There has been growing concern raised by nurse educators regarding the potentialfor litigation by nursing students who are dissatisfied with educators' appraisal of these students' clinical performance. A descriptive survey using a cross-sectional design was used to assess the relationship between institutional policies and procedures related to student clinical evaluation practices. Population for this survey was diploma and basic baccalaureate nursing programs in Canada (N = 94). The response rate to this survey was 86.2% (81/94 programs). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Reliability of the instrument was assessed using contingency tables comparing the data obtained with the same program's written policies and procedures (p = .50). There were five significant findings: (a) a lack of faculty evaluation standards; (b) clinical instructors evaluating students alone; (c) the same members serving on more than one level of review; (d) lack of procedures when conducting informal and formal hearings; and (e) alteration of professional judgments of nurse faculty by nonnurses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, E. , Corbo, G., De Blois, L., De Young, D., & Just, G. (1979). Legal considerations in evaluating the clinical performance of students. In Considerations in clinical evaluations: Instructors, students, legal issues, data. New York: National League for Nursing.
2.
Alexander, K. (1980). School law. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
3.
Barnes, C. (1978). The specter of academic malpractice. Change, 10(5), 10-11.
4.
Barritt, E. R. , & Irion, L. A. (1970). Advantages and disadvantages of non-grading. Nursing Outlook, 18(4), 40-41.
5.
Beam, S. , & Hines, E. R. (1981). Provisions and consumer expectations. Journal of College Student Personnel, 22(1), 36-41.
6.
Bondy, K. N. (1983). Criterion-referenced definitions for rating scales in clinical evaluation. Journal of Nursing Education, 22(9), 376-382.
7.
Brozenec, S. , Marshall, J. R., Thomas, C., & Walsh, M. (1987). Evaluating borderline students. Journal of Nursing Education, 1(26), 42-44.
8.
Calogero, J. S. (1983). Allied health student and faculty attitudes regarding faculty evaluation. Journal of Allied Health, 12(1), 43-47.
9.
Connors, E. T. (1981). Educational tort liability and malpractice. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.
10.
Creighton, H. (1975). Law every nurse should know (3rd ed.). Toronto: W. B. Saunders.
11.
De Tornyay, R. (1985). Second opinions: When needed?Journal of Nursing Education, 8(24), 313-313.
12.
Folger, J. , & Shubert, J. (1981). Who cares about student complaints?Educational Record, 62 (Fall), 31-33.
13.
Golden, E. J. (1982). Procedureal due process for students at public coiieges and universities. Journal of Law and Education, 11(7), 331-359.
14.
Golembiecki, B. L. , & Ethington, N. (1979). Legal implications of clinical evaluation. In Considerations in clinical evaluation: Instructors, students, legal issues, data. New York: National League for Nursing.
15.
Hilton, A. (1980). Relationships between classroom theory and clinical practice. Nursing Papers, 12(3), 20-23.
16.
Iovacchini, E. V. (1981). The impact of recent academic due process decisions on counsellor education programs. Counsellor Education and Supervision, 20(3), 163-171.
17.
Irby, D. M. , Fantel, J. I., Milam, S. D., & Schwarz, M. R. (1981). Legal guidelines for evaluating and dismissing medical students. New England Journal of Medicine, 304(3), 180-184.
18.
Jennings, E. K. (1980-1981). Breach of contract suits by students against post secondary education institutions: Can they succeed? (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska, 1980). Dissertation Abstracts International, 81, 05842-05842.
19.
Jorgensen, C. A. (1979). Donohue v. Copiague Union Free School District: New York chooses not to recognize "educational malpractice."Albany Law Review, 43(2), 339-359.
20.
Kane v. Board of Governors University of British Columbia, 110 D.L.R. (3rd), 311 S.C.C. (1980).
21.
Kapp, M. B. (1981). Legal issues in faculty evaluation of student clinical performance. Journal of Dental Education, 44(8), 478-483.
22.
Kirk, J. , & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23.
Krivy, G.J.P. (1982). The legal rights and responsibilities of university students in Canada (Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, 1982). Dissertation Abstracts International, 82, 27358.
24.
La Morte, M. W. , & Meadows, R. B. (1979). Educationally sound due process in academic affairs. Journal of Law and Education, 8(4), 197-214.
25.
Lerblance, P. (1979). Legal and educational aspects of student dismissals: A view from the law school. Southwestern Law Journal, 33(2), 605-633.
26.
Logdson, J. B. , Lacefield, P. K., & Clark, M. J. (1979). The development of an academic grievance procedure. Nursing Outlook, 27(3), 184-190.
27.
Majorowicz, K. (1986). Clinical grades and the grievance process. Nurse Educator, 2(11), 36-40.
28.
Mattingly, S. L. , & Gehring, D. D. (1980). The dental educator and the law. Journal of Dental Education, 44(8), 478-483.
29.
Miller, P. (1982). Student grade appeals-Procedure and process. Journal of Nursing Education, 21(6), 34-38.
30.
Murphy, J. F. , & Sandling, R. (1978). Educational administration: Due process for student grievances. Journal of Nursing Administration, 8(11), 39-43.
31.
Nash, D. A. , Moore, R. N., & Andes, J. O. (1981). Academic dismissal for clinical reasons: Implications of the Horowitz case. Journal of Dental Education, 45(3), 150-155.
32.
Niedringhaus, L. , & O'Driscoll, D. L. (1983). Staying within the law-Academic probation and dismissal. Nursing Outlook, 31(3), 156-159.
33.
Owens, H. F. (1980). They'll take you to court if you don't watch out. Community and Junior College Journal, 51, 12-16.
34.
Ozimek, D. , & Yura, H. (1977). Students have responsibilities as well as rights. New York: National League for Nursing.
35.
Pavela, G. (1978). Judicial review of academic decision making after Horowitz. NOPLE School Law Journal, 8(1), 55-75.
36.
Polit, D. , & Hungler, B. (1983). Nursing research: Principles and methods (2nd ed.). Toronto: J. B. Lippincott.
37.
Pollok, C. S. , Poteet, G. W., & Whelan, W. L. (1983). Diminishing faculty liability. Nurse Educator, 8(1), 31-34.
38.
Ray, L. K. (1981). Toward contractual rights for college students. Journal of Law and Education, 10(2), 163-189.
39.
Robinson, K. , & Bridgewater, S. (1979). Named in a grievance: It happened to us. Nursing Outlook, 27(3), 191-194.
40.
Spink, L. M. (1983). Due process in academic dismissal. Journal of Nursing Education, 2(7), 305-306.
41.
Stainton, M. C. (1983). A format for recording the clinical performance of nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education, 22(3), 114-116.
42.
Thorne, G. L. (1983). Measuring student learning. Nurse Educator, 8(3), 7-10.
43.
Vernon, E. L. (1979). Due process flexibility in academic dismissals: Horowitz and beyond. Journal of Law and Education, 8(1), 45-54.
44.
Woolley, A. S. (1977). The long and tortured history of clinical evaluation. Nursing Outlook, 25(5), 308-315.
