Digital games historically hold a spotty record on gender depictions. The lack of depth in female characters has long been the norm; however, an increasing number of female protagonists are headlining games. This study used narrative theory to examine depictions of four female protagonists in four 2013 Design, Innovate, Communicate, Entertain Award-Winning Digital Games: The Last of Us, Bioshock Infinite, Tomb Raider, and Beyond: Two Souls. Studying these media depictions provides context for how women’s stories are recorded in society. Stereotype subversions largely occur within familiar game narratives, and the female protagonists were still largely limited and defined by male figures in the games.
AarsethE. J. (1997). Cybertext: Perspectives on ergodic literature. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
2.
BarretoM.EllemersN. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 633–642.
3.
BoldC. (2011). Using narrative in research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
BremondC.CancalonE. D. (1980). The logic of narrative possibilities. New Literary History, 11, 387–411.
5.
CarrD. (1986). Time, narrative, and history. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
6.
CassellJ.JenkinsH. (1998). From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: Gender and computer games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
CoteA. C. (2015). Writing “Gamers” the gendered construction of gamer identity in Nintendo power (1994–1999). Games and Culture. doi:10.1177/1555412015624742
DelamereF. M.ShawS. M. (2008). “They see it as a guy’s game”: The politics of gender in digital games. Leisure/Loisir, 32, 279–302.
10.
DillK. E.ThillK. P. (2007). Video game characters and the socialization of gender roles: Young people’s perceptions mirror sexist media depictions. Sex Roles, 57, 851–864.
FischerH. W.SchaefferS.TrowbridgeM. L. (1992). The impact of media blame assignation on the EOC response to disaster: A case study of the response to the April 26, 1991, Andover (Kansas) Tornado. Quick Response (Report #48). Boulder, CO: University of Colorado, Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center.
13.
FisherW. R. (1995). Narration, knowledge, and the possibility of wisdom. In FisherW. R.GoodmanF. (Eds.), Rethinking knowledge: Reflections across the disciplines (169–192). New York: State University of New York Press.
14.
FossS. K. (1996). Rhetorical criticism: Exploration and practice. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109.
17.
GreenbergB.SherryJ.LachlanK.LucasK.HolmstromA. (2010). Orientations to video games among gender and age groups. Simulation & Gaming, 41, 238–259.
GrimesS. M. (2003, 11). “Shoot Like A Girl!”: The female protagonist in action-adventure video games. Proceedings of the 2003 Digital Games Research Association International Conference: Level Up, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
20.
GrodalT. (2003). Stories for eye, ear, and muscles: Video games, media, and embodied experiences. In WolfM. J. P.PerronB., The video game theory reader (pp. 129–155). London, England: Routledge.
21.
HarrisB. (2014). Console wars: Sega, nintendo, and the battle that defined a generation. New York, NY: Dey Street Books.
IvoryJ. D. (2006). Still a man’s game: Gender representation in online reviews of video games. Mass Communication & Society, 9, 103–114.
24.
JanszJ. (2005). The emotional appeal of violent video games for adolescent males. Communication Theory, 15, 219–241.
25.
JanszJ.MartisR. G. (2007). The Lara phenomenon: Powerful female characters in video games. Sex Roles, 56, 141–148.
26.
JohnsonR. (2013). Toward greater production diversity: Examining social boundaries at a video game studio. Games & Culture, 8, 136–160.
27.
KennedyH. W. (2002). Lara Croft: Feminist icon or cyberbimbo? On the limits of textual analysis. Game Studies: International Journal of Computer Games Research, 2.
28.
KingG.KrzywinskaT. (2006). Tomb raiders and space invaders: Forms and meanings of videogames. London, England: IB Tauris.
29.
KiousisS. (2002). Interactivity: A concept explication. New Media and Society, 4, 355–383.
30.
LynchT.TompkinsJ. E.van DrielI. I.FritzN. (2016). Sexy, strong, and secondary: A content analysis of female characters in video games across 31 Years. Journal of Communication, 66, 564–584.
31.
Maccallum-StewartE. (2008). Real boys carry girly epics: Normalising gender bending in online games. Eludamos: Journal for Computer Game Culture, 2, 27–40.
32.
MartinsN.WilliamsD. C.HarrisonK.RatanR. A. (2009). A content analysis of female body imagery in video games. Sex Roles, 61, 824–836.
33.
Naughty Dog. (2013). The Last of Us [Playstation 3 game]. Santa Monica, CA: Sony Computer Entertainment.
34.
PerreaultG. (2013). Text, image, violent games and god: A concept explication of depiction. Paper presented at the International Communication Association, London, England.
Quantic Dream. (2013). Beyond: Two souls [Playstation 3 game]. Paris, France: Sony Computer Entertainment.
37.
RichardsonL.St PierreE. A. (2008). A method of inquiry. Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, 3, 473.
38.
RiessmanC. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
SampaioA.AragonJ. (2001). Filtered feminisms: Cybersex, e-commerce, and the construction of women’s bodies in cyberspace. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 29, 126–147.
40.
SurmanD. (2007). Pleasure, spectacle and reward in streetfighter II. In AtkinsB.KryzwinskaT. (Eds.), Videogame, player, text (pp. 204–221). Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
41.
VordererP. (2000). Interactive entertainment and beyond. In ZillmannD.VordererP. (Eds.), Media entertainment (pp. 21–37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42.
WilliamsD.MartinsN.ConsalvoM.IvoryJ. D. (2009). The virtual census: Representations of gender, race and age in video games. New Media & Society, 11, 815–834.
43.
Yuval-DavisN. (2010). Theorizing identity: Beyond the ‘us’ and ‘them’dichotomy. Patterns of Prejudice, 44, 261–280.
