After protestors clashed in Charlottesville, Virginia over the planned removal of a statue of a Confederate general, President Trump refused to condemn white nationalists. Over the following days, numerous news stories were written about the protests, allowing the public to discuss white nationalism through online comments. Using theories on ideology, discourse, and framing, this study considers how white nationalist discourse emerged in those comments. The findings show broad support for white nationalism, including complaints about threats to white culture, reinterpretation of American history to support white nationalist ideas, and rejection of the idea that marginalized people face oppression. However, the study also shows a burgeoning force of critical commenters struggling to challenge white nationalism’s emergence in public spaces.
BoydD. (2011). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In PapacharissiZ. (Ed.) A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58).
Routledge.
DuffyM. E. (2003).
Web of hate: A fantasy theme analysis of the rhetorical vision of hate groups online. Journal of Communication Inquiry,
27(3), 291–312.
EngesserS.ErnstN.EsserF.BüchelF. (2017).
Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society,
20(8), 1109–1126.
18.
EntmanR. (1993).
Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication,
43(4), 51–58.
19.
EntmanR. (2007).
Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication,
57(1), 163–173.
20.
FeaginJ. (2020). The white racial frame: Centuries of racial framing and counter-framing (3rd ed.).
Routledge.
21.
FeshamiK. A. (2020). “
We act as one lest we perish alone”: A case study in mediated white nationalist activism. Communication Culture & Critique,
14(1), 52–69.
22.
FürsichE. (2009).
Defense of textual analysis. Journalism Studies,
10(2), 238–252.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1968). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
25.
HallS. (1985).
Signification, representation, ideology: Althusser and the post-structuralist debates. Critical Studies in Mass Communication,
2(2), 91–114.
26.
HallS. (1996). The west and the rest: Discourse and power. In HallS.HeldD.HubertD., andThompsonK. (Eds.) Modernity: An introduction to modern societies.
Blackwell.
27.
HartzellS. L. (2018).
Alt-White: Conceptualizing the “alt-right” as a rhetorical bridge between white nationalism and mainstream public discourse. Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric,
8(1/2), 6–25.
28.
HartzellS. L. (2020).
Whiteness feels good here: Interrogating white nationalist rhetoric on Stormfront. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies,
17(2), 129–148.
29.
HawleyG. (2017). Making sense of the alt-right. Columbia University Press.
KrämerB. (2017).
Populist online practices: The function of the internet in right-wing populism. Information, Communication & Society,
20(9), 1293–1309.
NorrisP.InglehartR. (2016).
Trump, Brexit and the rise of populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash. Harvard JFK School of Government Faculty Working Paper Series, August, 1–52.
49.
PanZ.KosickiG. (2001). Framing as a strategic action in public deliberation. In ReeseS.GandyO.GrantA. (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 35–67).
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
RidgewayA. (2020).
Affective economies of white nationalism: Tracing the Right-Wing populist rhetoric of Brexit and trump 2016. Kairos: A Journal of Critical Symposium,
5(1), 9–31.
SnowD. A.McAdamD. (2000). Identity work processes in the context of social movements: Clarifying the identity/movement nexus. In StrykerS.OwensT. J.WhiteR. W. (Eds.), Self, identity, and social movements (pp. 41–67).
University of Minnesota Press.
SpeakmanB.FunkM. (2020). News, nationalism, and hegemony: The formation of consistent issue framing throughout the U.S. political right. Mass Communication and Society.
63.
SteinfeldtJ. A.FoltzB. D.KaladowJ. K.CarlsonT. N.PaganoL. A.Jr.BentonE.SteinfeldtM. C. (2010).
Racism in the electronic age: Role of online forums in expressing racial attitudes about American Indians. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology,
6(3), 362–371.
VanderHaagenS. C. (2019).
(Mis)quoting king: Commemorative stewardship and ethos in the controversy over the martin Luther King Jr. Memorial. Argumentation and Advocacy,
55(2), 91–114.
71.
WalgraveS.De SwertS. (2004).
The making of the (issues of the) Vlaams Blok. Political Communication,
21(4), 479–500.
