Concepts of nature and the ‘natural’ order of things form a central anchor in public debate and controversy about developments in genetic research and in human, animal and plant biotechnology. ‘Nature’, as Raymond Williams observed, ‘is perhaps the most complex word in the language’, and it is precisely from this complexity that its discursive and ideological power is derived. While it is widely accepted that ‘nature' is a social construct, it is perhaps its characteristic appearance of not being so that makes it a powerful ideological anchor. This article examines how nature and appeals to what is ‘natural’ are invoked in media discourse on genetics. Starting with a review of research on the representation of genetics and on ‘nature’ in a range of public discourses and media genres, the article explores the changing uses of nature in British newspaper coverage of genetics and biotechnology from 1986/7 to 2002/3.
Altimore, M. (1982) ‘The Social Construction of a Scientific Controversy: Comments on Press Coverage of the Recombinant DNA Debate’ , Science, Technology and Human Values7(4): 24-31 .
2.
Barthes, R. (1972) Mythologies. London: Jonathan Cape .
3.
Bauer, M. W. (2002) ‘Controversial Medical and Agri-food Biotechnology: A Cultivation Analysis’ , Public Understanding of Science11(2): 93-111 .
4.
Bauer, M. , J. Durant and G. Gaskell (eds) (1999) Biotechnology in the Public Sphere: A European Sourcebook. London: The Science Museum .
5.
Bouse, D. (2000) Wildlife Films. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press .
6.
Budd, M. , S. Craig and C. Steinman (1999) Consuming Environments: Television and Commercial Culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press .
7.
Condit, C. M. , P. J. Achter , I. Lauer and E. Sefcovic (2002a) ‘The Changing Meanings of “Mutation”: A Contextualized Study of Public Discourse’ , Human Mutation19(1): 69-75 .
8.
Condit, C. M. , B. R. Bates , R. Galloway , S. Brown Givens , C. K. Haynie , J. W. Jordan , G. W. Stables and H. M. West (2002b) ‘Recipes or Blueprints for our Genes? How Contexts Selectively Activate the Multiple Meanings of Metaphors’ , Quarterly Journal of Speech88(3): 303-325 .
9.
Crichton, M. (1991) Jurassic Park. London: Arrow Books .
10.
Cronon, W. (ed.) (1995) Uncommon Ground: Toward Reinventing Nature. New York: Norton .
11.
Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) (2003) GM Nation? The Findings of the Public Debate. URL (consulted August 2004): http://www.gmnation.org.uk/docs/gmnation_finalreport.pdf
12.
Durant, J. , A. Hansen and M. Bauer (1996) ‘Public Understanding of the New Genetics’, pp. 235-248 in M. Marteau and J. Richards (eds) The Troubled Helix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
13.
Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and Power. London: Longman .
14.
Fairclough, N. (1995) Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold .
15.
Gamson, W. A. and A. Modigliani (1989) ‘Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach’ , American Journal of Sociology95(1): 1-37 .
16.
Goodell, R. (1986) ‘How to Kill a Controversy: The Case of Recombinant DNA’, in S. M. Friedman , S. Dunwoody and C. L. Rogers (eds) Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News. New York: The Free Press .
17.
Goodfield, J. (1981) Reflections on Science and the Media. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science .
18.
Hansen, A. (1994) ‘Journalistic Practices and Science Reporting in the British Press’ , Public Understanding of Science3(2): 111-134 .
19.
Hansen, A. (2002) ‘Discourses of Nature in Advertising’ , Communications27: 499-511 .
20.
Harvey, D. (1996) Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. London: Blackwell .
21.
Hellsten, I. (2003) ‘Promises of a Healthier Future’ , Nordicom Review24(1): 33-40 .
22.
Kress, G. (1997) ‘Language in the Media’, pp. 13-43 in Unit 49 of the MA Mass Communications (By Distance Learning). Centre for Mass Communication Research, University of Leicester .
23.
Martins, I. and J. Ogborn (1997) ‘Metaphorical Reasoning about Genetics’ , International Journal of Science Education19(1): 47-63 .
24.
Mitman, G. (1999) Reel Nature: America’s Romance with Wildlife on Film. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
25.
Nelkin, D. (1987) Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology. New York: W.H. Freeman .
26.
Nelkin, D. (1995) Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology, 2nd revised edn.New York: W.H. Freeman .
27.
Nelkin, D. and M. S. Lindee (1995) The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon. New York: W.H. Freeman .
28.
Nisbet, M. C. and B. V. Lewenstein (2002) ‘Biotechnology and the American Media - The Policy Process and the Elite Press, 1970 to 1999’ , Science Communication23(4): 359-391 .
29.
Nordgren, A. (2003) ‘Metaphors in Behavioral Genetics’ , Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics24(1): 59-77 .
30.
Petersen, A. (2001) ‘Biofantasies: Genetics and Medicine in the Print News Media’ , Social Science & Medicine52(8): 1255-1268 .
31.
Pfund, N. and L. Hofstadter (1981) ‘Biomedical Innovation and the Press’ , Journal of Communication31(2): 138-154 .
32.
Rutherford, P. (1994) The New Icons? The Art of Television Advertising. Toronto, London: Toronto University Press .
33.
Salisbury, J. G. T. (2001) ‘Using Neural Networks to Assess Corporate Image’, pp. 65-85 in M. D. West (ed.) Applications of Computer Content Analysis. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing .
34.
Schelde, P. (1993) Androids, Humanoids and Other Science Fiction Monsters: Science and Soul in Science Fiction Films. New York: New York University Press .
35.
Shaw, A. (2002) ‘“It Just Goes against the Grain”: Public Understandings of Genetically Modified (GM) Food in the UK’ , Public Understanding of Science11(3): 273-291 .
36.
Soper, K. (1995) What is Nature?Oxford: Blackwell .
37.
Stubbs, M. (1996) Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer Assisted Studies of Language and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell .
38.
Sutton, P. (1999) ‘Genetics and the Future of Nature Politics’ , Sociological Research Online4(3): U251-U257 . URL (consulted May 2006): http://www.socresonline.org.uk/4/3/sutton.html
39.
Ten Eyck, T. A. and M. Williment (2003) ‘The National Media and Things Genetic - Coverage in the New York Times (1971-2001) and the Washington Post (1977-2001)’ , Science Communication25(2): 129-152 .
40.
Turney, J. (1998) Frankenstein’s Footsteps: Science, Genetics and Popular Culture. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press .
41.
Van Dijck, J. (1998) Imagenation: Popular Images of Genetics. London: Macmillan .
42.
Wall, G. (1999) ‘Science, Nature, and The Nature of Things: An Instance of Canadian Environmental Discourse, 1960-1994’ , Canadian Journal of Sociology-Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie24(1): 53-85 .
43.
Watt, R. J. C. (2002) Concordance, Version 3.0. Dundee: RJCW . URL: http://www.rjcw.freeserve.co.uk/
44.
Weart, S. R. (1988) Nuclear Fear: A History of Images. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
45.
Williams, R. (1973) The Country and the City. London: Chatto and Windus .
46.
Williams, R. (1983) Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. London: Flamingo/Fontana .
47.
Williamson, J. (1978) Decoding Advertisements: Ideology and Meaning in Advertising. London: Marion Boyars .
