Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

After the January 6th, 2021, riots at the U.S. Capitol, it seemed clear that the public sphere in the U.S. was being challenged by political extremists. Yet, existing public sphere normative theories provide unsatisfying tools for explaining why the riots occurred. Participants in the contemporary U.S. public sphere do not seem to recognize the legitimacy of their political opponents, and there is an increasing turn toward raw assertion instead of rational deliberation. In this essay, we discuss these shortcomings, focusing on how internet-mediated communication makes basic assumptions about legitimacy and rationality untenable. We settle on the concept of an “assertive turn” in the public sphere and analyze how anti-rationalism is becoming dominant in political discourse. We then argue for a scholarly reckoning with the social reality of 21st century U.S. politics—mainly that there are significant gaps in normative theory when it comes to addressing the assertive turn in the U.S. public sphere.

Keywords

public sphere narrative theory Habermas political discourse postmodernism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arnett

R. C.

Fritz

J. M. H.

Bell

L. M.

(2008). Communication ethics literacy. Sage.

Asen

(2017). Neoliberalism, the public sphere, and a public good. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 103(4), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2017.1360507.

Batorski

Grzywińska

(2018). Three dimensions of the public sphere on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society, 21(3), 356–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2017.1281329.

Budarick

(2020). Agonistic pluralism and journalism: De-centering dominant journalistic norms. Communication Theory, 30(2), 188–204. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz034

Bump

(2021). Half of Republicans incorrectly think there’s evidence Biden didn’t win legitimately. The Washington Post, April 30. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/04/30/half-republicans-incorrectly-think-theres-evidence-biden-didnt-win-legitimately/

Cammaerts

(2009). Radical pluralism and free speech in online public spaces. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 12(6), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877909342479.

Cosentino

(2020). Social media and the post-truth world order. Palgrave Pivot.

Dahlberg

(2005). The Habermasian public sphere: Taking difference seriously. Theory and Society, 34(2), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-005-0155-z.

Davis

(2020). The online anti-public sphere. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 136754942090279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549420902799.

10.

DeBonis

Barr

(2021). Rewriting January 6th: Republicans and conservatives push fictional accounts of Capitol riot—The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/republicans-riot-false-accounts/2021/02/28/9230e3b6-784c-11eb-9537-496158cc5fd9_story.html

11.

Dewey

(1927). The public and its problems. Swallow Press.

12.

Fisher

W. R.

(1984). Narration as a human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument. Communications Monographs, 51(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390180

13.

Foucault

(2010). The birth of biopolitics. Picador.

14.

Fraser

(1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, (25/26), 56–80. https://www.jstor.org/stable/466240 https://doi.org/10.2307/466240

15.

Goldwasser

(2021). Well before the Jan. 6 insurrection, Oath Keepers trafficked in violence and conspiracy theories. Southern Poverty Law Center, Feb. 12. https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2021/02/12/well-jan-6-insurrection-oath-keepers-trafficked-violence-and-conspiracy-theories

16.

Graham

D. A.

(2021). We’re just finding out how bad the riot really was. The Atlantic, Apr. 28. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/01/it-was-much-worse-it-looked/617693/

17.

Habermas

(2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16(4), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x.

18.

Habermas

(2015). The structural transformation of the public sphere. John Wiley & Sons.

19.

Healy

(2021). These are the five people who died in the Capitol Riot. The New York Times, Jan. 11. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/11/us/who-died-in-capitol-building-attack.html

20.

Hennessy-Fiske

(2021). “Second revolution begins”: Armed right-wing groups celebrate Capitol attack. The Los Angeles Times, Jan 6. https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2021-01-06/the-second-revolution-begins-today-armed-right-wing-groups-celebrate-attack-on-capitol

21.

Higgins

(2021). Not Getting Vaccinated to Own Your Fellow Libs. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/09/what-do-lefty-anti-vaxxers-do-now/620092/

22.

Howarth

D. R.

(2008). Ethos, agonism and populism: William Connolly and the case for radical democracy. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 10(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856x.2007.00308.x.

23.

Kidder

D. L.

Lankau

M. J.

Chrobot-Mason

Mollica

K. A.

Friedman

R. A.

(2004). Backlash toward diversity initiatives: Examining the impact of diversity program justification, personal and group outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15(1), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022908/full/html.

24.

Knight

(2019). Future foretold: A new America in 2040. Axios, May 21. https://www.axios.com/being-30-in-2040-future-new-world-us-diversity-2d3ba6db-3345-4ec4-97a8-9282fe1cee67.html

25.

Korstenbroek

(2021). Rethinking the public sphere in an age of radical-right populism: A case for building an empathetic public sphere. Communication Theory, 32(1), 68–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtab005.

26.

Kreuder-Sonnen

(2018). An authoritarian turn in Europe and European Studies. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(3), 452–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1411383.

27.

Martin

(Ed.). (2013). Chantal Mouffe: Hegemony, radical democracy, and the political. Routledge.

28.

Mathias

(2021). They were not tourists: The radicals at the heart of the Capitol Riot. Huffington Post, July 4. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/capitol-insurrection-six-month-anniversary_n_60e07bf3e4b03f72964accc0

29.

McKie

Xifra

(2015). “All stories are true; some stories actually happened”: Fact-finding versus storyselling, history, and PR history. In Paper presented at the international history public relations conference, July 8–9, Bournemouth, UK.

30.

McSwiney

(2021). Why were the Capitol rioters so angry? Because they’re scared of losing grip on their perverse idea of democracy. The Conversation, January 7. https://theconversation.com/why-were-the-capitol-rioters-so-angry-because-theyre-scared-of-losing-grip-on-their-perverse-idea-of-democracy-152812

31.

Miller

D. T.

Ratner

R. K.

(1998). The disparity between the actual and assumed power of self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.53.

32.

Minakov

(2020). Eastern Europe’s authoritarian belt in crisis. Wilson Center, Oct. 6. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/eastern-europes-authoritarian-belt-crisis

33.

Mouffe

(1993). The return of the political. Phronesis.

34.

Mouffe

(1999). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism. Social Research, 66(3), 270–278. https://jstor.org/stable/40971349

35.

Mouffe

(2005). On the political. Routledge.

36.

Murdock

(2021). Tucker Carlson continues to promote white supremacist “great replacement” conspiracy. Huffington Post, Sept. 23. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/tucker-carlson-continues-to-promote-white-supremacist-great-replacement-conspiracy_n_614cca1ce4b03dd7280888e0

37.

Mutz

D. C.

(2018). Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), E4330–E4339. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718155115.

38.

Narvaez

(2020). The psychology of domestic terrorists: Eliminationism. Psychology Today, Oct. 18. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/moral-landscapes/202010/the-psychology-domestic-terrorists-eliminationism

39.

Neiwert

D. A.

(2009). The eliminationists. Routledge.

40.

Oliphant

Kahn

(2021). Half of Republicans believe false accounts of deadly U.S. Capitol riot-Reuters/Ipsos poll. Reuters, Apr. 30. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-politics-disinformation/half-of-republicans-believe-false-accounts-of-deadly-u-s-capitol-riot-reuters-ipsos-poll-idUSKBN2BS0RZ

41.

Pape

Ruby

(2021). The Capitol rioters aren’t like other extremists. The Atlantic, Feb. 2. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/02/the-capitol-rioters-arent-like-other-extremists/617895/

42.

Phelan

(2019). Neoliberalism, the far right, and the disparaging of “social justice warriors”. Communication, Culture and Critique, 12(4), 455–475. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcz040.

43.

Rifkin

(2021). David Finn, co-founder of a public relations power, dies at 100. New York Times, Oct. 19. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/19/business/david-finn-dead.html

44.

Roose

(2021). What is QAnon, the viral pro-Trump conspiracy theory? The New York Times, Sept. 3. https://www.nytimes.com/article/what-is-qanon.html

45.

Schmitt

(1932/1976). The concept of the political. Translated by G. Schwab. Rutgers University Press.

46.

Schmitt

(1926/1985). The crisis of parliamentary democracy. Translated by E. Kennedy. The MIT Press.

47.

Sommerfeldt

(2021). Pro-Trump rioters smeared poop in U.S. Capitol hallways during belligerent attack. New York Daily News, Jan. 7. https://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ny-trump-capitol-riot-poopers-20210107-prlsqytyabgdhnexushotl4nam-story.html

48.

Sorial

Mackenzie

(2011). The limits of the public sphere: The advocacy of violence. Critical Horizons, 12(2), 165–188. https://doi.org/10.1558/crit.v12i2.165.

49.

St. John

(2015). The top executive on undercover boss. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 39(3), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859915577695.

50.

Strömbäck

(2008). Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(3), 228–246. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1940161208319097.

51.

Suiter

(2016). Post-truth politics. Political Insight, 7(3), 25–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041905816680417.

52.

Tormey

Townshend

(2006). Key thinkers from critical theory to post-Marxism. Sage.

53.

Vegetti

Littvay

(2021). Belief in conspiracy theories and attitudes toward political violence. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2021.17.

54.

Wahl-Jorgensen

(2019). Questioning the ideal of the public sphere: The emotional turn. Social Media+Society, 5(3), 205630511985217. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119852175.

55.

Wenman

(2003b). Agonistic democracy: Constituent power in the era of globalisation. Cambridge University Press.

56.

Wenman

(2003a). “Agonistic pluralism” and three archetypal forms of politics. Contemporary Political Theory, 2, 165–186. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300091.

57.

Wittgenstein

(2001). Philosophical investigations. Wiley-Blackwell.

Facts Do Care about Your Feelings: The “Assertive Turn” in Emergent Attributes of the Contemporary U.S. Public Sphere

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References