The rhetoric surrounding the creation of American public television promised a new system that would provide the American people with an excellence and freedom never before offered on television. This study critiques public television's primary news program, the NewsHour, in light of the rhetorical promise and sociopolitical limitations surrounding American public television. It concludes that the NewsHour has rejected the ideal of freedom for one of excellence, an excellence that implicitly supports the assumptions of broadcasting's corporate liberal heritage.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aufderheide, Patricia
. 1991. Public television and the public sphere. Critical Studies in Mass Communication8: 168-183.
2.
Avery, Robert K.
, and Robert Pepper. 1979. The politics of interconnection: A history of public television at the national level. Washington, DC: National Association of Educational Broadcasters.
3.
Berman, Edward H.
1983. The influence of the Carnegie, Ford, and Rockefeller Foundations on American foreign policy: The ideology of philanthropy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
4.
Blumler, Jay G.
1993. The British approach to public service broadcasting: From confidence to uncertainty. In Public service broadcasting in a multichannel environment: The history and survival of an ideal, edited by R. K. Avery, 1-28. New York: Longman.
5.
Burke, John E.1972a. The Public Broadcasting Act of 1967—Part I: Historical origins and the Carnegie Commission. EBR6: 105-119.
6.
Burke, John E.1972b. The Public Broadcasting Act of 1967—Part II: The Carnegie Commission report, development of legislation, and the second national conference on long-range financing. EBR6: 178-192.
7.
Carnegie Commission on Educational Television
. 1967. Public television: A program for action. New York: Bantam.
8.
Engelman, Ralph
. 1996. Public radio and television in America: A political history. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Foucault, Michel
. 1972. The archaeology of knowledge. Translated by A. M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon Books.
10.
Fraser, Nancy
. 1992. Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In Habermas and the public sphere, edited by C. Calhoun, 109-142. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
Gans, Herbert J.
1979. Deciding what's news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. New York: Vintage Books.
12.
Habermas, Jurgen
. 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Translated by T. Burger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
Habermas, Jurgen
. 1992. Further reflections on the public sphere. In Habermas and the public sphere, edited by C. Calhoun, 421-461. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
Hall, Stuart
. 1975. Introduction. In Paper voices: The popular press and social change, 1935-1965, edited by A.C.H. Smith, E. Immirzi, and T. Blackwell, 11-24. Totawa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.
15.
Herman, Edward S.
, and Robert W. McChesney. 1997. The global media: The new missionaries of corporate capitalism. Washington, DC: Cassell.
16.
Hoover, Herbert
. 1952. The memoirs of Herbert Hoover: The cabinet and the presidency 1920-1933. New York: Macmillan.
17.
Horwitz, Robert Britt
. 1989. The irony of regulatory reform: The deregulation of American telecommunications. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Hoynes, William
. 1994. Public television for sale: Media, the market, and the public sphere. San Francisco: Westview.
19.
Kellner, Douglas
. 1990. Television and the crisis of democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview.
20.
Lashley, Marilyn E.1992. Even in public television, ownership changes matter. Communication Research19:770-786.
21.
Marchand, Roland
. 1985. Advertising the American dream: Making way for modernity, 1920-1940. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
Morley, David
. 1976. Industrial conflict and the mass media. Sociological Review24:245-268.
23.
NewsHour. 1998. Distributed by MacNeil/Lehrer Productions, Arlington, VA.
24.
Nightly News. 1998. Distributed by NBC News, New York.
25.
Postman, Neil
. 1985. Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. New York: Penguin.
26.
Rowland, Willard D., Jr.
1976. Public involvement: The anatomy of a myth. In The future of public broadcasting, edited by D. Cater and M. J. Nyhan, 109-139. New York: Praeger.
27.
Rowland, Willard D., Jr.1986. Continuing crisis in public broadcasting: A history of disenfranchisement. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media30:251-274.
28.
Rowland, Willard D., Jr.
1993. Public service broadcasting in the United States: Its mandate, institutions, and conflicts. In Public service broadcasting in a multichannel environment: The history and survival of an ideal, edited by R. K. Avery, 157-194. New York: Longman.
29.
Streeter, Thomas
. 1996. Selling the air: A critique of the policy of commercial broadcasting in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
Van Dijk, Teun A.1993. Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society4:249-283.
31.
Williams, Raymond
. 1958. Culture and Society, 1780-1950. New York: Columbia University Press.
32.
World News Tonight. 1998. Distributed by ABC News, New York.
33.
Zelizer, Barbie
. 1997. Journalists as interpretive communities. In Social meanings of news, edited by D. Berkowitz, 401-419. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
