Design and Measurement Challenges in Family Research

Ball, D. , McKenny, P. , & Price-Bonham, S. (1983). Use of repeated measures: Designs in family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 885-896.

Bavelas, J. (1984). On naturalistic family research. Family Process, 23, 337-341.

Beavers, W. , & Voeller, M. (1983). Family models: Comparing and contrasting the Olson circumplex model with the Beavers symptoms model. Family Process, 22, 85-98.

Broderick, C. , & Smith, J. (1981). The general systems approach to the family. In W. Burr , R. Hill , F. Nye , & I. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family: Vol 2. General theories, theoretical orientations. New York: Free Press.

Buckley, W. (1968). Society as a complex adaptive system. In W. Buckley (Ed.), Modern systems research for the behavioral scientist: A sourcebook. Chicago: Aldine.

Cromwell, R. , & Peterson, G. (1983). Multi-system, multi-method family assessment in clinical contexts. Family Process, 22, 147-163.

Denzin, N. (1978). Sociological methods: A sourcebook New York: McGraw-Hill.

Fisher, L. , Kokes, R. , Ransom, D. , Phillips, S. , & Rudd, P. (1985). Alternative strategies for creating relational family data. Family Process, 24, 213-224.

Green, R. , Kolevzan, N. , & Vosler, N. (1985). The Beavers-Timberlawn model of family competence and the circumplex model of family adaptability and cohesion: Separate, but equal? Family Process, 24, 385-398.

Houck, G. (1992). Measurement offamily health (Tech. Rep.). Seattle: University of Washington, Family Impact Study.

Lewis, F. , Stetz, K. , & Primomo, J. (1985, June). Problems and management strategies in families with chronically ill mothers. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Cancer Society, Hawaii.

Lewis, F. M. , Woods, N. F. , Hough, E. E. , & Bensley, L. S. (1989). The family's functioning with chronic illness in the mother: The spouse's perspective. Social Science and Medicine, 29, 1261-1269.

McCubbin, H. I. , Joy, C. B. , Cauble, A. E. , Comeau, J. K. , Patterson, J. M. , & Needle, R. N. (1980). Family stress and coping: A decade review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 125-141.

Melito, R. (1985). Adaptation in family systems: Adevelopmental perspective. Family Process, 24,89-100.

Mitchell, E. (1986). Multiple triangulation: A methodology for nursing science. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(3), 18-26.

Murphy, S. (1989). Multiple triangulation: Applications in a program of nursing research. Nursing Research, 38, 294-297.

Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Oleson, D. , Russell, C. , & Sprenkle, D. (1983). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: VI. Theoretical update. Family Process, 22, 69-83.

Rogers, L. , Millar, F. , & Bavelas, J. (1985). Methods for analyzing marital conflict discourse: Implications of a system's approach. Family Process, 24, 175-187.

Sigafoos, A. , Reiss, D. , Rich, J. , & Douglas, E. (1985). Pragmatics in the measurement of family functioning: An interpretive framework for methodology. Family Process, 24, 189-203.

Speer, D. (1970). Family systems: Morphostasis and morphogenesis, or is homeostasis enough? Family Process, 9, 259-278.

Stetz, K. , Lewis, F. , & Primomo, J. (1986). Faculty coping strategies and chronic illness in the mother. Family Relations, 35, 515-522.

Thompson, L. , & Walker, A. (1982). The dyad as the unit of analysis: Conceptual and methodological issues. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 889-900.

Watzlawick, P. , Weakland, J. , & Fisch, R. (1974). Change: Principles ofproblem formation and problem resolution. New York: Norton.