Abstract
Objective
To assess dysphagia outcomes following surgical management of unilateral vocal fold immobility in children.
Data Sources
Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases.
Review Methods
A systematic review of the medical literature was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. An a priori protocol was defined to identify all articles that presented quantifiable outcome data in children aged <18 years who underwent surgical treatment to improve glottal competence for dysphagia. Two authors independently determined references meeting the inclusion criteria, extracted data, and assigned levels of evidence. Data were pooled via a random effects model where possible. The quality of studies was graded with the MINORS criteria.
Results
An overall 398 publications were screened, with 9 meeting inclusion criteria. A total of 115 patients were included. Of these, 75% had preoperative swallowing symptoms. Surgical intervention for dysphagia included 61 injection laryngoplasties, 11 medialization laryngoplasties, and 10 reinnervations (ansa cervicalis to recurrent laryngeal nerve). The articles consistently reported success in improving dysphagia symptoms, and limited meta-analysis demonstrated a mean improvement after surgical intervention in 79% (95% CI, 67%-91%) of children. The reported rate of minor and major complications was 15% (95% CI, 1%-29%). The MINORS scores ranged from 5 to 12.
Conclusion
Surgical management of unilateral vocal fold immobility in properly selected children can be an effective treatment for dysphagia when symptoms are present. Selection of surgical modalities relies on patient- and surgeon-related factors, and the rate of success is high across different interventions in treating these complex children.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
