK.SleathE. (2024). Breaking the silence: Addressing domestic abuse in mental health settings—identification, screening, and responding. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241280092
8.
BelgrimetS.Rabab'ahG. (2021). A multimodal discourse analysis of English posters in violence awareness campaigns against women. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(2), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1102.12
9.
BrownA.KnowlesA. (2022). Holding space for future matriarchs: Digital platforms for resurging solidarity. In J. J. Fellows & L. Smith (eds)., gender, sex, and tech!: An intersectional feminist guide. Journal of Learning for Development, 11(2), 393–396.
10.
CampA. R. (2022). From experiencing abuse to seeking protection: Examining the shame of intimate partner violence. UC Irvine Law Review, 13(1), 103–154. https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/2480
11.
Carter OlsonC. (2016). #Bringbackourgirls: Digital communities supporting real-world change and influencing mainstream media agendas. Feminist Media Studies, 16(5), 772–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2016.1154887
12.
ChenG. M.PainP.BarnerB. (2018). “Hashtag feminism”: Activism or slacktivism? In Feminist approaches to media theory and research (pp. 197–218). Palgrave Macmillan.
DahalP.JoshiS. K.SwahnbergK. (2022). A qualitative study on gender inequality and gender- based violence in Nepal. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 2005–2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14389-x
15.
DawsonS. (2024). You can’t say that on TikTok : cxnsxrshxp, algorithmic (in)visibility, and the threat of representation. [Master’s thesis]. University of British Columbia. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0443761
16.
DoukiS.NacefF.BelhadjA.BouaskerA.GhachemR. (2003). Violence against women in Arab and Islamic countries. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 6(3), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-003-0170-x
17.
EinwohnerR. L.RochfordE. (2019). After the march: Using Instagram to perform and sustain the women’s march. Sociological Forum, 34(1), 1090–1111. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12542
18.
EshoT.KimaniS.NyamongoI.KimaniV.MuniuS.KigonduC.NdaviP.GuyoJ. (2017). The ‘heat’ goes away: Sexual disorders of married women with female genital mutilation/cutting in Kenya. Reproductive Health, 14(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0433-z
19.
EspositoE.SinatoraF. L. (2022). Social media discourses of feminist protest from the Arab Levant: Digital mirroring and transregional dialogue. Critical Discourse Studies, 19(5), 502–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2021.1999291
20.
FaircloughN. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.
21.
FatimatuzzahroF.AchmadZ. A. (2022). What If It Was You (#WIIWY) digital activism on TikTok to fight gender-based violence online and cyberbullying. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik, 35(4), 450–465. https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.V35I42022.450-465
22.
FontesL. A.McCloskeyK. A. (2011). Cultural issues in violence against women. In RenzettiC. M.EdlesonJ. L.BergenR. K. (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (2nd ed., pp. 151–168). Sage.
23.
ForbesG. B.CollinsworthL. L.ZhaoP.KohlmanS.LeClaireJ. (2011). Relationships among individualism–collectivism, gender, and ingroup/outgroup status, and responses to conflict: A study in China and the United States. Aggressive Behavior, 37(4), 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20395
24.
GhanimD. (2009). Gender and violence in the Middle East. Praeger.
25.
GhoshP.JawaharI. M.RaiA. (2020). Do men and women experience work engagement and job satisfaction to the same extent in collectivistic, patriarchal societies?International Journal of Manpower, 41(1), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-11-2018-0378
26.
GoffmanE. (1972). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. Penguin.
27.
GolebiewskaM. (2019). The performative aspects of metaphor: The metaphorization of silence between intentionality and conventionality. Eidos A Journal for Philosophy of Culture, 3(4), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2019.0038
28.
GraciaE. (2004). Unreported cases of domestic violence against women: Towards an epidemiology of social silence, tolerance, and inhibition. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 58(7), 536–537. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.019604
29.
HofstedeG. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
30.
HurleyZ. (2021). # Reimagining Arab women’s social media empowerment and the postdigital condition. Social Media + Society, 7(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211010169
31.
JacksonS. J.BaileyM.WellesB. F. (2020). #HashtagActivism: Networks of race and gender justice. The MIT Press.
32.
KarimullahK. (2020). Sketching women: A corpus-based approach to representations of women's agency in political internet corpora in Arabic and English. Corpora, 15(1), 21–53. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2020.0184
33.
KatzJ.StantonT. W. (2020). Experience, violence, and soundscape. Flower World-Mundo Florido: Music Archaeology of the Americas-Arqueomusicologia de las Americas, 6, 133–150.
34.
KhanR. (2018). Attitudes towards ‘honor’ violence and killings in collectivist cultures: Gender differences in Middle Eastern, North African, South Asian (MENASA) and Turkish populations. In IrelandJ. L.BirchP.IrelandC. A. (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of human aggression (pp. 216–226). Routledge.
35.
KleinR. (2013). Just words? Purpose, translation, and metaphor in framing sexual and domestic violence through language. In Framing sexual and domestic violence through language (pp. 1–19). Palgrave Macmillan.
36.
LahaS. (2022). Stigmatised as ‘daiyan’ follows ‘rape’ & ‘murder’: ‘Witch hunt’ in the tribal states of India. KDU International Journal of Criminal Justice, 1(1), 98–122. http://ir.kdu.ac.lk/handle/345/6223
37.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (2003). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
38.
LangM.LaingC.MoulesN.EstefanA. (2019). Words, camera, music, action: A methodology of digital storytelling in a health care setting. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919863241
39.
LazarM. M. (2007). Feminist critical discourse analysis: Articulating a feminist discourse praxis. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701464816
40.
LazarM. M. (2014). Feminist critical discourse analysis: Relevance for current gender and language research. In EhrlichS.MeyerhoffM.HolmesJ. (Eds.), Handbook of language, gender and sexuality (2nd ed., pp. 180–200). Wiley-Blackwell.
41.
LeeJ.AbidinC. (2023). Introduction to the Special Issue of “TikTok and Social Movements”. Social Media + Society, 9(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305123115745
42.
LiuM. (2023). Are you really smiling? Display rules for emojis and the relationship between emotion management and psychological well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1035742
43.
LomazziV. (2023). The cultural roots of violence against women: Individual and institutional gender norms in 12 countries. Social Sciences (Basel), 12(3), 117, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12030117
44.
McAllisterS.NeillG.CarrN.DwyerC. (2021). Gender, violence and cultures of silence: Young women and paramilitary violence. Journal of Youth Studies, 25(8), 1148–1163. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2021.1942807
45.
MittalS.SinghT. (2020). Gender-based violence during COVID-19 pandemic: A mini-review. Frontiers in Global Women's Health, 1(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2020.00004
NarteyM. (2022). Investigating emancipatory discourses in action: The need for an interventionist approach and an activist-scholar posture. Critical Discourse Studies, 19(5), 459–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2021.1999285
48.
NawazS.KiranA.KoserM.ShabbirM. S.ZamirA. (2022). The role of safety management to analyze the current situation of honour killing in Pakistan. Journal of Public Value and Administrative Insight, 5(2), 424–439. https://doi.org/10.31580/jpvai.v5i2.2517
49.
NealeJ. (2023). Identity erasure: Women’s experiences of living with domestic violence and abuse. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 7(2), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1332/239868021X16757857695474
50.
NewsomV. A.LengelL. (2012). Arab women, social media, and the Arab spring: Applying the framework of digital reflexivity to analyze gender and online activism. Journal of International Women's Studies, 13(5), 31–45. https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol13/iss5/5
OmenaJ. J.RabelloE. T.MintzA. G. (2020). Digital methods for hashtag engagement research. Social Media + Society, 6(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120940697
53.
OparindeK.MatshaR. M. (2021). Powerful discourse: Gender-based violence and counter- discourses in South Africa. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2021.1911035
54.
PersonE. S. (2018). Symbolism in love and sex. In Language, symbolization, and psychosis (pp. 202–218). Routledge.
55.
PrendergastM.QuinnF. (2020). Justice reframed? A comparative critical discourse analysis of twitter campaigns and print Media discourse on two high-profile sexual assault verdicts in Ireland and Spain. Journalism Practice, 15(10), 1613–1632. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1786436
56.
RidgewayC. L.CorrellS. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society, 18(4), 510–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204265269
57.
RobertsK. (Ed.). (2019). Violence against women. Greenhaven Publishing LLC.
58.
RussoN. F.PirlottA. (2006). Gender-based violence: Concepts, methods, and findings. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1087(1), 178–205. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1385.024
59.
SamantaT.TripathiN. (2024). Chromatic chronicles: Exploring the symbolism and significance of color in Anurag Kashyap’s films. Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(1), 152–172. 10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.834
60.
ScolloM. (2011). Cultural approaches to discourse analysis: A theoretical and methodological conversation with special focus on donal carbaugh's cultural discourse theory. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 6(1), 132. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2010.536550
61.
SimõesR. B.BaetaA. D.CostaB. F. (2023). Mapping feminist politics on Tik Tok during the COVID-19 pandemic: A content analysis of the hashtags# Feminismo and# Antifeminismo. Journalism and Media, 4(1), 244–257. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia4010017
62.
SmithM. E. (2003). Recovery from intimate partner violence: A difficult journey. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 24(5), 543–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840305290
63.
SriA. S.DasP.GnanapragasamS.PersaudA. (2021) COVID-19 and the violence against women and girls: ‘The shadow pandemic’. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 67(8), 971–973. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764021995556
64.
TabatadzeS. (2023). Woman against a woman? Inherited discourses to reproduce power: A gender discourse analysis of school textbooks in the context of Georgia. Education Sciences, 13(8), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13080795
65.
Van DijkT. A. (1988). Discourse analysis in society. Academic Press Inc.
XueJ.MacropolK.JiaY.ZhuT.GellesR. J. (2019). Harnessing big data for social justice: An exploration of violence against women-related conversations on Twitter. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(3), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.160
70.
YassineS. (2023). Fuck me bil ‘Arabi: The sexed Arabic sociolinguistics of queer women in Lebanon (Master's thesis) [Central European University]. Department of Gender Studies.
71.
ZeroO.Tobin-TylerE.GoldmanR. E. (2023). Barriers to disclosure of intimate partner violence among undocumented Spanish-speaking immigrants in the United States. Violence Against Women, 29(15–16), 3182–3201. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012231196055
