With Facebook,Blogs,and Fake News,Teens Reject Journalistic “Objectivity”

Abstract

This article examines the news behaviors and attitudes of teenagers, an understudied demographic in the research on youth and news media. Based on interviews with 61 racially diverse high school students, it discusses how adolescents become informed about current events and why they prefer certain news formats to others. The results reveal changing ways news information is being accessed, new attitudes about what it means to be informed, and a youth preference for opinionated rather than objective news. This does not indicate that young people disregard the basic ideals of professional journalism but, rather, that they desire more authentic renderings of them.

Keywords

youth and news Facebook fake news objectivity civic engagement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amadeo

Torney-Purta

Barber

C. H.

(2004). Attention to media and trust in media sources: Analysis of data from the IEA Civic Education Study. College Park, MD: The Center For Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement.

Associated Press. (2008). A new model for news: Studying the deep structure of young adult news consumption (A research report from the AP and the Context-Based Research Group). Retrieved from http://www.ap.org/newmodel.pdf

Barnhurst

Wartella

(1991). Newspapers and citizenship: Young adult’s subjective experience of newspapers. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 8, 195-209.

Barnhurst

Wartella

(1998). Young citizens, American TV newscasts and the collective memory. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 15(3), 279-305.

Baym

(2005). The Daily Show: Discursive integration and the reinvention of political journalism. Political Communication, 22, 259-276.

Baym

(2010). From Cronkite to Colbert: The evolution of broadcast news. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.

Bennett

W. L.

(2005, September 1). Civic learning in changing democracies: challenges for citizenship and civic education. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.

Bennett

W. L.

(2008). Changing citizenship in the digital age. Civic Life Online: Learning how digital media can engage youth (pp. 1-24). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Brown

(2005). Abandoning the news (pp. 1-16). New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation.

10.

Buckingham

(1999). Young people, politics and news media: Beyond political socialisation. Oxford Review of Education, 25, 171-184.

11.

Clark

Van Slyke

(2010). Beyond the echo chamber: Reshaping Politics through networked progressive media. New York, NY: New Press.

12.

Collins

S. J.

Armstrong

C. L.

(2008). U of Florida students prefer campus paper to free daily. Newspaper Research Journal, 29(1), 77-89.

13.

Costera Meijer

(2003). What is quality television news? A plea for extending the professional repertoire of newsmakers. Journalism Studies, 4(1), 15-29.

14.

Costera Meijer

(2007). The paradox of popularity: How young people experience the news. Journalism Studies, 8(1), 1-22.

15.

Fox

Kolloen

Sahin

(2007). No Joke: A Comparison of Substance in The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and Broadcast Network Television Coverage of the 2004 Presidentail Election Campaign. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 51(2), 213-227.

16.

Frola

2006. Tracking the teenage path to news. Retrieved from http://www.poynter.org/content/content_view.asp?id=110852

17.

Gans

(1979). Deciding what’s news. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

18.

Garnham

(1992). The media and the public sphere. In Calhoun

(Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 359-376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

19.

Gigli

(2001). Young people and media in Central and Eastern Europe, the CIS, and Baltic states. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.org/magic/resources/InterMedia2000.pdf

20.

Grusin

E. K.

Stone

G. C.

(1993). The newspaper in education and new readers: Hooking kids on newspapers through classroom, Journalism Monographs, 141, 1-39.

21.

Hallin Daniel

(2000). Commercialism and Professionalism in the American News Media. In Curran

Gurevitch

(Eds.), Mass Media and Society (3rd edition, pp. 218-237). London, UK: Edward Arnold.

22.

Harrington

(2005). The democracy of conversation: The panel and the public sphere. Media International Australia, 116, 75-87.

23.

Harrington

(2008a). Future-proofing journalism: Youthful tastes and the challenge for the Academy. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 22, 395-407.

24.

Harrington

(2008b). Popular news in the 21st century: Time for a critical approach? Journalism; Theory, Practice and Criticism, 9, 266-284.

25.

Jones

(2008). Losing the news: The future of the news that feeds democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

26.

Lazarsfeld

Katz

(1955). Personal influence. New York, NY: Free Press.

27.

Lenhart

Purcell

Smith

Zickuhr

(2010). Social media and young adults. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Social-Media-and-Young-Adults.aspx

28.

Livingstone

(2002). Young People and New Media: Childhood and the changing media environment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

29.

Livingstone

(2009). Children and the Internet: Great expectations, challenging realities. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

30.

MacDonald

(2000). Rethinking personalization in current affairs journalism. In Sparks

Tulloch

(Eds.), Tabloid Tales: Global debates over media standards (pp. 251-266). Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.

31.

Marchi

(2012). From disillusion to engagement: Minority teen journalists and the news media. Journalism: Theory, Practice and Criticism. 13(6), 750-765.

32.

McChesney

(2000). Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times. New York, NY: Free Press.

33.

McChesney

(2004). The problem of the media: U.S. communication politics in the 21st century. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.

34.

McKain

(2005). Not necessarily not the news: Gatekeeping, remediation, and the daily show. Journal of American Culture, 28, 415-430.

35.

McKee

(2005). The public sphere: An introduction. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

36.

McMane

(2007 February 15 & 16). Where the young get the news. Paper prepared as part of New Media: The Press Freedom Dimension, sponsored by the World Press Freedom Committee and UNESCO, in partnership with the Coordinating Committee of Press Freedom Organizations and the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, Paris, France.

37.

Miller

(2007). Cultural citizenship: Cosmopolitanism, consumerism, and television in a neoliberal age. Philadelphia, PA: Temple.

38.

Mindich

(2005). Tuned out—Why Americans under 40 don’t watch the news. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

39.

National Annenberg Election Survey. (2004). Daily Show viewers knowledgeable about presidential campaign, National Annenberg Election Survey Shows. Retrieved from http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/Downloads/Political_Communication/naes/2004_03_late-night-knowledge-2_9-21_pr.pdf

40.

Nordenson

(2008). Overload! Journalism’s battle for relevance in an age of too much Information. Columbia Journalism Review, 47(4), 30-42.

41.

Pariser

(2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. New York, NY: Penguin.

42.

Patterson

(2007). Young people and news (A Report from the Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy). Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Retrieved from http://www.hks.harvard.edu/presspol/research/carnegie-knight/young_people_and_news_2007.pdf

43.

Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2004). Cable and Internet loom large in fragmented political news universe: Perceptions of partisan bias seen as growing, especially by Democrats. Retrieved from http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=200

44.

Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2007). Public knowledge of current affairs little changed by news and information revolutions: What Americans know. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2007/04/15/public-knowledge-of-current-affairs-little-changed-by-news-and-information-revolutions/

45.

Purcell

Rainie

Mitchell

Rosenstiel

Olmstead

(2010). Understanding the participatory consumer: How Internet and cell phone users have turned news into a social experience. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/analysis_report/understanding_participatory_news_consumer

46.

Quigley

(1999). Civic education: Recent history, current status, and the future. Albany Law Review, 62, 1425-1451.

47.

Raeymaeckers

(2004). Newspaper editors in search of young readers: content and layout strategies to win new readers. Journalism Studies, 5, 221-232.

48.

Rainie

Smith

(2012). Social networking sites and politics. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Social-networking-and-politics.aspx

49.

Schiller

(2000). Digital capitalism: Networking the global market system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

50.

Schudson

(1999). The good citizen: A history of American civic life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

51.

Schudson

(2001). The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism: Theory, Practice and Criticism, 2, 149-170.

52.

Sherr

Staples

(2004). Working paper 16: News for a new generation. Report 1: Content analysis, interviews, and focus groups. Retrieved from http://www.civicyouth.org/circle-working-paper-16-news-for-a-new-generation-report-1-content-analysis-interviews-and-focus-groups/

53.

Singer

Clark

L. S.

Monserrate

(2009, May). News a la carte: Customization of news consumption by college students. Keynote panel address, presented to the annual Conference of the Magazine Publishers of America, Boulder: Colorado.

54.

Sunstein

(2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

55.

Turner

(2005). Ending the affair: The decline of television current affairs in Australia. Sydney, New South Wales, Australia: University of New South Wales Press.

56.

UNICEF. (2005). World Youth Report. New York, NY: CEE/CIS.

57.

Warner

(2007). Political culture jamming: The dissident humor of The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. Popular Communications, 5(1), 17-36.

58.

Watkins

(2009). The young and the digital: What the migration to social-networking sites, games, and anytime, anywhere media a means for our future. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.