To assess functional connectivity in cortical networks in patients with nonbothersome tinnitus compared with a normal healthy nontinnitus control group by measuring low-frequency (<0.1 Hz) spontaneous blood oxygenation level–dependent (BOLD) signals at rest.
Design
Case-control.
Setting
Academic medical center.
Participants
Nonbothersome, idiopathic subjective tinnitus for at least 6 months (n = 18) and a normal healthy nontinnitus control group (n = 23).
Main Outcome Measure
Functional connectivity differences in 58 a priori selected seed regions of interest encompassing cortical loci in the default mode, attention, auditory, visual, somatosensory, and cognitive networks.
Results
The median age of the 18 subjects was 54 years (interquartile range [IQR], 52-57), 66% were male, 90% were white, median Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) score was 8 (IQR, 4-14), and a median Beck Depression Index score was 1 (IQR, 0-5). The median age for the control group was 46 years (IQR, 39-54), and 52% were male. Of the 58 seeds analyzed, no regions had significantly different functional connectivity among the nonbothersome tinnitus group when compared with the control group.
Conclusion
Among nonbothersome tinnitus patients, the tinnitus percept does not appear to alter the functional connectivity of the auditory cortex or other key cortical regions.
GatehouseS. The role of non-auditory factors in measured and self-reported disability. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1990;476:249-256.
2.
JacobsonGPCalderJANewmanCWPetersonELWhartonJAAhmadBK. Electrophysiological indices of selective auditory attention in subjects with and without tinnitus. Hear Res. 1996;97:66-74.
3.
WilsonPHHenryJBowenMHaralambousG. Tinnitus reaction questionnaire: psychometric properties of a measure of distress associated with tinnitus. J Speech Hear Res. 1991;34:197-201.
JastreboffPJJastreboffMM. Tinnitus retraining therapy: a different view on tinnitus [Review]. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2006;68:23-29.
6.
LockwoodAHSalviRJCoadMLTowsleyMLWackDSMurphyBW. The functional neuroanatomy of tinnitus: evidence for limbic system links and neural plasticity. Neurology. 1998;50:114-120.
7.
HaabLWallhausser-FrankeETrenadoCStraussDJ. Modeling limbic influences on habituation deficits in chronic tinnitus aurium. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:4234-4237.
8.
RauscheckerJPLeaverAMMuhlauM. Tuning out the noise: limbic-auditory interactions in tinnitus. Neuron. 2010;66:819-826.
9.
MirzFPedersenBIshizuK. Positron emission tomography of cortical centers of tinnitus. Hear Res. 1999;134:133-144.
10.
AnderssonGLyttkensLHirvelaCFurmarkTTillforsMFredriksonM. Regional cerebral blood flow during tinnitus: a PET case study with lidocaine and auditory stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol. 2000;120:967-972.
11.
ReyesSASalviRJBurkardRF. Brain imaging of the effects of lidocaine on tinnitus. Hear Res. 2002;171:43-50.
12.
PlewniaCReimoldMNajibA. Dose-dependent attenuation of auditory phantom perception (tinnitus) by PET-guided repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Hum Brain Mapp. 2007;28:238-246.
13.
AnderssonGJurisLClassonEFredriksonMFurmarkT. Consequences of suppressing thoughts about tinnitus and the effects of cognitive distraction on brain activity in tinnitus patients. Audiol Neurootol. 2006;11:301-309.
14.
LockwoodAHWackDSBurkardRF. The functional anatomy of gaze-evoked tinnitus and sustained lateral gaze. Neurology. 2001;56:472-480.
15.
ArnoldWBartensteinPOestreicherERomerWSchwaigerM. Focal metabolic activation in the predominant left auditory cortex in patients suffering from tinnitus: a PET study with [18F]deoxyglucose. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1996;58:195-199.
16.
WangHTianJYinD. Positron emission tomography of tinnitus-related brain areas [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 2000;35:420-424.
17.
LangguthBEichhammerPKreutzerA. The impact of auditory cortex activity on characterizing and treating patients with chronic tinnitus—first results from a PET study. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2006;(556):84-88.
18.
SmithJAMennemeierMBartelT. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for tinnitus: a pilot study. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:529-534.
19.
OgawaSLeeTMKayARTankDW. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:9868-9872.
20.
RaichleMEMintunMA. Brain work and brain imaging. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2006;29:449-476.
21.
BiswalBYetkinFZHaughtonVMHydeJS. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1995;34:537-541.
22.
FoxMDCorbettaMSnyderAZVincentJLRaichleME. Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:10046-10051.
23.
DosenbachNUFairDAMiezinFM. Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:11073-11078.
24.
CordesDHaughtonVMArfanakisK. Frequencies contributing to functional connectivity in the cerebral cortex in “resting-state” data. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:1326-1333.
25.
LoweMJMockBJSorensonJA. Functional connectivity in single and multislice echoplanar imaging using resting-state fluctuations. Neuroimage. 1998;7:119-132.
26.
GreiciusMDKrasnowBReissALMenonV. Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:253-258.
27.
BurtonHDixitSLitkowskiPWingertJR. Functional connectivity for somatosensory and motor cortex in spastic diplegia. Somatosens Mot Res. 2009;26:90-104.
28.
BurtonHWinelandABhattacharyaMNicklausJGarciaKSPiccirilloJF. Altered networks in bothersome tinnitus: a functional connectivity study. BMC Neurosci. 2012;13:3.
29.
SteerRABallRRanieriWFBeckAT. Further evidence for the construct validity of the Beck Depression Inventory-II with psychiatric outpatients. Psychol Rep. 1997;80:443-446.
30.
OjemannJGAkbudakESnyderAZMcKinstryRCRaichleMEConturoTE. Anatomic localization and quantitative analysis of gradient refocused echo-planar fMRI susceptibility artifacts. Neuroimage. 1997;6:156-167.
31.
TalairachJTousignantP. Co-planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. New York: Thieme Medical; 1988.
32.
HillJDierkerDNeilJ. A surface-based analysis of hemispheric asymmetries and folding of cerebral cortex in term-born human infants. J Neurosci. 2010;30:2268-2276.
33.
McCombeABaguleyDColesR. Guidelines for the grading of tinnitus severity: the results of a working group commissioned by the British Association of Otolaryngologists, Head and Neck Surgeons, 1999. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2001;26:388-393.
34.
BeckATSteerRABallRRanieriW. Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories -IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients. J Pers Assess. 1996;67:588-597.
35.
SmithSMNicholsTE. Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. Neuroimage. 2009;44:83-98.
36.
SmitsMKovacsSDeRidderDPeetersRRvan HeckePSunaertS. Lateralization of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activation in the auditory pathway of patients with lateralized tinnitus [see comment]. Neuroradiology. 2007;49:669-679.
37.
LantingCPDe KleineEBartelsHVan DijkP. Functional imaging of unilateral tinnitus using fMRI. Acta Otolaryngol. 2008;128:415-421.
38.
HallamRSMcKennaLShurlockL. Tinnitus impairs cognitive efficiency. Int J Audiol. 2004;43:218-226.
39.
StevensCWalkerGBoyerMGallagherM. Severe tinnitus and its effect on selective and divided attention. Int J Audiol. 2007;46:208-216.
40.
CunyCNorenaAEl MassiouiFChéry-CrozeS. Reduced attention shift in response to auditory changes in subjects with tinnitus. Audiol Neurootol. 2004;9:294-302.
41.
RossiterSStevensCWalkerG. Tinnitus and its effect on working memory and attention. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006;49:150-160.
42.
AnderssonGMcKennaL. The role of cognition in tinnitus. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2006;(556):39-43.
43.
CorbettaMPatelGShulmanGL. The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind. Neuron. 2008;58:306-324.
44.
CorbettaMShulmanGL. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:201-215.
45.
De RidderDElgoyhenABRomoRLangguthB. Phantom percepts: tinnitus and pain as persisting aversive memory networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:8075-8080.
46.
BrozoskiTJBauerCACasparyDM. Elevated fusiform cell activity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of chinchillas with psychophysical evidence of tinnitus. J Neurosci. 2002;22:2383-2390.
47.
ZhengYBaekJHSmithPFDarlingtonCL. Cannabinoid receptor down-regulation in the ventral cochlear nucleus in a salicylate model of tinnitus. Hear Res. 2007;228:105-111.
48.
MelcherJRSigalovskyISGuinanJJJrLevineRA. Lateralized tinnitus studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging: abnormal inferior colliculus activation. J Neurophysiol. 2000;83:1058-1072.
49.
BrozoskiTJCiobanuLBauerCA. Central neural activity in rats with tinnitus evaluated with manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MEMRI). Hear Res. 2007;228:168-179.
50.
KaltenbachJA. Summary of evidence pointing to a role of the dorsal cochlear nucleus in the etiology of tinnitus. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2006;(556):20-26.
51.
BledsoeSCJrKoehlerSTucciDLZhouJLePCShoreSE. Ventral cochlear nucleus responses to contralateral sound are mediated by commissural and olivocochlear pathways. J Neurophysiol. 2009;102:886-900.
