This article reports the results of a qualitative media framing analysis of news coverage about #MeToo in four national contexts: the United States, Japan, Australia, and India. Comparing media coverage of a woman who became associated with #MeToo in each country reveals four media frames: brave silence breaker, stoic victim of an unjust system, recovered or reluctant hero, and hysterical slut. By identifying these frames, and their cultural variations, we add to understanding of #MeToo as an international social movement that has crossed national and cultural barriers.
AbishekP. (2018).
A critical analysis of status of women in India. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics,
120(5), 4853–4874.
2.
ArulselvanS. (2016).
Role of media in making public policy on India’s criminal justice system: A study of news reporting on actor Salman Khan’s acquittal in a murder case. Global Media Journal,
14(26), 1–7. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1882389553?accountid=7098
3.
BrescollV. L.UhlmannE. L. (2008).
Can an angry woman get ahead? Status conferral, gender, and expression of emotion in the workplace.Psychological Science,
19, 268–275.
ChenarestanSoflaT. H.KaramiM. (2016).
Trend and tendencies of students toward modernity (A sociological study of post-graduate students of Osmania University, Hyderabad, India).International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies,
5(3), 468–479.
6.
DahlströmS. M.SundströmÅ. (2018). Female self-defense, male self-responsibility: A qualitative text analysis of how the MeToo movement was advanced by Dagens Nyheter (Student thesis). Uppsala University, Sweden. Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1213012/FULLTEXT01.pdf
7.
DeVreeseC.BoomgaardenH. (2003).
Valenced news frames and public support for the EU.Communications,
28(4), 361–381.
8.
EntmanR. M. (1993).
Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm.Journal of Communication,
43(4), 51–58.
9.
FalkR. (2016).
Rethinking the Arab Spring: Uprisings, counterrevolution, chaos and global reverberations.Third World Quarterly,
37(12), 2322–2334.
10.
Fowler, S. (2017, February 19). Reflecting on one very, very strange year at Uber [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.susanjfowler.com/blog/2017/2/19/reflecting-on-one-very-strange-year-at-uber
11.
FungT. K.ScheufeleD. A. (2014). Social norms, spirals of silence and framing theory: An argument for considering cross-cultural differences in media effects research. In DonsbachW.SalmonC.TsfatiY. (Eds.), The spiral of silence: New perspectives on communication and public opinion (pp. 131--144).
New York, NY:
Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
12.
GerbaudoP.TreréE. (2015).
In search of the ‘we’ of social media activism: Introduction to the special issue on social media and protest identities.Information, Communication & Society,
18(8), 865–871.
GillR.OrgadS. (2018).
The shifting terrain of sex and power: From the ‘sexualization of culture’ to #MeToo.Sexualities,
21(8), 1313–1324.
15.
HofstedeG. (1993).
Cultural constraints in management theories.Academy of Management Perspectives,
7(1), 81–94. doi:10.5465/ame.1993.9409142061
16.
HofstedeG.HofstedeG. J.MinkovM. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.).
New York, NY:
McGraw-Hill.
17.
JacksonS. J.BanaszczykS. (2016).
Digital standpoints: Debating gendered violence and racial exclusions in the feminist counterpublic.Journal of Communication Inquiry,
40, 391–407.
18.
JakobsenC. (2018). Time’s Up Now & #MeToo Denmark (Unpublished manuscript). Aalborg University, Denmark.
JohanssonM.JohanssonK.AnderssonE. (2018).
#MeToo in the Swedish forest sector: Testimonies from harassed women on sexualised forms of male control. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research,
33(5), 419–425.
KunstJ. R.BaileyA.PrendergastC.GundersenA. (2018).
Sexism, rape myths and feminist identification explain gender differences in attitudes toward the# metoo social media campaign in two countries.Media Psychology, 1–26. doi:10.1080/15213269.2018.1532300
MendesK.RingroseJ.KellerJ. (2018).
#MeToo and the promise and pitfalls of challenging rape culture through digital feminist activism. European Journal of Women’s Studies,
25, 236–246.
29.
MilanS. (2015).
From social movements to cloud protesting: The evolution of collective identity.Information, Communication & Society,
18(8), 887–900. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043135
ParkH.LewisD. (2018).
The negative health effects of external whistleblowing: A study of some key factors.The Social Science Journal,
55(4), 387–395. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2018.04.002
33.
PascaleR. T.AthosA. G. (1981).
The art of Japanese management.Business Horizons,
24(6), 83–85.
34.
PeetersB. (2004).
“Thou shalt not be a tall poppy”: Describing an Australian communicative (and behavioral) norm.Intercultural Pragmatics,
1, 71–92. doi:10.1515/iprg.2004.008
35.
PenningtonR. (2018).
Making space in social media: #MuslimWomensDay in Twitter.Journal of Communication Inquiry,
42, 199–217.
PipyrouS. (2018).
#MeToo is little more than mob rule//vs//#MeToo is a legitimate form of social justice. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory,
8(3), 415–419.
38.
PollettaF.JasperJ. M. (2001).
Collective identity and social movements.Annual Review of Sociology,
27(1), 283–305.
TreréE. (2015).
Reclaiming, proclaiming, and maintaining collective identity in the# YoSoy132 movement in Mexico: An examination of digital frontstage and backstage activism through social media and instant messaging platforms.Information, Communication & Society,
18(8), 901–915. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043744
ZarkovD.DavisK. (2018).
Ambiguities and dilemmas around #MeToo: #ForHow Long and #WhereTo?European Journal of Women’s Studies,
25(1), 3–9. doi:10.1177/1350506817749436
