You are on the new improved site. You can view the old site in view-only mode here until June 27, 2026

Filter Results

Select search scope: search across all journals or within the current journal

Search this journal

Enter search terms…

Advanced search

/

About

About Sage
About Sage Journals
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Contact Us
Help

Information for

Authors
Editors
Librarians
Researchers
Reviewers
Frequently asked questions

Copyright © 2026 by Sage Publications.京ICP备09090397号-11

Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery

Journal indexing and metrics

Journal Homepage Submission guidelines

Restricted access

Letter

First published online 2013-10

Response to “Comparison of Plaintiff and Defendant Expert Witness Qualification in Malpractice Litigation in Otolaryngology”

Volume 149, Issue 4

https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599813499897

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1.

Eloy

JA

Svider

PF

Patel

D

Setzen

M

Baredes

S

. Comparison of plaintiff and defendant expert witness qualification in malpractice litigation in otolaryngology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;148:764-769.

Browse journal

Current issue OnlineFirst All issues

Similar articles

Retricted access

Safety of Repeated-Dose Intratympanic Injections with AM-101 in Acute Inner Ear Tinnitus

Retricted access

Dysphagia Outcomes Following Surgical Management of Unilateral Vocal Fold Immobility in Children: A Systematic Review

Retricted access

A Theoretical Approach to the Management of Paracetamol Overdosage

Retricted access

Beyond Phonosurgery: Considerations for Patient-Reported Outcomes and Speech Therapy in Transgender Vocal Feminization