Animal liberation activists’ visual output invites reflection on the relationships our society has with other animals who live, suffer and die as objects of human exploitation. This paper presents the results of 60 interviews with vegan animal liberation activists in Sweden, Denmark and Spain. The main goal of this research was to consider the effectiveness of different visuals and audiovisuals (particularly violent images producing moral shock) in 1) promoting change in speciesist attitudes (the adoption of veganism), 2) promoting action against speciesism (involvement in activism) and 3) sustaining both veganism and activism in the long term. A second goal was to examine how activists used visual materials in their own efforts to promote anti-speciesism. The third goal was to validate the author’s classification of violent images of farmed exploited animals. The findings suggest that exposure to moral shock was decisive in the adoption of veganism and involvement in activism in most cases. They also show that activists use these visuals to sustain their moral values and practices over time.
AaltolaE. (2014).
Animal suffering: Representations and the act of looking. Anthrozoös,
27(1), 19–31.
2.
AaltolaE. (2018). Varieties of empathy. Moral psychology and animal ethics.
Rowman & Littlefield International.
3.
AhmedS. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion.
Routledge.
4.
CormanL. (2017). Ideological monkey wrenching: nonhuman animal politics beyond suffering. In NibertDavid (Ed.) Animal oppression and capitalism. Volume II: The oppressive and destructive role of capitalism (pp. 252–269).
Praeger.
5.
CroninJ. K.KramerL. A. (2018).
Challenging the iconography of oppression in marketing: confronting speciesism through art and visual culture. Journal of Animal Ethics,
8(1), 80–92.
6.
Díaz CarmonaE. (2012).
Perfil del vegano/a activista de liberación animal en España [Profile of the vegan animal rights activist in Spain]. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas (Reis),
139, 175–188.
7.
DoebelS.GabrielS., & The Humane League. (2015). Report: Which farm animal photos are most likely to inspire people to eat vegan?
Humane League Labs.
8.
DonovanJ.AdamsC. J. (2007). (Eds.). The feminist care tradition in animal ethics.
Columbia University Press.
9.
EinwohnerR. L. (1999). Gender, class, and social movement outcomes: Identity and effectiveness in two animal rights campaigns. Gender and Society,
13(1), 56–76.
10.
FernándezL. (2018). Hacia mundos más animales. Una crítica al binarismo ontológico desde los cuerpos no humanos [Towards more animal worlds. A critique to ontological binarism from nonhuman bodies]. Ochodoscuatro Ediciones.
11.
FoleyD.ValenzuelaA. (2012). Etnografía crítica. La política de colaboración [Critical ethnography. The politics of collaboration]. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Coord.) Paradigmas y perspectivas en disputa [Paradigms and perspectives in dispute] (pp. 79–110).Gedisa.
12.
FrancioneG. (2000). Introduction to animal rights: Your child or the dog?
Temple University Press.
13.
FreemanC. P.TullochS. (2013). Was blind but now I see: Animal liberation documentaries’ deconstruction of barriers to witnessing injustice. In PickA.NarrawayG. (Eds.), Screening nature: Cinema beyond the human (pp. 110–126).
Berghahn Books.
14.
GaarderE. (2011).
Where the boys aren’t: The predominance of women in animal rights activism. Feminist Formations,
23(2), 54–76.
15.
GlennC. B. (2004).
Constructing consumables and consent: A critical analysis of factory farm industry discourse. Journal of Communication Inquiry,
28(1), 63–81.
16.
GreenwoodD. (2000).
De la observación a la investigación-acción participativa [From observation to participatory research-action]. Revista de Antropología Social,
9, 27–49.
17.
HerzogH.GoldenL. (2009).
Moral emotions and social activism: The case of animal rights. Journal of Social Issues,
65(3), 485–498.
18.
HribalJ. (2010). Fear of the animal planet. The hidden history of animal resistance.
AK Press.
19.
JacobssonK.LindblomJ. (2013).
Emotion work in animal rights activism: A moral-sociological perspective. Acta Sociologica,
56(1), 55–68.
20.
JasperJ. M.PoulsenJ. D. (1995).
Recruiting strangers and friends: Moral shocks and social networks in animal rights and anti-nuclear protests. Social Problems,
42(4), 493–512.
21.
JenniK. (2005).
The power of the visual. Animal Liberation Philosophy and Policy Journal,
3(1), 1–21.
22.
jonesP. (2014). The oxen at the intersection: A collision.
Lantern Books.
23.
KeanH. (1998). Animal rights. Political and social change in Britain since 1800. Reaktion Books.
24.
KhazaalN. Y.AlmironN. (2016).
An angry cow is not a good eating experience. Journalism Studies,
17(3), 374–391.
25.
KrahéB.MöllerI.HuesmannL. R.KirwilL.FelberJ.BergerA. (2011).
Desensitization to media violence: Links with habitual media violence exposure, aggressive cognitions, and aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
100(4), 630–646.
26.
LinnéT. (2016).
Cows on Facebook and Instagram: Interspecies intimacy in the social media spaces of the Swedish Dairy Industry. Television & New Media,
17(8), 719–733.
27.
MartinT. A. (2014).
“This image cannot be displayed”: Critical visual pedagogy and images from factory farms. Journal for Critical Animal Studies,
12(4), 79–104.
28.
MikaN. (2006).
Framing the issue: Religion, secular ethics and the case of animal rights mobilization. Social Forces,
85(2), 915–941.
29.
NibertD. A. (2002). Animal rights, human rights. Entanglements of oppression and liberation.
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
30.
PachiratT. (2011). Every twelve seconds. Industrialized slaughter and the politics of sight.
Yale University Press.
31.
ReganT. (1983). The case for animal rights.
University of California Press.
32.
Sifuentes GarcíaP. A.Paneque GálvezJ., (2019).
Eficacia de materiales audiovisuales sobre explotación animal para motivar cambios en el consumo alimentario de estudiantes mexicanos [Efficacy of audiovisual materials on animal exploitation to motivate changes in food consumption of Mexican students]. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Críticos Animales,
6(1), 277–307.
33.
SingerP. (1990). Animal liberation: A new ethics for our treatment of animals.
Random House. (Original work published 1975).
34.
TaylorN. (2016). Suffering is not enough: media depictions of violence to other animals and social change. In N. Almiron, M. Cole, & C. P. Freeman (Eds.), Critical animal and media studies: Communication for nonhuman animal advocacy (pp. 42–55). Routledge.
35.
WisneskiD. C.SkitkaL. J. (2017).
Moralization through moral shock: Exploring emotional antecedents to moral conviction. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,
43(2), 139–150.
