This article focuses on how viewers decide what to watch in a context of almost infinite video content availability and a lasting expansion of the process of digitization. We investigate to what extent viewers apply an active search process toward video content. Therefore we applied a focus group methodology. Seven focus group sessions were conducted, totaling 47 participants. We found that this process is guided by a combination of contextual, content-related, and personal factors, which simultaneously free as well as restrict the viewer in his choice. Moreover it can be concluded that a gradual shift is taking place in who fulfills the gatekeeper’s role.
BarkhuusL. (2009, April4-9). Television on the Internet: New practices, new viewers. Paper presented at the CHI 2009, Boston, MA.
3.
BauwensJ. (2002). Burgers voor de buis: Een kwantitatief en kwalitatief onderzoek naar de relatie tussen tv-consumptie en burgerschap [Citizens for the tube: A quantitative and qualitative study of the relationship between television consumption and citizenship] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
4.
CareyJ. (2008). Peer-to-peer video file sharing: What can we learn from consumer behavior? In NoamE. M.PupilloL. M. (Eds.), peer-to-peer video (pp. 129-148). New York, NY: Springer.
5.
De VinckS. (2011). Revolutionary road? Looking back at the position of the European film sector and the results of European-level film support in view of their digital future (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
6.
EllisJ. (2000). Seeing things: Television in the age of uncertainty. London, UK: I.B. Tauris.
7.
GibsJ. (2009). The new screen for video. In GerbargD. (Ed.), Television goes digital (pp. 11-28). New York, NY: Springer.
8.
GlorieuxI.MinnenJ.Van TienhovenP. (2008). Het collectieve ritme van België. Evoluties in het levensritme van de Belgen op basis van tijdsbestedingsonderzoek uit 1966, 1999, en 2005[The collective rhythm of Belgium. Evolutions in the rhythm of the Belgians based on time use survey from 1966, 1999, and 2005]. Brussels, Belgium: Onderzoeksgroep TOR, Vakgroep Sociologie, Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
9.
Interdisciplinary Institute for Broadband Technology. (2011). Digimeter, wave 3 IBBT-iLab.o. Retrieved from www.digimeter.be
10.
Interdisciplinary Institute for Broadband Technology. (2012). Digimeter, wave 4 IBBT-iLab.o. Retrieved from www.digimeter.be
PurcellK. (2010). The state of online video. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
15.
SandelowskiM. (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 18, 179-183.
16.
SelwynN. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6, 341-362.
17.
Van den BroeckW. (2011). From analogue to digital: The silent (r)evolution? A qualitative study on the domestication of interactive digital television in Flanders (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
18.
Van den BroeckW.LievensB.PiersonJ. (2006, July23-28). Domestication research for media and technology development: A case study. Paper presented at the conference proceedings of the IAMCR 2006, Cairo, Egypt.
