Multiple Mini Interview for Selection into OTL Residency

Abstract

Objective: 1) To determine the reliability of the Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) for resident selection into an otolaryngology–head and neck surgery (OTL-HNS) program. 2) To assess the degree of acceptance by major stakeholders (interviewers and applicants) towards the MMI when compared to traditional interviews.

Method: Canadian medical graduates applying to OTL-HNS residency programs underwent MMI in 2011 and 2012. MMI had 7 stations evaluating unique candidate attributes. Stations include surgical skills assessment and 2 simulation scenarios with standardized actors for noncognitive traits. Reliability was determined, and upon completion, stakeholders rated aspects MMI using 7-point Likert scale.

Results: Data were collected from a total of 45 applicants and 19 evaluators. Overall interrater reliability of the MMI was good. The majority of applicants (>80%) felt that MMI helped them present their strengths and that it did not have any gender, cultural, or age bias. Assessors (>85%) felt that the MMI evaluated a valid range of competencies and that it tested more aspects of an applicant than traditional interviews. Both applicants and assessors (>70%) agreed that the MMI was a fair process, and both preferred the MMI over the traditional interview.

Conclusion: The MMI is a reliable tool for the selection of applicants to an OTL-HNS residency program. It is well accepted by both applicants and assessors, with the majority of stakeholders preferring the MMI over traditional interviews.