Mandibular reconstruction for segmental defects is a well-studied topic. However, there are conflicting data on the risks of delayed plate-related complications. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess long-term plate-related complications following reconstruction of the mandible with soft tissue and a plate as compared with immediate vascularized bony reconstruction.
Data Sources
A medical librarian created search strategies with a combination of keywords and controlled vocabulary in Ovid Medline (1946–), Embase (1947–), Scopus (1960–), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Clinicaltrials.gov.
Review Methods
Candidate articles were independently reviewed by 2 authors. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were uniformly applied. Articles were considered eligible if they included adequate reporting of plate extrusion and/or fracture and had follow-up ≥12 months.
Results
A total of 2379 patients were included. The risk of plate fracture was low in cases of soft tissue with a plate (5%; 95% CI, 0.03-0.08) and osseous reconstruction (1%). The risk of extrusion following soft tissue and plate reconstruction was 20% (95% CI, 0.15-0.27). In the osseous reconstruction group, the risk of extrusion was 10% (95% CI, 0.06-0.18). Revision surgery was performed twice as often following soft tissue with a plate as compared with vascularized bony reconstruction (32% [95% CI, 0.25-0.40] vs 14% [95% CI, 0.09-0.21], respectively).
Conclusion
Delayed plate-related complications remain a significant problem following segmental defect reconstruction. Soft tissue and plate reconstruction techniques may increase the risk of plate removal and revision surgery.
BakMJacobsonASBuchbinderDUrkenML. Contemporary reconstruction of the mandible. Oral Oncol. 2010;46(2):71-76.
2.
ChepehaDBTeknosTNFungK, et al. Lateral oromandibular defect: when is it appropriate to use a bridging reconstruction plate combined with a soft tissue revascularized flap?Head Neck. 2008;30(6):709-717.
3.
DeleyiannisFW-BRogersCLeeE, et al. Reconstruction of the lateral mandibulectomy defect: management based on prognosis and location and volume of soft tissue resection. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(11):2071-2080.
4.
BhathenaHMKavaranaNM. Primary reconstruction of head and neck cancer with anterior rib, osteomyocutaneous composite flap. Head Neck. 1992;14(3):183-187.
5.
BlackwellKEBuchbinderDUrkenML. Lateral mandibular reconstruction using soft-tissue free flaps and plates. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 1996;122(6):672-678.
6.
WeiFCelikNYangWChenIChangYChenH. Complications after reconstruction by plate and soft-tissue free flap in composite mandibular defects and secondary salvage reconstruction with osteocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(1):37-42.
7.
ArdenRLRachelJDMarksSCDangK. Volume-length impact of lateral jaw resections on complication rates. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 1999;125(1):68-72.
8.
KrollSSchustermanMReeceG. Costs and complications in mandibular reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1992;29(4):341-347.
9.
Arias-GalloJMaremontiPGonzález-OteroT, et al. Long term results of reconstruction plates in lateral mandibular defects: revision of nine cases. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2004;31(1):57-63.
10.
SwartzWBanisJNewtonEDRamasastrySJonesNAclandR. The osteocutaneous scapular flap for mandibular and maxillary reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;77(4):530-545.
11.
GibberMJClainJBJacobsonAS, et al. Subscapular system of flaps: an 8-year experience with 105 patients. Head Neck. 2015;37(8):1200-1206.
12.
O’ConnellJEBajwaMSSchacheAGShawRJ. Head and neck reconstruction with free flaps based on the thoracodorsal system. Oral Oncol. 2017;75:46-53.
13.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJAltmanDG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):6.
14.
BoydJBMDMulhollandRSMDDavidsonJMD, et al. The free flap and plate in oromandibular reconstruction: long-term review and indications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;95(6):1018-1028.
15.
HigginsJPTGreenS, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
16.
SchwarzerG. Meta: an R package for meta-analysis. R News. 2007;7(3):40-45.
17.
SlimKNiniEForestierDKwiatkowskiFPanisYChipponiJ. Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73(9):712-716.
18.
MarianiPBKowalskiLPMagrinJ. Reconstruction of large defects postmandibulectomy for oral cancer using plates and myocutaneous flaps: a long-term follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;35(5):427-432.
19.
PoliTFerrariSBianchiBSesennaE. Primary oromandibular reconstruction using free flaps and thorp plates in cancer patients: a 5-year experience. Head Neck. 2003;25(1):15-23.
20.
ZavatteroEFasolisMGarzino-DemoPBerroneSRamieriGA. Evaluation of plate-related complications and efficacy in fibula free flap mandibular reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(2):397-399.
21.
LinJA-JLohCYYTsaiC-HChangK-PWuJC-HKaoH-K. Free flap outcomes of microvascular reconstruction after repeated segmental mandibulectomy in head and neck cancer patients. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):7951.
22.
OkuraMIsomuraETIidaSKogoM. Long-term outcome and factors influencing bridging plates for mandibular reconstruction. Oral Oncol. 2005;41(8):791-798.
23.
IrishJCGullanePJGilbertRWBrownDHBirtBDBoydJB. Primary mandibular reconstruction with the titanium hollow screw reconstruction plate: evaluation of 51 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96(1):93-99.
24.
LavertuPWanamakerJRBoldELYetmanRJ. The AO system for primary mandibular reconstruction. Am J Surg. 1994;168(5):503-507.
25.
HarshaGReddySGKTalasilaSSalaamSASrinivasuluMReddyVS. Mandibular reconstruction using AO/ASIF stainless steel reconstruction plate: a retrospective study of 36 cases. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012;13(1):75-79.
26.
OffodileACLinJA-JChangK-P, et al. Anterolateral thigh flap combined with reconstruction plate versus double free flaps for composite mandibular reconstruction: a propensity score-matched study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(3):829-836.
27.
DeanNRWaxMKVirginFWMagnusonJSCarrollWRRosenthalEL. Free flap reconstruction of lateral mandibular defects: indications and outcomes. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;146(4):547-552.
28.
HundepoolACDumansAGHoferSOP, et al. Rehabilitation after mandibular reconstruction with fibula free-flap: clinical outcome and quality of life assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37(11):1009-1013.
29.
GarrettNRoumanasEDBlackwellKE, et al. Efficacy of conventional and implant-supported mandibular resection prostheses: study overview and treatment outcomes. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;96(1):13-24.
30.
RoumanasEDGarrettNBlackwellKE, et al. Masticatory and swallowing threshold performances with conventional and implant-supported prostheses after mandibular fibula free-flap reconstruction. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;96(4):289-297.
31.
WeiFCSeahCSTsaiYCLiuSJTsaiMS. Fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap for reconstruction of composite mandibular defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93(2):294-304.
32.
HidalgoDARekowA. A review of 60 consecutive fibula free flap mandible reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96(3):585-596.
33.
ColemanSCBurkeyBBDayTA, et al. Increasing use of the scapula osteocutaneous free flap. Laryngoscope. 2000;110(9):1419-1424.
34.
CordeiroPGHidalgoDA. Soft tissue coverage of mandibular reconstruction plates. Head Neck. 1994;16(2):112-115.
35.
AmitMYenT-CLiaoC-T, et al. Improvement in survival of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: an international collaborative study. Cancer. 2013;119(24):4242-4248.
36.
ZhangHDziegielewskiPTBironVL, et al. Survival outcomes of patients with advanced oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma treated with multimodal therapy: a multi-institutional analysis. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;42(1):30.
37.
HoASKimSTighiouartM, et al. Metastatic lymph node burden and survival in oral cavity cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(31):3601-3609.
38.
ShnayderYLinDDesaiSCNussenbaumBSandJPWaxMK. Reconstruction of the lateral mandibular defect: a review and treatment algorithm. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2015;17(5):367-373.
39.
PrasadJSahovalerATheurerJ, et al. Predictors of plate extrusion in oromandibular free flap reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2018;38(6):682-689.
40.
WoodCBShinnJRAminSNRohdeSLSinardRJ. Risk of plate removal in free flap reconstruction of the mandible. Oral Oncol. 2018;83:91-95.
41.
TsangGFZZhangHYaoC, et al. Hardware complications in oromandibular defects: comparing scapular and fibular based free flap reconstructions. Oral Oncol. 2017;71:163-168.
42.
Al-BustaniSAustinGKAmbroseECMillerJHackmanTGHalvorsonEG. Miniplates versus reconstruction bars for oncologic free fibula flap mandible reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;77(3):314-317.
ChenYWuJGokavarapuSShenQJiT. Radiotherapy and smoking history are significant independent predictors for osteosynthesis-associated late complications in vascular free fibula reconstruction of mandible. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28(6):1508-1513.
45.
EttlTDriemelODrespBVReichertTEReutherJPistnerH. Feasibility of alloplastic mandibular reconstruction in patients following removal of oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2010;38(5):350-354.
46.
FanzioPMChangK-PChenH-H, et al. Plate exposure after anterolateral thigh free-flap reconstruction in head and neck cancer patients with composite mandibular defects. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(9):3055-3060.
47.
HeadCAlamDSercarzJA, et al. Microvascular flap reconstruction of the mandible: a comparison of bone grafts and bridging plates for restoration of mandibular continuity. Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2003;129(1):48-54.
48.
KnottPDSuhJDNabiliV, et al. Evaluation of hardware-related complications in vascularized bone grafts with locking mandibular reconstruction plate fixation. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2007;133(12):1302-1306.
49.
LindqvistCSöderholmA-LLainePPaatsamaJ. Rigid reconstruction plates for immediate reconstruction following mandibular resection for malignant tumors. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;50(11):1158-1163.
50.
McCannACShnayderYPrzyleckiWH, et al. Comparison of modern rigid fixation plating outcomes for segmental mandibular microvascular reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2019;129(5):1081-1086.
51.
MignognaFVRankowRGarayKF. A-O reconstruction plate and sternal osteomyocutaneous flap in primary mandibular reconstruction. Am J Surg. 1993;166(4):416-420.
52.
OnodaSKimataYYamadaK, et al. Prevention points for plate exposure in the mandibular reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012;40(8):e310-e314.
53.
RyuJKSternRLRobinsonMG, et al. Mandibular reconstruction using a titanium plate: the impact of radiation therapy on plate preservation. Int J Radiat Oncol. 1995;32(3):627-634.
54.
ShibaharaTNomaHFuruyaYTakakiR. Fracture of mandibular reconstruction plates used after tumor resection. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;60(2):182-185.
55.
van GemertJTMvan EsRJJRosenbergAJWPvan der BiltAKooleRVan CannEM. Free vascularized flaps for reconstruction of the mandible: complications, success, and dental rehabilitation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(7):1692-1698.
56.
van MinnenBNautaJMVermeyABosRRMRoodenburgJLN. Long-term functional outcome of mandibular reconstruction with stainless steel AO reconstruction plates. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;40(2):144-148.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
