This study analyzes how the Half the Sky Movement uses the concept of women’s empowerment to engage female social gamers in a neoliberal development project that turns leisure time into development labor. While the Facebook game has successfully garnered global attention from mainstream media, celebrity endorsements, and impressive public participation, this study argues that it problematically reinforces a dominant approach to development at odds with a feminist understanding of gender and empowerment. Through active design choices, the organization has worked to create a gendered, social media game space that prioritizes individual financial empowerment and monetary aid.
AguilarD. D.LacsamanaA. E. (2004) Women and globalization, Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.
2.
AlvarezS. (1999) Advocating feminism: The Latin American feminist NGO ‘boom’. International Feminist Journal of Politics1(2): 181–209.
3.
ArceA. (2003) Creating or regulating development: Representing modernities through language and discourse. In: ArceA.LongN. (eds) Anthropology, development and modernities: Exploring discourses, counter-tendencies and violence, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 32–51.
4.
BrownW. (2003) Neo-liberalism and the end of liberal democracy. Theory & Event7(1): 1–24.
5.
Burak, A. (2013). [Speaker]. G4C13 Half the Sky Spotlight, Part One: Asi Burak. Retrieved from YouTube.com.
6.
Cameron, J. & Haanstra, A. (2008). Development made sexy: How it happened and what it means. Third World Quarterly, 29(8), 1475–1489.
7.
Choudry, A. & Kapoor, D. (2013). NGOization: Complicity, Contradictions and Prospects. London: Zed Books.
8.
ConnellyM. P.Murray-LIT.MacDonaldM.ParpartJ. L. (2002) Feminisms and development: Theoretical perspectives. In: ParpartJ.ConnellyP.BarritreauV. U. (eds) Theoretical perspectives on gender and development, Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Center, pp. 51–160.
9.
CornwallA.HarrisonE.WhiteheadA. (2007) Gender myths and feminist fables: The struggle for interpretive power in gender and development. Development and Change38(1): 1–20.
10.
DingoR. (2012) Turning the tables on the megarhetoric of women’s empowerment. In: DingoR.ScottJ. B. (eds) The megarhetorics of global development, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 174–198.
11.
DoveyJ.KennedyH. (2006) Game cultures: Computer games as new media, New York, NY: Open University Press.
12.
Dyer-WithefordN.de PeuterG. (2009) Games of empire: Global capitalism and video games, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
13.
ElsonD. (1995) Male bias in the development process, Manchester, England: Oxford University Press.
EscobarA. (1984) Discourse and power in development: Michael Foucault and the relevance of his work to the third world. AlternativesX: 377–400.
16.
Fernandez-VaraC. (2015) Introduction to game analysis, New York, NY: Routledge.
17.
Fisher, J. (2016). Toward a political economic framework for analyzing Digital Development Games: A case study of three games for Africa. Communication, Culture & Critique, 9(1), 30–48.
18.
FlanaganM. (2006) Making games for social change. AI & Society20: 493–505.
19.
FlanaganM.NissenbaumH. (2014) Values at play in digital games, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
Gamification Co. (2013). Asi Burak–Half the Sky: Lessons from Games for Change (GSummit SF 2013). Retrieved from YouTube.com.
21.
HajerM. (1995) The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process, Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
JarrettK. (2014) The relevance of “women’s work”: Social reproduction and immaterial labor in digital media. Television and New Media15(1): 14–29.
26.
KabeerN. (1994) Reversed realities: Gender hierarchies in development thought, London, England: Verso.
27.
KarimL. (2008) Demystifying micro-credit: The Grameen Bank, NGOs, and neoliberalism in Bangladesh. Cultural Dynamics20(1): 5–29.
28.
KarimL. (2011) Microfinance and its discontents: Women in debt in Bangladesh, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
29.
KwamiJ.Wolf-MonteiroB.SteevesH. L. (2011) Toward a ‘macro– micro’ analysis of gender, power and ICTs: A response to Micky Lee’s feminist political economic critique of the human development approach to new ICTs. The International Communication Gazette73(6): 539–549.
30.
LernerD. (1958) The passing of traditional society: Modernizing the Middle East, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
31.
Lewis, D., Rodgers, D., & Woolcock, M. (2014). Popular representations of development: Insights from novels, films, television and social media. New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
McEwanC. (2009) Postcolonialism and development, New York, NY: Routledge.
33.
MelkoteS.SteevesH. L. (2001) Communication for development in the third world, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
MoserC. (1989) Gender planning in the third world: Meeting practical and strategic gender needs. World Development17(11): 1799–1825.
36.
PearsonR. (2007) Reassessing paid work and women’s empowerment: Lessons from the global economy. In: CornwallA.HarrisonE.WhiteheadA. (eds) Feminisms in development: Contradictions, contestations and challenges, London, England: Zed Books, pp. 201–213.
37.
RaoL. (1963) Communication and development: A study of two Indian villages. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota, St. Paul.
RogersE. (1962) Diffusion of innovations, New York, NY: The Free Press.
40.
SchrammW. (1964) Mass media and national development, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
41.
ShomeR.HegdeR. S. (2002) Culture, communication, and the challenge of globalization. Critical Studies in Media Communication19(2): 172–189.
42.
SinghS. (2007) Deconstructing ‘gender and development’ for ‘identities of women’. International Journal of Social Welfare16: 100–109.
43.
SinghalA.RogersE. M. (1999) Entertainment-education: A communication strategy for social change, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
SinghalA.RogersE. M. (2001) The entertainment-education strategy in campaigns. In: RiceR. E.AtkinsC. (eds) Public communication campaigns, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 343–356.
WilkinsK. G.EnghelF. (2013) The privatization of development through global communication industries: Living proof?Media, Culture & Society35(2): 165–181.
50.
WilkinsK. G.ModyB. (2001) Reshaping development communication: Developing communication and communicating development. Communication Theory11(4): 385–396.
