This article uses the theory of articulation to analyze the debate surrounding the decision by the Government of India to open up the Indian print media to foreign investment. The decision was preceded and followed by intense wrangling within the pages of the very newspapers that were to be affected by it, thus resulting in a contentious debate around the move. Using the theory of articulation to explore the mechanism of discursive power exercised by each side within the debate the paper argues that each side articulated the same four themes with culturally specific meanings to shape the government’s decision in their favor. This exploration seeks to emphasize the discursive dimension of globalization as a key site where power struggles are played out and consensus about policy choices is created.
Audit Bureau of Circulation. (n.d.). Areawise analysis for the period July/December 2007 to January-June 2010. Retrieved from http://www.auditbureau.org/.
4.
ChatterjeeP. (1993) Communities and the nation. The Partha Chatterjee omnibus, New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press, pp. 220–241.
5.
Cheers to FDI in print from India Inc, markets. (2002, June 26). The Indian Express. Retrieved from www.theindianexpress.com.
6.
Choudhury, R. R. (2002, March 25). FDI in the print media. The Hindu Business Line. Retrieved from www.thehindubusinessline.com.
7.
CloudD. (1998) The rhetoric of <family values>: Scapegoating, Utopia and the privatization of social responsibility. Western Journal of Communication62(4): 387–419.
8.
Coils of the past. (2002, June 25). The Telegraph. Retrieved from www.telegraphindia.com.
9.
CollinsR. (2003) Enter the Grecian horse? Regulation of foreign ownership of the media in the UK. Policy Studies24(1): 17–31.
10.
Decision on FDI in print media deplored. (2002, June 27). The Hindu. Retrieved from www.thehindu.com.
11.
del RioE. (2012) Accentuate the positive: Americanos and the articulation of Latina/o life in the United States. Journal of Communication Inquiry36(3): 179–201.
12.
DeLucaK. (1999) Articulation theory: A discursive grounding for rhetorical practice. Philosophy and Rhetoric32(4): 334–348.
13.
Edge, M. (2009). How the camel got in the tent: The Canadian assault on Australia’s foreign media ownership limits. Media International Australia, (132), 42–53. Retrieved from http://marcedge.com/camel.pdf.
14.
FaircloughN. (2006) Language and globalization, Oxon, England: Routledge.
15.
FDI in print: Sushma rips into Cong, Mulayam. (2002, July 18). The Indian Express. Retrieved from www.theindianexpress.com.
16.
Few takers for FDI in print media. (2002, March 24). The Times of India. Retrieved from www.thetimesofindia.com.
17.
18.
Investment Promotion Board. (2010). FIPB – Review 2010. New Delhi, India: Foreign Investment Promotion Board, Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, Government of India. Retrieved from http://www.fipbindia.com/FIPB%20REVIEW%202010.pdf.
19.
FoucaultM. (1982) Archaeology of knowledge, New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
20.
GoldingP.MurdockG. (1991) Culture, communications, and political economy. In: CuranJ.GurevitchM. (eds) Mass media and society, London, England: Hodder Arnold, pp. 15–32.
21.
Govt allows 26% FDI in print media. (2002, June 26). The Times of India. Retrieved from www.timesofindia.com.
22.
GrossbergL. (1992) We gotta get out of this place: Popular conservatism and postmodern culture, New York, NY: Routledge.
23.
HallS. (1985) Signification, representation, ideology: Althusser and the post-structuralist debates. Critical Studies in Mass Communication2(2): 91–114.
24.
HallS. (1986) On postmodernism and articulation: An interview with Stuart Hall. Journal of Communication Inquiry10: 45–60.
25.
HarveyD. (2006) Spaces of global capitalism: A theory of uneven geographical development, New York, NY: Verso.
26.
JamesonF. (1998) Notes on globalization as a philosophical issue. In: JamesonF.MiyoshiM. (eds) The cultures of globalization, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 54–77.
27.
Jaya opposes FDI in print. (2002, June 26). The Times of India. Retrieved from www.thetimesofindia.com.
28.
Jayalalitha opposes FDI in print media. (2002, June 27). The Hindu. Retrieved from www.thehindu.com.
29.
JeffreyR. (2000) India’s newspaper revolution: Capitalism, politics and the Indian language press 1977–1999, New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
30.
Joshua, A. (2002, June 26). Cabinet clears 26 per cent FDI in print media. The Hindu. Retrieved from www.thehindu.com.
Kohli-KhandekarV. (2010) The Indian media business, New Delhi, India: Response Books.
34.
Kraszewski, J. (2002, Fall). Recontextualizing the historical reception of blaxploitation: Articulations on class, Black Nationalism, and anxiety in the genre’s advertisements. The Velvet Light Trap (50), pp. 48–61. Retrieved from http://utpress.utexas.edu/index.php/journals/the-velvet-light-trap#tabs-2.
LaclauE. (1977) Politics and ideology in Marxist theory, London, England: New Left Books.
37.
LaclauE. (2007) On populist reason, New York, NY: Verso.
38.
LipariL. (2000) Toward a discourse approach to polling. Discourse Studies2(2): 187–215.
39.
LippmanW. (1922) Public opinion, New York, NY: Free Press Paperbacks.
40.
LippmanW. (1925) The Phantom public, New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
41.
McDowellS. P. (1997) Globalization, liberalization and policy change: A political economy of India’s communications sector, New York, NY: St. Martin Press.
42.
McGeeM. C. (1980) The “Ideograph”: A link between rhetoric and ideology. Quarterly Journal of Speech66(1): 1–16.
43.
Media, parties deplore FDI in print. (2002, June 26). The Times of India. Retrieved from www.thetimesofindia.com.
44.
MoscoV. (1996) The political economy of communication, London, England: Sage.
Papering over facts: The idea that FDI in print media will make slaves of us is plain codswallop. (2002, June 25). The Indian Express. Retrieved from www.theindianexpress.com.
53.
Parameswaran, R. (2009, Fall). Moral dilemmas of an immoral nation: Gender, sexuality, and journalism in page 3. The Image of the Journalist in Popular Culture Journal, p. 1.
54.
RajagopalA. (1997) Politics after television, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Ramachandra, S. (1999, December 12). What price foreign hand in Indian print media. The Times of India. Retrieved from www.thetimesofindia.com.
56.
Reading the fine print: Finally its the quality of news that counts. (2002, June 27). The Indian Express. Retrieved from www.theindianexpress.com.
57.
RousseauJ.-J. (2002) The social contract (1762) (S. Dunn, Trans.), New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
58.
RSS, BJP allies opposed to FDI in print. (2002, June 24). The Times of India. Retrieved from www.thetimesofindia.com.
59.
Sainath, P. (2004, June 1). McMedia & market jihad. The Hindu. Retrieved from www.thehindu.com.
60.
Sena condemns decision on FDI in print media. (2002, June 28). The Hindu. Retrieved from www.thehindu.com.
61.
SikkaT. (2008) Ballistic missile defense and articulation theory: An analysis of technology using a cultural studies approach. Journal of Language and Politics7(1): 121–137.
62.
SlackJ. D. (1996) The theory and method of articulation in cultural studies. In: ChenK.-H.MorleyD. (eds) Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies, London, England: Routledge, pp. 112–127.
63.
SonwalkarP. (2002) Murdochization of the Indian press: From by-line to bottom-line. Media, Culture & Society24: 821–834.
64.
TDP, oppn to oppose FDI in print. (2002, June 25). The Times of India. Retrieved from www.thetimesofindia.com.
65.
ValckeP. (2009) From ownership regulations to legal indicators of media pluralism: Background, typologies and methods. Journal of Media Business Studies6(3): 19–42.
66.
VavrusF. (2002) Uncoupling the articulation between girls’ education and tradition in Tanzania. Gender and Education14(4): 367–389.
67.
YinJ. (2005) Constructing the other: A critical reading of The Joy Luck Club. The Howard Journal of Communication16: 149–175.
