Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study assesses the journalistic sources contributing to international climate change op-eds in tandem with narratives arising from this prominent platform for media elites and institutions. Through a theoretical lens of ecological modernization, this paper conducted a mixed methodological analysis featuring descriptive quantitative analysis and a subsequent narrative analysis. The authors first analyzed a dataset of 305 op-eds published by the New York Times and China Daily between January 2016 and October 2019. The authors also assessed the narratively-constructed themes embedded within selected op-eds leading up to the United States’ departure from the Paris Agreement. These narratives, which featured appeals to a global ecological modernization, are (1) Humankind's shared economic destiny; (2) The new globalization and diplomacy; (3) The looming climate catastrophe. While the New York Times and China Daily featured different op-ed contributors and climate topics, both publications helped to construct larger unifying narratives about the role of climate change in global politics, economy, and society.

Keywords

climate change op-eds ecological modernization environmental media Paris agreement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

. (2009). Media, politics and climate change: Towards a new research agenda. Sociology Compass, 3(2), 166–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00188.x

Atanasova

Koteyko

(2017). Metaphors in Guardian Online and Mail Online opinion-page content on climate change: War, religion, and politics. Environmental Communication, 11(4), 452–469.

Bell

. (1994). Media (mis) communication on the science of climate change. Public Understanding Of Science, 3(3), 259–275 https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/3/3/002

Berger

Flynn

Hines

Johns

. (2001). Ecological modernization as a basis for environmental policy: Current environmental discourse and policy and the implications on environmental supply chain management. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 14(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610125074

Boussalis

Coan

T. G.

(2016). Text-mining the signals of climate change doubt. Global Environmental Change, 36, 89–100.

Boykoff

M. T

. (2007). From convergence to contention: United States mass media representations of anthropogenic climate change science. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(4), 477–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00270.x

Boykoff

M. T.

Boykoff

J. M

. (2007). Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 38(6), 1190–1204. https://doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.01.008

Boykoff

M. T

., & Roberts

J. T

. (2007). Media coverage of climate change: current trends, strengths, weaknesses. Human Development Report, 2008(3), 1–53.

Brossard

Shanahan

McComas

. (2004). Are issue-cycles culturally constructed? A comparison of French and American coverage of global climate change. Mass Communication & Society, 7(3), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327825mcs0703_6

10.

Bugeja

. (2021). Opinion: Opt-in to op-eds, a final attempt to distinguish news from opinion. Poynter . Retrieved from: https://www.poynter.org/ethics-trust/2021/opinion-opt-in-to-op-eds-a-final-attempt-to-distinguish-news-from-opinion/

11.

Burke

(1969). A grammar of motives (Vol. 177). Univ of California Press.

12.

Carvalho

. (2007). Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: Re-reading news on climate change. Public Understanding Of Science, 16(2), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506066775

13.

Chalaye

. (2022). The discursive sources of environmental progress and its limits: Biodiversity politics in France. Environmental Politics, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2034411

14.

Chen

Thorson

Lavaccare

. (2022). Convergence and divergence: The evolution of climate change frames within and across public events. International Journal of Communication, 16, 23, 107-129. 1932–8036/20220005

15.

Chetty

Devadas

Fleming

J. S

. (2015). The framing of climate change in New Zealand newspapers from June 2009 to June 2010. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 45(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.2014.996234

16.

China Daily. (2021). China Daily’s Digital Media. Retrieved from: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/static_e/digitalmedia.html

17.

Ciofalo

Traverso

. (1994). Does the op-ed page have a chance to become a public forum? Newspaper Research Journal, 15(4), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/073953299401500407

18.

Cook

B. R.

Overpeck

J. T

. (2019). Relationship-building between climate scientists and publics as an alternative to information transfer. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 10(2), e570. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.570

19.

Cook

. (2021). Understanding and countering misinformation about climate change. Research Anthology on Environmental and Societal Impacts of Climate Change, 1633–1658. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-3686-8.ch081

20.

Coppock

Ekins

Kirby

. (2018). The long-lasting effects of newspaper op-eds on public opinion. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 13(1), 59–87. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00016112

21.

Day

A. G.

Golan

(2005). Source and content diversity in op-ed pages: Assessing editorial strategies in The Washington Post and The Washington Post. Journalism Studies, 6(1), 61–71.

22.

Elsasser

S. W.

Dunlap

R. E

. (2013). Leading voices in the denier choir: Conservative columnists’ dismissal of global warming and denigration of climate science. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(6), 754–776. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212469800

23.

Entman

R. M

. (2008). Theorizing mediated public diplomacy: The US case. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(2), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208314657

24.

Fernández-Reyes

Piñuel Raigada

J. L.

Vicente-Mariño

. (2015). Media coverage of climate change and global warming en El País, El Mundo y La Vanguardia. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 70, 122–140.

25.

Fidler

., Chen

T-P

Wei

. (2017). China’s Xi Jinping Seizes Role as Leader on Globalization. Wall Street Journal . Retrieved from: https://www.wsj.com/articles/chinas-xi-jinping-defends-globalization-1484654899

26.

Fischer

(2017). Climate crisis and the democratic prospect: participatory governance in sustainable communities. Oxford University Press.

27.

Fisher

D. R.

Freudenburg

W. R

. (2001). Ecological modernization and its critics: Assessing the past and looking toward the future. Society & Natural Resources, 14(8), 701–709. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920152524891

28.

Fisher

W. R.

(2021). Human communication as narration: Toward a philosophy of reason, value, and action. Univ of South Carolina Press.

29.

Foss

S. K.

Foss

K. A.

Trapp

(2014). Contemporary perspectives on rhetoric. Waveland Press.

30.

Foster

J. B

. (2012). The planetary rift and the new human exemptionalism: A political-economic critique of ecological modernization theory. Organization & Environment, 25(3), 211–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026612459964

31.

Golan

G. J.

Carroll

T. R

. (2012). The op-ed as a strategic tool of public diplomacy: Framing of the 2011 Egyptian revolution. Public Relations Review, 38(4), 630–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.06.005

32.

Greenberg

Knight

Westersund

. (2011). Spinning climate change: Corporate and NGO public relations strategies in Canada and the United States. International Communication Gazette, 73(1–2), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048510386742

33.

Grissa

(2016, April). What makes opinion leaders share brand content on professional networking sites (eg LinkedIn, viadeo, Xing, SkilledAfricans…). In 2016 International conference on digital economy (ICDEc) (pp. 8–15). IEEE.

34.

Hart

R. P.

(1990). Modern rhetorical criticism. Scott Foresman & Company.

35.

Hoffman

A. J

. (2011). Talking past each other? Cultural framing of skeptical and convinced logics in the climate change debate. Organization & Environment, 24(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026611404336

36.

Jacobs

R. N.

Townsley

(2011). The space of opinion: Media intellectuals and the public sphere. Oxford University Press.

37.

Kingsbury

. (2021). Why The New York Times is retiring the term ‘op-ed’. New York Times . Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/26/opinion/nyt-opinion-oped-redesign.html

38.

Kowalchuk

McLaughlin

. (2009). Mapping the social space of opinion: Public sociology and the op-ed in Canada. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 34(3), 697–728. https://doi.org/10.29173/cjs6310

39.

Logan

. (2011). The white leader prototype: A critical analysis of race in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 23(4), 442–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2011.605974

40.

Masumian

A. E

. (2015). Medium.com as a contender in the participatory web. (Doctoral dissertation).

41.

McKewon

. (2012). Talking points ammo: The use of neoliberal think tank fantasy themes to delegitimize scientific knowledge of climate change in Australian newspapers. Journalism Studies, 13(2), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2011.646403

42.

Mimaroglu

. (2015). How the blog post op-ed is changing news. Convince&Convert . Retrieved from: https://www.convinceandconvert.com/digital-marketing/blog-post-op-ed/

43.

Moscato

. (2018). The polar silk road in the popular press: Global Media framing of China’s 2018 Arctic policy white paper. Arctic Yearbook, 2018, 475.

44.

Napolitano

(2013). Development, sustainability and international politics. In Transgovernance (pp. 163–211). Berlin: Springer.

45.

Nisbet

M. C

. (2019). The trouble with climate emergency journalism. Issues in Science and Technology, 35(4), 23–26.

46.

Nuccitelli

. (2017). Americans are confused on climate, but support cutting carbon pollution. The Guardian . Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2017/mar/06/americans-are-confused-on-climate-but-support-cutting-carbon-pollution

47.

Oreskes

. (2004). The scientific consensus on climate change. Science (New York, N.Y.), 306(5702), 1686–1686. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103618

48.

Paris Agreement. (2014). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved from: http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9485.php

49.

Pepermans

Maeseele

. (2014). Democratic debate and mediated discourses on climate change: From consensus to de/politicization. Environmental Communication, 8(2), 216–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.906482

50.

Pinkston. (2021). The state of the op-ed. Retrieved from: https://pinkston.co/state-of-the-op-ed

51.

Rosen

(1993). Community Connectedness Passwords for Public Journalism: how to create journalism that listens to citizens and reinvigorates public life (No. 3) . Poynter Institute for Media Studies.

52.

Smith

G. L.

Heath

R. L

. (1990). Moral appeals in Mobil oil’s op-ed campaign. Public Relations Review, 16(4), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(05)80051-7

53.

Song

. (2004). Freelance op-ed pieces show newspapers’ political slant. Newspaper Research Journal, 25(3), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/073953290402500304

54.

Strauß

. (2021). Framing Sustainable Finance: A Critical Analysis of Op-eds in the Financial Times. International Journal of Business Communication, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884211025982

55.

Taddicken

. (2013). Climate change from the user’s perspective: The impact of mass media and internet use and individual and moderating variables on knowledge and attitudes. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 25(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000080

56.

Tameez

. (2020). For the first time, The New York Times’ digital subscriptions generate more revenue than its print ones. Niemen Lab . Retrieved from: https://www.niemanlab.org/2020/11/for-the-first-time-the-new-york-times-digital-subscriptions-generate-more-revenue-than-its-print-ones/

57.

The Economist. (2017). China is spending billions to make the world love it. Retrieved from: http://www.economist.com/news/china/21719508-can-money-buy-sort-thing-china-spending-billions-make-world-love-it

58.

Whitmarsh

. (2011). Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 690–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.016

59.

Zamith

Pinto

Villar

M. E

. (2013). Constructing climate change in the americas: An analysis of news coverage in US and south American newspapers. Science Communication, 35(3), 334–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012457470

Global Narratives of Ecological Modernization: The Construction of Climate Change op-eds in China Daily and the New York Times

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References