Response to Letter to the Editor Regarding “Accuracy of Ultrasonography and Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Patients Undergoing Sialendoscopy for Sialolithiasis”
Restricted accessLetterFirst published online November, 2017
Response to Letter to the Editor Regarding “Accuracy of Ultrasonography and Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Patients Undergoing Sialendoscopy for Sialolithiasis”
ThomasWWDouglasJERassekhCH.Accuracy of ultrasonography and computed tomography in the evaluation of patients undergoing sialendoscopy for sialolithiasis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;156:834-839.
2.
BeckerMMarchalFBeckerCDet al. Sialolithiasis and salivary ductal stenosis: diagnostic accuracy of MR sialography with a three-dimensional extended-phase conjugate-symmetry rapid spin-echo sequence. Radiology. 2000;217:347-358.
3.
AndrettaMSfrisoPBotsiosCet al. Comparison of ultrasonography and sialography vs. magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of the primary Sjogren’s syndrome [in Italian]. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2001;21:22-31.
4.
JaduFMLamEWN. A comparative study of the diagnostic capabilities of 2D plain radiograph and 3D cone beam CT sialography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42:20110319.
5.
ModestMCGalinatLRabinowitzMRCurryJMRosenDCognettiDM.Learning progression in the use of sialendoscopy for sialolithiasis: effect on gland preservation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;151:240-245.
