Abstract
Objective: 1) Develop a method for quantification of osteotome sharpness in a rhinoplasty model, using artificial bone; 2) demonstrate changes in osteotome sharpness over multiple uses; and, 3) compare sharpness of osteotomes from different manufacturers at baseline and after multiple uses.
Method: Osteotomes were passed through synthetic bone blocks. Sharpness was measured using the Instron Universal Tester (force required to cut #2 Prolene suture) at baseline and after 1, 4, 7, and 10 osteotomies. Changes in sharpness over time were assessed using within-sample t tests. Comparison of manufacturers was performed with multiway ANOVA.
Results: A novel, prospective surgical model was developed. Osteotomes from 5 manufacturers were tested (Nextedge, Black & Black, Storz, Miltex, and Biomet). Baseline measurements showed that the Storz osteotome was sharpest (1.74 lbs, P < .001), followed by Miltex and Biomet (2.50 lbs, 2.68 lbs), and Nextedge and Black & Black (3.48 lbs, 3.40 lbs). All osteotomes except Nextedge (P = .098) demonstrated a significant decrease in sharpness over time (P = .02 to P < .001), though relative changes and absolute sharpness varied widely between instruments. ANOVA showed the Storz osteotome was significantly sharper across all uses and timepoints (P < .001). The greatest decrease in sharpness over time was seen with Black & Black (-1.28 lbs).
Conclusion: Otolaryngologists use osteotomes in cosmetic and functional rhinoplasty. Millimeter-level accuracy in these procedures is essential to maximize outcome and minimize complications. Multiple similar-appearing instruments are available, but their relative efficacy is infrequently tested. We have demonstrated that, at least in the case of osteotomes, not all instruments are created equally.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.