Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study examines the 2013 Virginia gubernatorial campaign to see how the state's newspapers covered a third-party candidate in a year in which voters said they were looking for an alternative to the Democrat and Republican. The study found that the third-party gubernatorial candidate received significantly less news coverage than the Democrat and Republican, even though he had strong favorability ratings while the major-party nominees were highly unpopular. The Democrat and Republican were mentioned more frequently in stories, headlines, and leads; they were quoted more often; and their issue positions were discussed more frequently than were those of the Libertarian. The study supports critical studies theory that the mainstream news media protect established power rather than acting as a conduit through which citizens can learn about all of their choices in an election.

Keywords

hegemony journalism journalism and democracy media and democracy political discourse

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abercrombie

Hill

Turner

B. S.

(1980) The dominant ideology thesis, London, England: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.

Abramson

P. R.

Aldrich

J. H.

Paolino

Rohde

D. W.

(2000) Challenges to the American two-party system: Evidence from the 1968, 1980, 1992, and 1996 presidential elections. Political Research Quarterly 53(3): 495–522.

Adams

(1984) Media coverage of campaign '84: A preliminary report. Public Opinion 7: 9–13.

Alexseev

M. A.

Bennett

W. L.

(1995) For whom the gates open: News reporting and government source patterns in the United States, Great Britain, and Russia. Political Communication 12(4): 395–412.

Altheide

D. L.

(1984) Media hegemony: A failure of perspective. The Public Opinion Quarterly 48(2): 476–490.

Altschull

J. H.

(1995) Agents of power: The media and public policy, 2nd. White Plains, NY: Longman.

Asp

(2007) Fairness, informativeness and scrutiny. Nordicom Review 28: 31–49.

Atkin

C. K.

Gaudino

(1984) The impact of polling on the mass media. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 472(1): 119–128.

Beckel, M. (2013, November 7). Libertarians declare “mission accomplished” in Virginia. Public Integrity. Retrieved from http://www.publicintegrity.org/2013/11/07/13697/libertarians-declare-mission-accomplished-virginia-after-super-pac-help.

10.

Berggren

J. D.

(2005) Ralph Nader and the green party: The double-edged sword of a candidate, campaign-centered strategy. The Forum 3(1): 1–12.

11.

Berkowitz

(1987) TV news sources and news channels: A study in agenda-building. Journalism Quarterly 64(2): 508–513.

12.

Berkowitz

(1992) Who sets the media agenda? The ability of policymakers to determine news decisions. In: Kennamer

J. D.

(ed.) Public opinion, the press, and public policy, Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, pp. 81–102.

13.

Berkowitz

Beach

D. W.

(1993) News sources and news content: The effect of routine news, conflict and proximity. Journalism Quarterly 70(1): 4–12.

14.

Bouie, J. (2013, August 6). Virginia's gubernatorial race has turned into a sad, sleazy circus. Daily Beast. Retrieved from http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/08/06/virginia-s-gubernatorial-race-has-turned-into-a-sad-sleazy-circus.html.

15.

Brown

J. D.

Bybee

C. R.

Wearden

S. T.

Straughan

D. M.

(1987) Invisible power: Newspaper news sources and the limits of diversity. Journalism Quarterly 64(1): 45–54.

16.

Callaghan

Schnell

(2001) Assessing the democratic debate: How the news media frame elite policy discourse. Political Communication 18(2): 183–212.

17.

Carragee

K. M.

(1993) A critical evaluation of debates examining the media hegemony thesis. Western Journal of Communication 57(3): 330–348.

18.

Dem has Likely Voter Lead in Virginia Governor's Race. (2013). Quinnipiac University poll. Hamden, CT: Quinnipiac University.

19.

Doherty, B. (October 2, 2013) Robert Sarvis: Libertarian candidate for governor of Virginia with double-digit poll numbers. Retrieved from Reason.com, https://reason.com/archives/2013/10/02/robert-sarvis-libertarian-candidate-for.

20.

Dvorak, P. (2013, October 15). Virginia is not for lover of either gubernatorial candidate. Washington Post, pp. B1,.

21.

Dunn

D. D.

(1969) Public officials and the press, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

22.

Dwyre

Kolodny

(1997) Barriers to minor party success and prospects for change. In: Herrnson

P. S.

Green

J. C.

(eds) Multiparty politics in America, New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc, pp. 173–182.

23.

Entman

(1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43(4): 51–58.

24.

Entman

(2007) Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communications 57(1): 164.

25.

Funkhouser

R. G.

(1973) The issues of the sixties: An exploratory study in the dynamics of public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly 37(1): 62–75. Spring.

26.

Gamson

W. A.

Croteau

Hoynes

Sasson

(1992) Media images and the social construction of reality. Annual Review of Sociology 18: 373–393.

27.

Gans

H. J. G.

(1979) Deciding what's news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek and Time, New York, NY: Vintage Books.

28.

Ginger, G. (September 30, 2012). Is Virginia going purple? Politico. Retrieved from http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0912/81829.html.

29.

Gitlin

(1980) The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

30.

Golan

Wanta

(2001) Second-level agenda setting in the New Hampshire primary: A comparison of coverage in three newspapers and public perceptions of candidates. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 78(2): 247–259.

31.

Graber

D. A.

(1997) Mass media and American politics, Washington, DC: CQ Press.

32.

Hall

(1977) Culture, the media and the ‘Ideological Effect.’. In: James

Michael

Janet

(eds) Mass communication and society, London, England: Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd.

33.

Hallin

D. C.

(1984) The media, the war in Vietnam, and political support: A critique of the thesis of an oppositional media. The Journal of Politics 46(1): 2–24.

34.

Harmon

M. D.

(2000) Casting the 2000 U.S. Presidential primaries. Atlantic Journal of Communication 12(2): 93–104.

35.

In U.S., perceived need for third party reaches new high. (2013). Gallup poll. Hamden, CT: Quinnipiac University.

36.

Iyengar

(1987) Television news and citizens' explanations of national affairs. The American Political Science Review 81(3): 815–832.

37.

Iyengar

(1991) Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

38.

Iyengar

Kinder

D. R.

(1987) News that matters: Television and American opinion, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

39.

Jacobs, B. (2013, November 8). Libertarian Robert Sarvis drew record high votes in Virginia. The Daily Beast. Retrieved from http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/11/08/libertarian-robert-sarvis-drew-record-high-votes-in-virginia.html.

40.

Jansen

S. C.

(1994) Market censorship revisited: Press freedom, journalistic practices, and the emerging world order. Communication Yearbook 17: 481–504.

41.

Joslyn

(1984) Mass media and elections, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.

42.

Kim

Scheugele

D. A.

Shanahan

(2002) Think about it this way: Attribute agenda-setting function of the press and the public's evaluation of a local issue. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 79(1): 7–23.

43.

Kiousis

Bantimaroudis

Ban

(1999) Candidate image attributes: Experiments on the substance dimension of second level agenda setting. Communication Research 26(4): 414–428.

44.

Kirch

J. F.

(2013) News coverage different for third-party candidates. Newspaper Research Journal 34(4): 40–53.

45.

Krippendorff

(2004) Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology, 2nd. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

46.

Lippmann

(1965) Public opinion, New York, NY: The Free Press.

47.

Lowi

T. J.

(1999) Toward a responsible three-party system: Plan or obituary? In: Green

J. C.

Shea

D. M.

(eds) The state of the parties: The changing role of contemporary American parties, 3rd. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp. 171–189.

48.

Mason

(2007) Reporting the Fiji coups: Elite sources, journalistic practice and the status quo. Pacific Journalism Review 13(1): 107–123.

49.

McAuliffe has 6-point lead in close Virginia government race. (2013). Quinnipiac University poll. Hamden, CT: Quinnipiac University.

50.

McCombs

(2004) Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion, Cambridge, England: Polity Press.

51.

McCombs

(2005) A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies 6(4): 543–557.

52.

McCombs

M. E.

Shaw

D. L.

(1972) The agenda-setting function of the mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly 36(2): 176–187.

53.

McLeod

J. M.

Becker

L. B.

Byrnes

J. E.

(1974) Another look at the agenda-setting function of the press. Communications Research 1(2): 131–165.

54.

McLeod

D. M.

Hertog

J. K.

(1992) The manufacture of public opinion by reporters: Informal cues for public perceptions of protest groups. Discourse & Society 3(3): 259–275.

55.

Meyrowitz

(1995) The problem of getting on the media agenda: A case study in competing logics of campaign coverage. In: Kathleen

E. K.

(ed.) Presidential campaign discourse: Strategic communication problems, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 35–67.

56.

Miller, Z., & Rogers, A. (2013, June 3). The dirtiest, nastiest, low-down campaign in America: Cuccinelli vs. McAuliffe. Time. Retrieved from http://swampland.time.com/2013/06/03/the-dirtiest-low-down-campaign-in-america-cuccinelli-vs-mcauliffe/?iid=sl-main-lead.

57.

On the Issues. (2013). Robert Sarvis. Retrieved from http://www.ontheissues.org/Robert_Sarvis.htm.

58.

Our choice for governor in 2013: None of the above. [Editorial]. (2013, October 20). Richmond Times-Dispatch, pp. E2. Retrieved from http://www.richmond.com/opinion/our-opinion/article_6a2c5e41-20f3-561a-a25d-52eedf4741f3.html.

59.

Patterson

T. E.

(1980) The mass media election: How Americans choose their president, New York, NY: Praeger Publishers.

60.

Patterson

T. E.

(1994) Out of order, New York, NY: Vintage Books.

61.

Payne, D. (2013, September 17). Three's a crowd. Style Weekly. Retrieved from http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/threes-a-crowd/Content?oid=1953994.

62.

Pirch, K. A. (2004). The others: Third party presidential candidates and the elite print media, 1968–2000 (Unpublished dissertation). University of Oregon, IL, USA.

63.

Pulice, J. (2013, December 14). Distasteful elections. Harvard Political Review. Retrieved from http://www.iop.harvard.edu/distasteful-elections.

64.

Rachlin

(1988) News as hegemonic reality: American political culture and the framing of news accounts, New York, NY: Praiger Publishers.

65.

Ramsden

G. P.

(1996) Media coverage of issues and candidates: What balance is appropriate in a democracy? Political Science Quarterly 111(1): 65–81.

66.

Reese

S. D.

(1991) Setting the media's agenda: A power balance perspective. Communication Yearbook 14: 309–340.

67.

Reinhard, B. (2013, August 8). What Virginia voters really think of terry Mcauliffe and Ken Cuccinelli. National Review. Retrieved from http://www.nationaljournal.com/s/73429/what-virginia-voters-really-think-terry-mcauliffe-ken-cuccinelli.

68.

Robert Who? [Editorial]. (2013, July 18). Roanoke Times. Retrieved from http://www.roanoke.com/opinion/editorials/robert-who/article_f089e631-ef8d-5b5b-b900-6548c6b1fa48.html.

69.

Robinson

M. J.

Sheehan

M. A.

(1980) Over the wire and on TV, New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

70.

Rosenstone

S. J.

Behr

R. L.

Lazarus

E. H.

(1996) Third parties in America: Citizen response to major party failure, 2nd. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

71.

Scheufele

Tewksbury

(2007) Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication 57: 9–20.

72.

Schudson

(2008) News and democratic society: Past, present, and future. The Hedgehob Review 10(2): 7–21.

73.

Shaw

D. L.

McCombs

M. E.

(1977) The emergence of American political issues: The agenda-setting function of the press, St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.

74.

Sifry

M. L.

(2003) Spoiling for a fight: Third-party politics in America, New York, NY: Routledge.

75.

Sigal

L. V.

(1973) Reporters and officials: The organization and politics of newsmaking, Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.

76.

Sigal

L. V. S.

(1996) Sources make the news. In: Manoff

R. K.

Schudson

(eds) Reading the news, New York, NY: Pantheon Books, pp. 9–37.

77.

Simon, M. (April 14, 2014). GOP's purple-state problem. Salon. Retrieved from http://www.salon.com/2014/04/18/gops_purple_state_problem_how_a_virginia_medicaid_battle_augurs_huge_risks_for_the_party/.

78.

Smith

(1993) News sources and power elites in news coverage of the Exxon Valez oil spill. Journalism Quarterly 70(2): 393–403.

79.

Son

Y. J.

Weaver

D. H.

(2005) Another look at what moves public opinion: Media agenda setting and polls in the 200 U.S. Election. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 18(2): 174–197.

80.

Son

Y. J.

Weaver

D. H.

(2006) Another look at what moves public opinion: Media agenda setting and polls in the 2000 U.S. Election. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 18(2): 174–197.

81.

Stempel

G. H.

(1969) The prestige press meets the third-party challenge. Journalism Quarterly 46(4): 699–706.

82.

Stempel

G. H.

Windhauser

J. H.

(1984) The prestige press revisited: Coverage of the 1980 presidential campaign. Journalism Quarterly 61(1): 49–55.

83.

Stovall

J. G.

(1985) The third-party challenge of 1980: News coverage of the presidential candidates. Journalism Quarterly 62(2): 266–271.

84.

Streitmatter

(1997) Mightier than the sword: How the news media have shaped American history, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

85.

“Too Conservative” Tag Hurts Cuccinelli in Virginia. (2013). Quinnipiac University poll. Hamden, CT: Quinnipiac University.

86.

Tuccille, J. D. (2013, August 26). Journalists wonder why they're not paying attention to Virginia's libertarian candidate for governor. Reason. Retrieved from http://reason.com/blog/2013/08/26/journalists-wonder-why-theyre-not-paying.

87.

Tuchman

(1978) Making news: A study in the construction of reality, New York, NY: The Free Press.

88.

Virginia Libertarian for governor vote total shows Libertarian Party rising. (2013, November 6). OC Politics Blog [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.lp.org/news/press-releases/virginia-libertarian-for-governor-vote-total-shows-lp-rising.

89.

Virginia State Board of Elections. (2013). Official results for 2013 general election. Retrieved from http://elections.virginia.gov/Files/Electionresults/2013/November-5/electionresults.virginia.gov/resultsSWde2d.html?eid=7&type=SWR&map=CTY.

90.

Virginia voters dislike McAuliffee less than Cuccinelli. (2013). Quinnipiac University poll. Hamden, CT: Quinnipiac University.

91.

Weaver

D. H.

(2007) Thoughts on agenda setting, framing, and priming. Journal of Communication 57(1): 142–147.

92.

Weaver

D. H.

Graber

D. A.

McCombs

M. E.

Eyal

C. H.

(1981) Media agenda-setting in a presidential election: Issues, images, and interest, New York, NY: Praiger Publishers.

93.

Will, G. (2013, October 25). Despite voter anger, third-party candidate has no chance. Las Cruces Sun-News. Retrieved from http://www.lcsun-news.com/las_cruces-opinion/ci_24380193/despite-voter-anger-third-party-candidate-has-no.

94.

Winter

J. P.

(1981) Contingent conditions in the agenda-setting process. In: Wilhoit

G. C.

de Bock

(eds) Mass communication review yearbook, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 235–243.

95.

Zaller

(1999) A theory of media politics: How the interests of politicians, journalists, and citizens shape the news, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

96.

Zaller

Hunt

(1994) The rise and fall of candidate perot: Unmediated versus mediated politics—Part I. Political Communication 11(4): 357–390.

97.

Zito, S. (2013, October 27). Virginia governor hopefuls struggle to appeal to bases. Pittsburgh Tribune Review. Retrieved from http://triblive.com/politics/politicalheadlines/4888413-74/cuccinelli-mcauliffe-virginia#axzz3LihuT6qz.

Virginia's Invisible Candidate

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References