Abstract
Objective
This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a mometasone steroid-eluting sinus implant compared to a nonsteroid-eluting sinus implant following endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis.
Study Design
Economic evaluation using a decision tree model.
Setting
Academic and nonacademic otolaryngology practices.
Subjects
Patients with refractory chronic rhinosinusitis undergoing ESS.
Methods
The economic perspective was the health care third party payer. Effectiveness and probability data were obtained from a single meta-analysis of 2 randomized, double-blind, controlled trials. Costs were obtained from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services database and wholesale pharmaceutical pricing. Multiple sensitivity analyses were performed including a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Comparative treatment groups were (1) placement of the mometasone steroid-eluting sinus implant following ESS and (2) placement of a nonsteroid-eluting implant following ESS. The primary outcome was cost per postoperative intervention avoided within 60 days after ESS.
Results
The mean cost for the steroid-eluting and nonsteroid-eluting sinus implant strategies were $1,572.91 and $365.18, respectively. The steroid-eluting strategy incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $5,489.68. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated a 74.3%, 87.2%, and 90.5% certainty that the steroid-eluting implant strategy is cost-effective at willingness-to-pay thresholds of $10,000, $25,000, and $50,000, respectively.
Conclusion
Results from this economic evaluation suggest that placement of a mometasone steroid-eluting sinus implant into the ethmoid cavity following ESS for refractory chronic rhinosinusitis is a cost-effective intervention for preventing a postoperative intervention within 60 days after surgery.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.