Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study examined whether emotional distress among U.S. adults diagnosed with cancer was influenced by death rates, survival rates, and new cases based on cancer type and individual-level variables (health efficacy, perceived health, and use of information and communication technologies and social media for health-related reasons). Health Information National Trends Survey 5 data from cycle 1 and cycle 2 were used to examine emotional distress among individuals who had experienced 1 of 17 different types of cancer diagnoses. A multilevel model and follow-up one-way ANOVA indicated a small statistically significant difference in emotional distress across cancer types. To investigate the influence of individual-level variables on emotional distress, a hierarchical regression analysis indicated that, after controlling for perceived health and health efficacy, using social media in a greater number of health-related ways significantly predicted greater emotional distress, while using information and communication technologies in a greater number of health-related ways did not.

Keywords

cancer emotional distress communication social media

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Cancer Society (ACS). (2018). Cancer facts & figures 2018. American Cancer Society.

American Cancer Society (ACS). (2020). Cancer facts & figures 2020. American Cancer Society.

American Cancer Society (ACS). (2021). Key statistics for basal and squamous cell skin cancers. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/basal-and-squamous-cell-skin-cancer/about/key-statistics.html

Attai

D. J.

Cowher

M. S.

Al-Hamadani

Schoger

J. M.

Staley

A. C.

Landercasper

J. L.

(2015). Twitter social media is an effective tool for breast cancer patient education and support: Patient-reported outcomes by survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(7), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4721

Banik

Luszczynska

Pawlowska

Cieslak

Knoll

Scholz

(2017). Enabling, not cultivating: Received social support and self-efficacy explain quality of life after lung cancer surgery. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 51(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9821-9

Beaudoin

C. E.

Tao

(2007). Benefiting from social capital in online support groups: An empirical study of cancer patients. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(4), 587–590. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9986

Bender

J. L.

Yue

R. Y. K.

M. J.

Deacken

Jadad

(2013). A lot of action, but not in the right direction: Systematic review and content analysis of smartphone applications for the prevention, detection, and management of cancer. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(12), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2661

Brintzenhofe-Szoc

K. M.

Levin

T. T.

Kissane

D. W.

Zabora

J. R.

(2009). Mixed anxiety/depression symptoms in a large cancer cohort: Prevalence by cancer type. Psychosomatics, 50(4), 383–391. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psy.50.4.383

Canadian Cancer Society (CCS). (n.d.). Survival statistics for non-melanoma skin cancer. http://www.cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-type/skin-non-melanoma/prognosis-and-survival/survival-statistics/?region=on

10.

Cardoso

Graca

Klut

Trancas

Papoila

(2016). Depression and anxiety symptoms following cancer diagnosis: A cross-sectional study. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 21(5), 562–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2015.1125006

11.

Chintamani

A. G.

Khandelwal

Tandon

Jain

Kumar

Narayan

Bamal

Srinivas

Saxena

(2011). The correlation of anxiety and depression levels with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine Short Reports, 2(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1258/shorts.2010.010072

12.

Farpour

H. R.

Habibi

Owji

S. H.

(2017). Positive impact of social media use on depression in cancer patients. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 18(11). https://doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.11.2985

13.

Field

A. P.

(2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics: And sex and drugs and rock ‘n’ roll (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

14.

Foster

Breckons

Cotterell

Barbosa

Calman

Corner

Fenlon

Foster

Grimmett

Richardson

Smith

P. W.

(2015). Cancer survivors’ self-efficacy to self-manage in the year following primary treatment. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 9(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-014-0384-0

15.

Haugland

Wahl

A. K.

Hofoss

DeVon

H. A.

(2016). Association between general self-efficacy, social support, cancer-related stress and physical health-related quality of life: A path model study in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 14(11), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0143-y

16.

Kim

J.-N.

Lee

(2014). Communication and cybercoping: Coping with chronic illness through communicative action in online support networks. Journal of Health Communication, 19(7), 775–794. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.864724

17.

Lin

L. Y.

Sidani

J. E.

Shensa

Radovic

Miller

Colditz

J. B.

Hoffman

B. L.

Giles

L. M.

Primack

B. A.

(2016). Association between social media use and depression among U.S. young adults. Depression and Anxiety, 33(4), 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22466

18.

Linden

Vodermaier

MacKenzie

Greig

(2012). Anxiety and depression after cancer diagnosis: Prevalence rates by cancer type, gender, and age. Journal of Affective Disorders, 141(2–3), 343–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.025

19.

National Cancer Institute. (n.d.). Cancer stat facts. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/

20.

National Cancer Institute. (2017). Health Information National Trends Survey 5 (HINTS 5): Cycle 1 methodology report. Westat.

21.

National Cancer Institute. (2018). Health Information National Trends Survey 5 (HINTS 5): Cycle 2 methodology report. Westat.

22.

Omran

McMillan

(2018). Symptom severity, anxiety, depression, self-efficacy and quality of life in patients with cancer. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 19(2), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.2.365

23.

Perrault

E. K.

Hildenbrand

G. M.

McCullock

S. P.

Schmitz

K. J.

Lambert

N. J.

(2020). Online information seeking behaviors of breast cancer patients before and after diagnosis: From website discovery to improving website information. Cancer Treatment and Research Communications, 23, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctarc.2020.100176

24.

Pilevarzadeh

Amirshahi

Afsargharehbagh

Rafiemanesh

Hashemi

S.-M.

Balouchi

(2019). Global prevalence of depression among breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 176(3), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05271-3

25.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Spybrook

Congdon

Liu

Martinez

(2011). Optimal design software for multi-level and longitudinal research (version 3.01) [Software]. https://www.wtgrantfoundation.org

26.

Snijders

T. A.

Bosker

R. J.

(1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. SAGE Publications.

27.

Tung

H.-Y.

Chao

T.-B.

Lin

Y.-H.

S.-F.

Lee

H.-Y.

Ching

C.-Y.

Hung

K.-W.

Lin

T.-J.

(2016). Depression, fatigue, and QoL in colorectal cancer patients during and after treatment. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 38(7), 893–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945916630256

28.